Attorney General Merrick B. Garland Honors Justice Department Employees and Partners for the 72nd Annual Attorney General’s Awards

Source: United States Department of Justice Criminal Division

Attorney General Merrick B. Garland announced the recipients of the 72nd Annual Attorney General’s Awards, honoring Justice Department employees and others for extraordinary contributions to the enforcement of our nation’s laws. This year, there are 437 award recipients in 23 categories.

The 72nd Attorney General’s Awards and recipients are as follows:

The Attorney General’s David Margolis Award for Exceptional Service is the highest award given by the Justice Department to recognize employee achievement.

The Attorney General commends the investigation and prosecution team of the Tree of Life Synagogue shooting: U.S. Attorney Honorable Eric G. Olshan for the Western District of Pennsylvania; Trial Attorney Barry K. Disney of the Criminal Division’s Capital Case Section; First Assistant U.S. Attorney Troy Rivetti for the Western District of Pennsylvania; Trial Attorney Aaron J. Stewart of the Criminal Division’s Capital Case Section; Assistant U.S. Attorney Soo C. Song for the Western District of Pennsylvania; Special Agent Samantha Bell of the FBI Pittsburgh Field Office; Assistant U.S. Attorney Nicole Vasquez Schmitt for the Western District of Pennsylvania; Special Agent Brian R. Collins of the FBI Pittsburgh Field Office; Assistant U.S. Attorney Christopher M. Hanrahan for the Western District of Pennsylvania; Staff Operations Specialist Evan P. Browne of the FBI Pittsburgh Field Office; Victim Assistance Specialist Adrienne R. Howe for the Western District of Pennsylvania; Victim Specialist Bridget M. Simunovic for the FBI Pittsburgh Field Office; Trial Attorney Mary J. Hahn of the Civil Rights Division’s Criminal Section; Victim Specialist Kristin N. Czernewski of the FBI Pittsburgh Field Office; and Trial Attorney Julia K. Gegenheimer of the Civil Rights Division’s Criminal Section.

The Attorney General’s Award for Distinguished Service is the Department’s second highest award for employee performance. There are 16 Distinguished Service Awards.

The first Distinguished Award is presented to the BOP Deaths in Custody Evaluation Team: Chief Inspector Jan E. Davis Hamm of the Office of Inspector General’s Evaluations and Inspections Division; Chief Inspector Michael E. Pannone of the Office of Inspector General’s Evaluations and Inspections Division; Senior Inspector Alexander C. Parker of the Office of Inspector General’s Evaluations and Inspections Division; and Inspector Lincoln T. Berget of the Office of Inspector General’s Evaluations and Inspections Division.

The second Distinguished Award is presented to the Uvalde Team: Deputy Director Robert Chapman of the Office of Community Oriented Policing Services; Senior Counsel to the Director Shanetta Cutlar of the Office of Community Oriented Policing Services; Policing Assistance and Reform Sociologist Nazmia Comrie of the Office of Community Oriented Policing Services.

The third Distinguished Award is presented to the Second Amendment Appellate Litigation Team: Assistant to the Solicitor General Vivek Suri of the Office of the Solicitor General; Appellate Litigation Counsel Mark B. Stern of the Civil Division’s Appellate Staff; Deputy Chief Ann O’Connell Adams of the Criminal Division’s Appellate Section; Appellate Litigation Counsel Michael S. Raab of the Civil Division’s Appellate Staff; Deputy Chief Scott Meisler of the Criminal Division’s Appellate Section; Trial Attorney Courtney L. Dixon of the Civil Division’s Appellate Staff; Trial Attorney William Glaser Criminal Division’s Appellate Section; Trial Attorney Sean R. Janda of the Civil Division’s Appellate Staff; Trial Attorney Joshua Handell of the Criminal Division’s Appellate Section; Trial Attorney Kevin B. Soter of the Civil Division’s Appellate Staff; Trial Attorney Andrew Noll of the Criminal Division’s Appellate Section; Trial Attorney Steven H. Hazel Civil Division’s Appellate Staff; Trial Attorney Mahogane Reed of the Criminal Division’s Appellate Section; Trial Attorney Benjamin R. Lewis Civil Division’s Appellate Staff; and Deputy Director Abby C. Wright of the Civil Division’s Appellate Staff.

The fourth Distinguished Award is presented to the Purdue Pharma Team: Deputy Director and General Counsel Ramona D. Elliott of the U.S. Trustee Program’s Executive Office; Deputy General Counsel Lisa A. Tracy of the U.S. Trustee Program’s Executive Office; Associate General Counsel Nan Roberts Eitel of the of the U.S. Trustee Program’s Executive Office; Associate General Counsel P. Matthew Sutko of the of the U.S. Trustee Program’s Executive Office; U.S. Trustee William K. Harrington of the U.S. Trustee Program’s Regions 1 and 2; Assistant U.S. Trustee Linda A. Riffkin of the U.S. Trustee Program’s Regions 1 and 2; Trial Attorney Paul M. Schwartzberg of the U.S. Trustee Program’s Region 2; Trial Attorney Denise J. Penn of the U.S. Trustee Program’s Executive Office; Trial Attorney John P. Sheahan of the U.S. Trustee Program’s Executive Office; Trial Attorney Beth A. Levene of the U.S. Trustee Program’s Executive Office; Trial Attorney Sumi K. Sakata of the U.S. Trustee Program’s Executive Office; Attorney Michael Shih Civil Division’s Appellate Staff; Attorney Sean R. Janda Civil Division’s Appellate Staff; Assistant U.S. Attorney Lawrence A. Fogelman for the Southern District of New York; Assistant U.S. Attorney Peter M. Aronoff for Southern District of New York; Deputy Solicitor General Curtis E. Gannon of the Office of the Solicitor General; Assistant to the Solicitor General Masha G. Hansford of the Office of the Solicitor General

The fifth Distinguished Award is presented to the Medicare Drug Negotiation Team: Assistant Director Michelle Bennett of the Civil Division; Staff Attorney Steve Myers of the Civil Division; Senior Trial Counsel Steve Pezzi of the Civil Division; Staff Attorney Catherine Padhi of the Civil Division; Appellate Litigation Counsel Michael S. Raab of the Civil Division; Staff Attorney David Peters of the Civil Division; Staff Attorney Maxwell Baldi of the Civil Division; Staff Attorney Lindsey Powell of the Civil Division; Trial Attorney Christine Coogle of the Civil Division; Trial Attorney Cassie Snyder of the Civil Division; Trial Attorney Alexander V. Sverdlov Civil Division; Trial Attorney Mike Gaffney of the Civil Division.

The sixth Distinguished Award is presented to the Magazine Case Team: Supervisory Special Agent Dustin Berger of the FBI Minneapolis Field Office; Paralegal Specialist Chrissy J. Nguyen for the District of Minnesota; Forensic Accountant Lacramioara Blackwell of the FBI Minneapolis Field Office; Paralegal Specialist Hannah C. Serres for the District of Minnesota; Assistant U.S. Attorney Matthew S. Ebert for the District of Minnesota; Assistant U.S. Attorney Joseph H. Thompson for the District of Minnesota; Assistant U.S. Attorney Garrett S. Fields for the District of Minnesota; Litigation Support Specialist Rachel L. Thrasher for the District of Minnesota; Assistant U.S. Attorney Harry M. Jacobs for the District of Minnesota; U.S. Postal Inspector John M. Western of the U.S. Postal Inspection (USPIS) Denver Field Office; and Special Agent Jared F. Kary of the FBI Minneapolis Field Office.

The seventh Distinguished Award is presented to the Emergency Support Function #13 National Coordinator Center: National Coordinator Robert P. McCloy of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives; Unit Chief Michael T. McCarthy of the FBI’s Critical Incident Response Group; Correctional Program Specialist Jacob Dyer of the Federal Bureau of Prisons; Special Agent Robert L. Patrizi of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives; Special Agent Christopher E. Felski of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives; Special Agent Michael D. Schaefer of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives; Special Agent Gregory A. Fox of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives; Special Agent Nathan P. Shaffer of the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA); Program Analyst Jennifer D. Ivy of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives; Assistant Chief Inspector Jeffrey R. Sharp U.S. Marshals Service (USMS); Budget Analyst Naomi Jacques of the Federal Bureau of Prisons; Emergency Management Specialist Edward G. Sherburne III of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives; Special Agent Gabriel S. Mamock of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives; Assistant Chief Inspector Andrew Slazinik of the USMS; and Special Agent Daniel R. Marchant of the DEA.

The eighth Distinguished Award is presented to the Google Search Team: Trial Attorney Diana A. Aguilar Aldape of the Antitrust Division’s San Francisco Office; Trial Attorney Claire M. Maddox of the Antitrust Division’s Technology and Digital Platforms; Assistant Section Chief Meagan K. Bellshaw of the Antitrust Division’s Financial Services, Fintech, and Banking Section; Trial Attorney Michael G. McLellan of the Antitrust Division’s Financial Services, Fintech, and Banking Section; Acting Deputy Director of Civil Litigation David E. Dahlquist of the Antitrust Division’s Litigation Program; Economics Director of Enforcement Office Aditi M. Mehta of the Antitrust Division’s Assistant Attorney General; Deputy Branch Director Kenneth Dintzer of the Antitrust Division’s Commercial Litigation Branch/National Courts; Senior Litigation Counsel Erin K. Murdock-Park of the Antitrust Division’s Litigation Program; Trial Attorney Jeremy M.P. Goldstein of the Antitrust Division’s San Fransico Office; Economist Craig T. Peters of the Antitrust Division’s Economic Policy Section; Trial Attorney Richard C. Gower of the Antitrust Division’s Technology and Digital Platforms; Assistant Section Chief Adam T. Severt of the Antitrust Division’s Technology and Digital Platforms; Trial Attorney Karl E. Herrmann of the Antitrust Division’s Technology and Digital Platforms; Counsel to the Assistant Attorney General Lara E.V. Trager of the Antitrust Division’s Technology and Digital Platforms; Assistant Section Chief Elizabeth S. Jensen of the Antitrust Division’s San Fransico Office; Trial Attorney Sara Trent of the Antitrust Division’s Technology and Digital Platforms; Trial Attorney Matthew R. Jones of the Antitrust Division’s Financial Services, Fintech, and Banking Section; Economist Andrew S. Vollmer of the Antitrust Division’s Economic Litigation Section; Economist Samuel D. Krumholz of the Antitrust Division’s Economic Regulatory Section; and Trial Attorney Catharine S. Wright of the Antitrust Division’s Technology and Digital Platforms.

The ninth Distinguished Award is presented to the Counternarcotic Cyber Investigations Task Force: Special Agent Michael A. Buemi of the DEA’s Miami Field Division; Task Force Officer Carlos Muvdi of the DEA’s Miami Field Division; Staff Coordinator Hauns G. Charters of the DEA’s Special Operations Division; Sanctions Investigator Thomas L. Vien of the Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control; Postal Inspector Rafael A. Garcia of the USPIS Miami Division; Special Agent James B. Whitworth of the DEA’s Miami Field Division; Special Agent Alexis J. Gregory of Homeland Security Investigation (HSI), Program Manager Lissel Wilson of U.S. Custom and Border Protection’s Officer National Targeting Center;

Sanctions Investigator Matthew B. Hebron of the Department of the Treasury’s Office of the Foreign Assets Control; Intelligence Research Specialist Nikeisha P. Winston of DEA’s Miami Field Division; Special Agent Bryce Jones of the Internal Revenue Service – Criminal Investigations; Diversion Investigator Lana M. Worobec of DEA’s Beijing Country Office; and Supervisory Intelligence Research Specialist Daniel E. Maxwell of DEA’s Office of Special Intelligence.

The 10th Distinguished Award is presented to the Title II Web Final Rule Team: Deputy Assistant Attorney General Jennifer E. Mathis of the Civil Rights Division; Attorney Advisor Lara S. Kaufmann of the Civil Rights Division’s Disability Rights Section; Chief Rebecca B. Bond of the Civil Rights Division’s Disability Rights Section; Trial Attorney Rebecca N. Guterman of the Civil Rights Division’s Disability Rights Section; Deputy Chief Kristin M. Stitcher of the Civil Rights Division’s Disability Rights Section; Trial Attorney Abigail A. Olson of the Civil Rights Division’s Disability Rights Section; Deputy Chief Joy Levin Welan of the Civil Rights Division’s Disability Rights Section; Attorney Advisor Badar U. Tareen of the Civil Rights Division’s Disability Rights Section; Attorney Advisor David K. Gardner of the Civil Rights Division’s Disability Rights Section; Paralegal Specialist Cameron C. Lynch of the Civil Rights Division’s Professional Development Office; Attorney Advisor Logan K. Gerrity of the Civil Rights Division’s Disability Rights Section.

The 11th Distinguished Award is presented to the Access to Justice Leadership Team: Senior Advisor Jesse Bernstein of the Office for Access to Justice; Executive Officer Shannon Munro of the Office for Access to Justice; Language Access Coordinator Claudia Castillo of the Office for Access to Justice; Senior Counsel Nikhil Ramnaney of the Office for Access to Justice; Pro Bono Program Manager Laura Klein of the Office for Access to Justice; Deputy Director of Policy Christina Smith of the Office for Access to Justice; Public Affairs Officer Lauren Lambert of the Office for Access to Justice; Acting Deputy Director of Programs David Steib of the Office for Access to Justice; Senior Advisor Kim Lopez of the Office for Access to Justice; Senior Counsel Andrew Walchuk of the Office for Access to Justice; General Counsel Catalina Martinez of the Office for Access to Justice; Acting Chief of Staff Jessa Wilcox of the Office for Access to Justice; Human Resource Liaison Nichole Miller of the Office for Access to Justice; and Executive Director of the Legal Aid Interagency Roundtable Allie Yang-Green of the Office for Access to Justice.

The 12th Distinguished Award is presented to the Fisher Team: Deputy Chief of Complex Frauds Christopher Huber for the Northern District of Georgia; Trial Attorney Richard Rolwing of the Tax Division’s Northern Criminal Enforcement Section; Trial Attorney Jessica Kraft of the Tax Division’s Southern Criminal Enforcement Section; Trial Attorney Nicholas Schilling of the Tax Division’s Southern Criminal Enforcement Section; Paralegal Robert Resto of the Tax Division’s Southern Criminal Enforcement Section; Trial Attorney Parker Tobin of the Tax Division’s Southern Criminal Enforcement Section.

The 13th Distinguished Award is presented to the Data Protection Review Court Team: Acting Director Katherine Harman-Stokes of the Office of Privacy and Civil Liberties; Program Specialist Leatha Johnson of the Office of Privacy and Civil Liberties; Senior Counsel Christina Baptista of the Office of Privacy and Civil Liberties; International Director Dylan Cors of the National Security Division’s Office of Law and Policy; Senior Counsel Hannah Mayer of the Office of Privacy and Civil Liberties; Litigation Support Specialist Maisha Treadwell of the National Security Division’s eLitigation and Data Services; Senior Counsel Andrew McFarland of the Office of Privacy and Civil Liberties; Assistant Director Nancy Anne Baugher of the Justice Management Division’s Budget Staff; Senior Counsel Jay Sinha of the Office of Privacy and Civil Liberties; Budget Analyst Peter Carlino of the Justice Management Division’s Budget Staff; Attorney Advisor Victoria Garcia of the Office of Privacy and Civil Liberties; Assistant Director Julie Homick of Justice Management Division’s Human Resources Coordination Team; Management and Program Advisor Andria Robinson-Smith of the Office of Privacy and Civil Liberties; and Program Specialist Claudia Tweed of the Justice Management Division’s Human Resource Operations.

The 14th Distinguished Award is presented to the Section 702 Reauthorization Team: Supervisory Attorney Advisor Peter J. Atlee of the National Security Division’s Office of Intelligence; Chief of Staff and Senior Counsel Susan J. Hennessey of the National Security Division’s Office of the Assistant Attorney General; Senior Counsel Andrew D. Beaty of the Office of the Deputy Attorney General; Supervisory Special Agent W. Mike Herrington of the FBI’s Office of the Director; Counselor Margot G. Benedict of the Office of the Attorney General; Counsel Hilary A. Hurd of the Office of the Deputy Attorney General; Senior Counsel Adrienne L. Benson of the Office of the Deputy Attorney General; Deputy Assistant Attorney General Melissa MacTough of the National Security Division’s Office of the Assistant Attorney General; Deputy Assistant Attorney General Nelson Slade Bond II of the Office of Legislative Affairs; Legislative Affairs Specialist Daniel J. Paviglianiti of the FBI’s Office of Congressional Affairs; Attorney Advisor Kathryn J. L. Donahue of the National Security Division’s Office of Intelligence; Supervisory Attorney Advisor Joshua T. Raines of the National Security Division’s Office of Intelligence; Press Secretary Emma M. Dulaney of the Office of Public Affairs; and Attorney Advisor James Saulino of the FBI’s Office of General Counsel.

The 15th Distinguished Award is presented to the Marathon Oil Team: Trial Attorney Jonah P. Brown of the Environment and Natural Resources Division’s Environmental Enforcement Section; Trial Attorney Vanessa M. Moore of the Environment and Natural Resources Division’s Environmental Enforcement Section; Legal Assistant Gabrielle J. James of the Environment and Natural Resources Division’s Environmental Enforcement Section; Assistant Section Chief Laura A. Thoms of the Environment and Natural Resources Division’s Environmental Enforcement Section; Paralegal Specialist Meghan R. Jones of the Environment and Natural Resources Division’s Environmental Enforcement Section.

The 16th Distinguished Award is presented to the United States v. Ross Roggio Team: Trial Attorney Scott A. Claffee National Security Division’s Counter Espionage Section; Legal Administrative Specialist Sierra Morano for the Middle District of Pennsylvania; Trial Attorney Colette L. Ford of the Criminal Division’s Office of International Affairs; Victim Witness Specialist Andrea C. Myers for the Middle District of Pennsylvania; Assistant U.S. Attorney Todd K. Hinkley for the Middle District of Pennsylvania; Legal Administrative Specialist Christina M. Nihen for the Middle District of Pennsylvania; Historian Phil Hoffman of the Criminal Division’s Human Rights & Special Prosecutions Section; Special Agent Thomas J. O’Donnell of the FBI Philadelphia Field Office; Trial Attorney Patrick Jasperse of the Criminal Division’s Human Rights & Special Prosecutions Section; Paralegal Anna Rogers of the Criminal Division’s Human Rights & Special Prosecutions Section; Trial Attorney Christian Levesque of the Criminal Division’s Human Rights & Special Prosecutions Section; and Deputy Chief Courtney Spivey Urschel of the Criminal Division’s Human Rights & Special Prosecutions Section.

The Attorney General’s Award for Exceptional Heroism recognizes a remarkable act of bravery and risk of life while performing official duties.

The Award for Exception Heroism is presented to the Carolinas Regional Fugitive Task Force: Senior Inspector Austin Acheson of the USMS Investigative Operations Division; Special Agent Arthur Philson of the ATF; Task Force Officer (Fallen) William Elliott of the USMS Investigative Operations Division; Task Force Officer (Fallen) Samuel Poloche of the USMS Investigative Operations Division; Task Force Officer Josh Funderburk of the USMS Investigative Operations Division; Task Force Officer Frankie Runyon of the USMS Investigative Operations Division; Task Force Officer Casey Hoover of the USMS Investigative Operations Division; Task Force Officer Chad Shingler of the USMS Investigative Operations Division; Task Force Officer Frank Irizarry of the USMS Investigative Operations; Deputy U.S. Marshal Joshua Shuffler for the Western District of North Carolina; Task Force Officer Collin Johnson of the USMS Investigative Operations Division; Senior Inspector Eric Tillman of the USMS Investigative Operations; Task Force Officer Samuel Laws of the USMS Investigative Operations Division; Deputy U.S. Marshal (Fallen) Thomas Weeks for the Western District of North Carolina; Senior Inspector Derek Miller of the USMS Investigative Operations Division.

The Mary C. Lawton Lifetime Service Award recognizes employees who have served at least 20 years in the Department and who have demonstrated high standards of excellence and dedication throughout their careers. This award is presented only in exceptional circumstances to those individuals of special merit and is not awarded to express general appreciation for tenure alone.

The first Mary C. Lawton Lifetime Service Award is presented to Deputy Chief Barbara “Bobbi” Bernstein of the Civil Rights Division’s Criminal Section.

The second Mary C. Lawton Lifetime Service Award is presented to General Counsel Jennifer Kaplan of the Office on Violence Against Women.

The third Mary C. Lawton Lifetime Service Award is presented to Supervisory Trial Attorney Terry Henry of the Civil Division’s Federal Programs Branch.

The fourth Mary C. Lawton Lifetime Service Award is presented to Assistant U.S. Attorney Shane Harrigan for the Southern District of California.

The fifth Mary C. Lawton Lifetime Service Award is presented to Assistant U.S. Attorney Mary Jane Stewart for the Northern District of Georgia.

The sixth Mary C. Lawton Lifetime Service Award is presented to Deputy Chief Gregg A. Maisel for the District of Columbia.

The seventh Mary C. Lawton Lifetime Service Award is presented to Senior Counsel for Appellate Matters Eric G. Hostetler of the Environment and Natural Resources Division’s Environmental Defense Section.

The eighth Mary C. Lawton Lifetime Service Award is presented to Supervisory Attorney Mary K. Butler of the Criminal Division’s Money Laundering and Asset Recovery Section.

The ninth Mary C. Lawton Lifetime Service Award is presented to Supervisory Special Agent Richard B. Marx of the FBI’s Laboratory Division.

The Edward H. Levi Award for Outstanding Professionalism and Exemplary Integrity is established to pay tribute to the memory and achievements of former Attorney General Edward H. Levi, whose career as an attorney, law professor, and dean and public servant exemplified these qualities in the best traditions of the Department. The Edward H. Levi Award for Outstanding Professionalism and Exemplary Integrity is presented to Trial Attorney Lowell V. Sturgill of the Civil Division’s Appellate Staff.

The William French Smith Award for Outstanding Contribution to Cooperative Law Enforcement was established to pay tribute to the memory and achievements of former Attorney General William French Smith for his establishment of Law Enforcement Coordinating Committees (LECCs), and his outstanding efforts in promoting law enforcement cooperation and coordination throughout the nation. It is designed to recognize state and local law enforcement officials who, through their participation in cooperative interagency efforts, have made significant contributions to law enforcement endeavors and objectives.

This award is presented to the OPERATION DISRUPT SoCal Team: Senior Trial Attorney Stephen Da Ponte of the Environment and Natural Resources Division’s Environmental Crimes Section; Special Agent Brett A. Crooks of HSI; Deputy Chief Joseph A. Poux of the Environment and Natural Resources Division’s Environmental Crimes Section; Special Agent Seidy Gaytan of HSI; Assistant Special Agent-In-Charge Benjamin M. Carr of Environmental Protection Agency’s Criminal Investigation Division; Special Agent Shawn P. Doyle of HSI; Special Agent Gabrielle M. Buda of the Environmental Protection Agency’s Criminal Investigation Division; Special Agent Ian MacLean of HSI; Special Agent Sawyer A. Rotell of the Environmental Protection Agency’s Criminal Investigation Division; Criminal Analyst Regina Soria of HSI; Special Agent Ezekiel Austin of the Environmental Protection Agency’s Criminal Investigation Division; Chief Phong Hua of U.S. Customs and Border Protection; Supervisory Special Agent Michael Lesley of HSI; Watch Commander Roberto Pagan of U.S. Customs and Border Protection; Supervising Criminal Investigator Gloria Gamino of the California Department of Toxic Substances Control.

The Attorney General’s Award for Excellence in Law Enforcement recognizes outstanding professional achievements by law enforcement officers within the Justice Department. Two Excellence in Law Enforcement Awards.

The first Award for Excellence in Law Enforcement is presented to the Charlotte Response Team: Deputy Commander Brian Alfano of the USMS’ Investigative Operations Division; Senior Inspector David Frebel Jr. of the USMS’ Investigative Operations Division; Deputy Commander Brian Montana of the USMS’ Investigative Operations Division; Task Force Officer Jamie Terry of the USMS’ Investigative Operations Division; Law Enforcement Officer Jack Blowers of the Charlotte-Mecklenburg Police Department; Law Enforcement Officer Mike Giglio of the Charlotte-Mecklenburg Police Department; Law Enforcement Officer Justin Campbell of the Charlotte-Mecklenburg Police Department; Law Enforcement Officer Christopher Tolley of the Charlotte-Mecklenburg Police Department; Enforcement Officer (Fallen) Joshua Eyer Law of the Charlotte-Mecklenburg Police Department; Task Force Officer Samuel Barksdale of the Investigative Operations Division Gastonia Police Department.

The second Award for Excellence in Law Enforcement is presented to Special Agent Kimojha “Mo” Brooks of the DEA’s North and Central America Division.

The Attorney General’s Award for Exceptional Service in Indian Country is designed to recognize extraordinary efforts to demonstrate the Department’s commitment to fight crime in Indian Country. The Award for Exceptional Service in Indian Country is presented to the Tribal Affairs Division of the Office on Violence Against Women: Grants Management Specialist Lisa M. Arnold of the Office on Violence Against Women; Grants Management Specialist Jennifer W. Marsh of the Office on Violence Against Women; Grants Management Specialist Tammy L. Ashley of the Office on Violence Against Women; Grants Management Specialist Jenny R. Mills of the Office on Violence Against Women; Grants Management Specialist Yulonda I. Candelario of the Office on Violence Against Women; Grants Management Specialist Mary A. Mummaw of the Office on Violence Against Women; Attorney Advisor Frances A. Cook of the Office on Violence Against Women; Deputy Director Sherriann C. Moore of the Office on Violence Against Women; Grants Management Specialist Samantha L. Dziatkiewicz of the Office on Violence Against Women; Grants Management Darla R. Nolan of the Specialist Office on Violence Against Women; Supervisory Grants Management Specialist Tia H. Farmer of the Office on Violence Against Women; Grants Management Specialist Cheryl “Renee” Stapp of the Office on Violence Against Women; Supervisory Grants Management Specialist Rebekah R. Jones of the Office on Violence Against Women; Grants Management Specialist Sydney L. West of the Office on Violence Against Women; Senior Grants Management Specialist Regina D. Madison of the Office on Violence Against Women.

The Attorney General’s Award for Excellence in Management recognizes outstanding administrative or managerial achievements which have significant improved operations, productivity, or reduced costs. The award is presented to Program Manager Angela D. Vandergrift of the FBI’s Criminal Justice Investigative Services.

The Attorney General’s Award for Excellence in Technology or Privacy recognizes outstanding contributions by Justice Department employees in applying information technology to improve the operations or productivity of the Department, reduce or avoid costs, or solve problems, as well as recognizing outstanding achievements in privacy law, policy, and compliance.

The first Attorney General’s Award for Excellence in Technology or Privacy was presented to the Bankruptcy Videoconference Team: Supervisory Auditor Krista G. Hale of the U.S. Trustee Program; Auditor Nicole M. Zollars of the U.S. Trustee Program.

The second Attorney General’s Award for Excellence in Technology or Privacy was presented to the DOJ National Law Enforcement Accountability Database (NLEAD) Team: Senior Counsel Jeffrey S. Nestler of the Office of the Deputy Attorney General; Director James L. Dunlap of the Justice Management Division’s Security and Emergency Planning Staff; Chief Privacy & Civil Liberties Officer (Acting) Peter A. Winn of the Office of Privacy and Civil Liberties; Assistant Director Michael W. Haas of the Justice Management Division’s Law Enforcement Services and Information Sharing; Deputy Associate Attorney General Saeed Mody of the Office of the Associate Attorney General; Senior Advisor Marissa A. Marrone of the Justice Management Division’s Human Resources Staff; Deputy Assistant Attorney General Melinda Rogers of the Justice Management Division’s Office of the Chief Information Officer; Deputy Director Brian Merrick of the Justice Management Division’s Service Delivery Staff; Deputy Assistant Attorney General Michael Williams of the Justice Management Division’s Human Resources and Administration; General Counsel Morton J. Posner of the Justice Management Division; Director Melody Armstrong of the Justice Management Division; Deputy Director F. Michael Sena Justice Management Division’s Human Resources Staff; Chief of Staff Nikki Collier of the Justice Management Division; Senior Assistant General Counsel Evelyn Tang of the Justice Management Division; Deputy Assistant Director Peter W. Crichlow of the Justice Management Division; Deputy Assistant Director Leah Taylor of the USMS; Assistant Director Eric S. Daniels of the Justice Management Division; Deputy Assistant Director Erin M. Prest of the FBI’s Office of the General Counsel; Assistant Director Swati Deb of the Justice Management Division’s Application Technical Services.

The Attorney General’s Award for Excellence in Furthering the Interests of U.S. National Security is designed to recognize a special act or service by a Department employee who has greatly contributed to protecting U.S. national security. The 2024 award is presented to T-Mobile Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States Penalty and Disclosure Team: Supervisory Attorney Advisor Eric S. Johnson of the National Security Division’s Foreign Investment Review Section; Supervisory Attorney Advisor Diane Kelleher of the Civil Division’s Federal Programs Branch; Research Support Specialist Robert A. Kaminaris of the National Security Division’s Foreign Investment Review Section; Trial Attorney James C. Luh of the Civil Division’s Federal Programs Branch; Attorney Advisor Eileen C. Keenan of the National Security Division’s Foreign Investment Review Section; Information Technology Specialist Matthew Baer of the FBI’s Operation Technology Division; Attorney Advisor Kara L. Podraza of the National Security Division’s Foreign Investment Review Section; Senior Telecommunications Specialist Michael Gray of the FBI’s Operational Technology Division; Supervisory Attorney Advisor Tyler J. Wood of the National Security Division’s Foreign Investment Review Section; Attorney Gregory Welsch of the FBI’s Operational Technology Division; and Trial Attorney Alison Zitron of the Criminal Division’s Computer Crime and Intellectual Property Section.

The Attorney General’s Award for Outstanding Service in Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Administration is designated to recognize exceptional dedication to the implementation of the Freedom of Information Act. This award is presented to the Federal Bureau of Prisons Freedom of Information Act Team: Government Information Specialist Santos Arellano of the Federal Bureau of Prisons’ North Central Regional Office; Government Information Specialist Sara Lilly of the Federal Bureau of Prisons’ Central Office; Supervisory Attorney Advisor Eugene Baime of the Federal Bureau of Prisons’ Central Office; Government Information Specialist Kristi Scarantino of the Federal Bureau of Prisons’ Federal Correctional Complex Butner; Government Information Specialist Robin Carl of the Federal Bureau of Prisons’ Western Regional Office; Government Information Specialist Shauniece White of the Federal Bureau of Prisons’ Federal Correctional Institution Fort Dix; Supervisory Government Information Specialist Kara Christenson of the Federal Bureau of Prisons’ Federal Medical Center Rochester.

The Attorney General’s Award for Equal Employment Opportunity is the Department’s highest award for performance in support of the Equal Employment Opportunity Program. This award is presented to the Beacon Project Team: Information Technology Specialist Aisha Napari Abass of the FBI Newark Field Office; Special Agent Corey G. Harris of the FBI New Orleans Field Office; Management & Program Analyst Alexis Karen Averette of the FBI’s Office of Diversity & Inclusion; Management and Program Analyst Tamika M. Harrison of the FBI’s Office of Diversity and Inclusion; Bryant Management & Program Analyst Shantuana Nicole of the FBI’s Directorate of Intelligence; Community Outreach Specialist Chiquanda D. Tillie of the FBI Columbia Field Office; Supervisory Foreign Language Program Coordinator Annie Yaitze Correa of the FBI New York Field Office; Community Outreach Specialist Stacie K. Ward of the FBI Charlotte Field Office; Management & Program Analyst Stacy Lamonte Culler of the FBI Office of Diversity and Inclusion; Management and Program Analyst Amy E. Waye of the FBI’s Office of Diversity and Inclusion; Special Agent Stacey Reid Deal of the FBI Charlotte Field Office; Applicant Recruiter/Coordinator Amani Wilson of the FBI Baltimore Field Office; Management & Program Analyst Edrienne C. Elliott-Wade of the FBI’s Office of Diversity and Inclusion; Supervisory Special Agent Kisha T. Winston of the FBI Washington Field Office; Community Outreach Specialist Marvella Gray of the FBI Baltimore Field Office.

The Attorney General’s Award for Excellence in Legal Support recognizes outstanding achievements in the field of legal support to attorneys by paralegal specialists and other legal assistants.

The first award for Excellence in Legal Support is presented to Environmental Torts Litigation Paralegal Specialist Doris Renate Epton of the Civil Division’s Torts Branch.

The second award for Excellence in Legal Support is presented to Management Analyst/Criminal Paralegal Margaret E. Jahn for the Eastern District of Virginia.

The Attorney General’s Award for Excellence in Administrative Support recognizes outstanding administrative or managerial achievements (e.g., human resources, financial management, information technology, and general non-legal administrative support). This award is presented to Paralegal Jenna Rahrle of the Office of Legislative Affairs.

The Claudia J. Flynn Award for Professional Responsibility is designed to recognize a Department attorney who has made significant contributions in professional responsibility by successfully handling a sensitive and challenging professional responsibility issue in an exemplary fashion and/or leading efforts to ensure that Department attorneys carry out their duties in accordance with the rules of professional conduct. The Claudia J. Flynn Award for Professional Responsibility is presented to Deputy Counsel Suzanne K. Drouet of the Office of Professional Responsibility.

The Attorney General’s Award for Asset Forfeiture recognizes the outstanding legal efforts or other actions by Department employees in support of the Government’s asset forfeiture programs. The Attorney General’s Award for Asset Forfeiture is presented to the Corporate Whistleblower Awards Pilot Program Team: Associate Deputy Attorney General Andrew J. Bruck of the Office of the Deputy Attorney General; Chief Policy Unit Sarah Dorsey of the Criminal Division’s Money Laundering & Asset Recovery Section; Deputy Assistant Attorney General Kevin O. Driscoll of the Criminal Division’s Office of the Assistant Attorney General; Acting Director of the Corporate Whistleblower Awards Pilot Program Patrick B. Gushue of the Criminal Division’s Money Laundering & Asset Recovery Section; Deputy Assistant Attorney General Lisa H. Miller of the Criminal Division’s Office of the Assistant Attorney General; Principal Deputy Chief Lorinda Laryea of the Criminal Division’s Fraud Section; Chief Counselor Brent Wible of the Criminal Division’s Office of the Assistant Attorney General; Chief Glenn S. Leon of the Criminal Division’s Fraud Section; Chief Margaret “Molly” Moeser of the Criminal Division’s Money Laundering & Asset Recovery Section; Principal Deputy Assistant Chief of the Health Care Fraud Unit Jacob N. Foster of the Criminal Division’s Fraud Section; Chief of the Program Management and Training Unit Jennifer Bickford of the Criminal Division’s Money Laundering & Asset Recovery Section; Assistant Chief Market Integrity & Major Fraud Unit Michael “Mike” O’Neill of the Criminal Division’s Fraud Section; Deputy Chief Program Management and Training Unit Raymond “Matt” Colon of the Criminal Division’s Money Laundering & Asset Recovery Section; and Attorney Advisor Mark H. Goldberg of the National Security Division.

The Attorney General’s Award for Fraud Prevention recognizes those who have been involved with the prevention, investigation, and prosecution of fraud and other white-collar crimes. The award is presented to the Endo Bankruptcy and Litigation Team: Assistant United States Attorney Peter Aronoff for the Southern District of New York; Assistant U.S. Attorney Tara Schwartz for the Southern District of New York; Special Agent Wende E. Bardfeld of the FBI; Trial Attorney Tara M. Shinnick of the Civil Division’s Consumer Protection Branch; Assistant U.S. Attorney Jean-David Barnea for the Southern District of New York; Diversion Investigator Stephanie K. Tait of the DEA; Assistant U.S. Attorney Alexandra Chase for the Southern District of Florida; Senior Trial Counsel Christopher Terranova of the Civil Division’s Fraud Section Commercial Litigation Branch; Trial Attorney Benjamin A. Cornfeld of the Civil Division’s Consumer Protection Branch; Supervisory Trial Attorney Kevin P. VanLandingham of the Civil Division’s Corporate/Financial Litigation; Assistant U.S. Attorney Matthew Feeley for the Southern District of Florida; Assistant Director of the Fraud Section Natalie A. Waites of the Civil Division’s Commercial Litigation Branch; Diversion Investigator Donna G. Richards of the DEA; Legal Administrative Specialist Angela Weddle for the Southern District of Florida; and Supervisory Trial Attorney Mary Schmergel of the Civil Division’s Corporate/Financial Litigation.

The Attorney General’s Award for Outstanding Contributions by a New Employee recognizes exceptional performance and notable accomplishments towards the Department’s mission by an employee with fewer than five years of federal career service.

The first Attorney General’s Award for Outstanding Contributions by a New Employee recognizes Chief Juan Castillo of the Federal Bureau of Prisons’ Human Resource Management Division, National Recruitment Office.

The second Attorney General’s Award for Outstanding Contributions by a New Employee recognizes Physical Security Specialist Nicholas R. Eubanks of the USMS Southern District of Alabama.

The Attorney General’s Award for Outstanding External Contributions recognizes individuals or teams who have demonstrated exceptional dedication and skill in fostering collaboration between government agencies and community stakeholders to enhance public safety or have rendered exceptionally helpful assistance to the Department in high-visibility litigation.

The first Attorney General’s Award for Outstanding External Contributions is presented to the Republican National Convention and Democratic National Convention Deployment Team: Conciliation Specialist Sean Barrett Community Relations Service’s South Region; Pearson Conciliation Specialist Kelly Hams of the Community Relations Service’s Midwest Region; Conciliation Specialist Kabrina W. Bass of the Community Relations Service’s Midwest Region; Conciliation Specialist Karl Jegeris of the Community Relations Service’s Midwest Region; Conciliation Specialist Joi Brown Dillard of the Community Relations Service’s South Region; Conciliation Specialist Dion Lyons of the Community Relations Service’s South Region; Conciliation Specialist Mildred Duprey de Robles of the Community Relations Service’s South Region; Conciliation Specialist Reginal M. Malden of the Community Relations Service’s South Region; Conciliation Specialist Clayton B. Fong of the Community Relations Service’s Mountain Central Region; Conciliation Specialist Kimberly L. McDonald of the Community Relations Service’s Atlantic North Region; Conciliation Specialist GusTavo A. Guerra Vasquez of the Community Relations Service’s West Region; Conciliation Specialist Michael Outlaw of the Community Relations Service’s Atlantic North Region; Conciliation Specialist Shanette Hall of the Community Relations Service’s Midwest Region; Conciliation Specialist Daniel Z. Rowe of the Community Relations Service’s South Region.

The second Attorney General’s Award for Outstanding External Contributions is the Project Safe Childhood Team: Project Safe Childhood Program Specialist Karen Legace for the District of Massachusetts; Assistant U.S. Attorney Anne Paruti for the District of Massachusetts; Special Agent Jennifer L. Gerega of the FBI Boston Field Office; Special Agent Matthew G. Fontaine of the FBI Boston Field Office; Special Agent Edward Bradstreet of HSI; Special Agent Virginia B. Toulouse of the FBI Boston Field Office; Special Agent Andrew Kelleher of HSI; Trooper DeShawn Brown Trooper of the Massachusetts State Police.

The John Marshall Awards are the Department’s highest awards presented to attorneys for contributions and excellence in specialized areas of legal performance.

The first John Marshall Award for Excellence in Litigation is presented to the United States v. Aldrich Prosecution Team: Victim Witness Coordinator Debbie Azua-Dillehay for the District of Colorado; Special Agent Ryan Molinari of ATF; Auditor Dana Chamberlin for the District of Colorado; Victim Specialist Alicia Wagner of the FBIE Denver Field Office; Assistant U.S. Attorney Alison Connaughty for the District of Colorado; Special Agent Jason R. Walter of the FBI Denver Field Office; Assistant U.S. Attorney Bryan Fields for the District of Colorado; Trial Attorney Maura D. White of the Civil Rights Division’s Criminal Section; and Special Agent Justin Kempf of the FBI Denver Field Office.

The second John Marshall Award is presented to the United States v. Westchester Joint Water Works Team: Assistant U.S. Attorney Samuel H. Dolinger for the Southern District of New York and Assistant U.S. Attorney Tomoko Onozawa for the Southern District of New York.

The third John Marshall Award is presented to the Aimenn Penny Investigation and Prosecution Team: Assistant U.S. Attorney Brian S. Deckert for the Northern District of Ohio; Special Agent Patrick B. Lentz of the FBI Cleveland Field Office; Special Agent Stacey Griggs of the FBI Cleveland Field Office; Intelligence Analyst Wendi Parker of the FBI Cleveland Field Office; Special Operations Specialist Megan Hixon of the FBI Cleveland Field Office; Assistant U.S. Attorney Matthew W. Shepherd for the Northern District of Ohio; Victim Witness Specialist Allison A. Kretz for the Northern District of Ohio; Special Agent Lane R. Thorum for the FBI Cleveland Field Office; Supervisory Special Agent Jacob C. Kunkle of the FBI’s Criminal Investigative Division; Special Agent Cleveland Nicholas H. Visnich of the FBI Field Office.

The fourth John Marshall Award is presented to the United States v. Andrew Fahie Prosecution Team: Trial Attorney Shane Butland Criminal Division’s Fraud Section; Assistant U.S. Attorney Sean T. McLaughlin for the Southern District of Florida; Assistant U.S. Attorney Kevin D. Gerarde for the Southern District of Florida; and Assistant U.S. Attorney Frederic (Fritz) Shadley for the Southern District of Florida.

The fifth John Marshall Award is presented to the Columbia River System Team: Senior Trial Attorney Michael R. Eitel of the Environment and Natural Resources Division’s Wildlife and Marine Resources Section; Senior Trial Attorney Romney S. Philpott of the Environment and Natural Resources Division’s Natural Resources Section; Trial Attorney David S. Frankel of the Environment and Natural Resources Division’s Appellate Section; Senior Trial Attorney Frederick H. Turner of the Environment and Natural Resources Division’s Wildlife and Marine Resources Section.

The sixth John Marshall Award is presented to the Binance Investigation and Prosecution Team: Trial Attorney Elizabeth R. Carr of the Criminal Division’s Money Laundering & Asset Recovery Section; Trial Attorney Alexander H. Wharton of the National Security Division’s Counterintelligence and Export Control Section; Deputy Chief of the Bank Integrity Unit Kevin G. Mosley Criminal Division’s Money Laundering & Asset Recovery Section; Assistant U.S. Attorney Michael W. Dion for the Western District of Washington; Trial Attorney Victor R. Salgado of the Criminal Division’s Money Laundering & Asset Recovery Section; Assistant U.S. Attorney Julia E. Jarrett for the District of Oregon; Deputy Chief Matthew A. Anzaldi of the National Security Division’s Nation Security Cyber Section; Assistant U.S. Attorney Jonas B. Lerman for the Western District of Washington; and Trial Attorney Beau Barnes of the National Security Division’s Counterintelligence and Export Control Section.

The John Marshall Award for Providing Legal Advice is presented to the Securing the Border Team: Attorney-Advisor Amanda Chuzi of the Office of Legal Counsel; Attorney-Advisor Louis Katz of the Office of Legal Counsel; Attorney-Advisor Jon Cowles of the Executive Office for Immigration Review’s Office of Policy, Immigration Law Division; Attorney-Advisor Mark Krass of the Office of Legal Counsel; Attorney-Advisor Conor Craft of the Office of Legal Counsel; Attorney-Advisor Lucas Lallinger of the Office of Legal Counsel; Attorney-Advisor Lauren Gallenstein of the Executive Office for Immigration Review’s Office of Policy, Immigration Law Division; Attorney-Advisor Grace Leeper of the Office of Legal Counsel; Attorney-Advisor Naomi Gilens of the Office of Legal Counsel; Attorney-Advisor Robert Charles Merritt of the Office of Legal Counsel; Attorney-Advisor Samantha Goldstein of the Office of Legal Counsel; Attorney-Advisor Dina Mishra of the Office of Legal Counsel; Honors Program Attorney Emily Gorrivan of the Executive Office for Immigration Review’s Office of Policy, Immigration Law Division; Counsel Nicholas Nasrallah of the Office of Legal Counsel; Senior Litigation Counsel Christina Greer of the Civil Division’s Office of Immigration Litigation; Attorney-Advisor Mariette Peltier of the Office of Legal Counsel; Special Counsel Rosemary Hart of the Office of Legal Counsel; Attorney-Advisor Caitlin E. Whaley of the Executive Office for Immigration Review’s Office of Policy, Immigration Law Division; and Supervisory Attorney Raechel J. Horowitz of the Executive Office for Immigration Review’s Office of Policy, Immigration Law Division.

The John Marshall Award for Appellate Litigation is presented to Trial Attorney David M. Lieberman of the Criminal Division’s Appellate Section.

Antitrust Division Releases 10-Year Workload Statistics Report

Source: United States Department of Justice Criminal Division

The Justice Department’s Antitrust Division today issued its 10-year workload statistics report, summarizing the Division’s work enforcing the federal antitrust laws from 2015 through 2024. These statistics can be found here.

The report reflects the critical enforcement and advocacy work the Antitrust Division has done on behalf of American consumers, taxpayers, and workers. This includes efforts to put a stop to conduct by monopolists or groups of competitors that harm consumers and workers; block mergers that threaten competition; prosecute anticompetitive crimes; ensure proper application of the antitrust laws in courts throughout the United States; and advocate for pro-competition policies across federal and state governments and with other countries.

More information about the Antitrust Division can be found at www.justice.gov/atr.

Security News: Antitrust Division Releases 10-Year Workload Statistics Report

Source: United States Department of Justice 2

The Justice Department’s Antitrust Division today issued its 10-year workload statistics report, summarizing the Division’s work enforcing the federal antitrust laws from 2015 through 2024. These statistics can be found here.

The report reflects the critical enforcement and advocacy work the Antitrust Division has done on behalf of American consumers, taxpayers, and workers. This includes efforts to put a stop to conduct by monopolists or groups of competitors that harm consumers and workers; block mergers that threaten competition; prosecute anticompetitive crimes; ensure proper application of the antitrust laws in courts throughout the United States; and advocate for pro-competition policies across federal and state governments and with other countries.

More information about the Antitrust Division can be found at www.justice.gov/atr.

Defense News: SECNAV Surface Navy Association Remarks

Source: United States Navy

Good afternoon, everyone! 

Thank you, Vice Admiral Jackson, for that kind introduction and for your 32 years of distinguished service to our United States Navy. As a fellow Naval Academy grad and one of the first women to serve on combatants, you have blazed a trail for so many to follow. Thank you for your continued leadership of our surface warriors.

Secretary Mabus, it is wonderful to see you here today. Thank you for your exceptional dedication to our Department as a surface warfare officer and as 75th Secretary of the Navy.

I would also like to extend a special welcome to Commander Everett Alvarez, Jr.

Commander Alvarez was once Lieutenant Junior Grade Alvarez and endured eight and half years as a prisoner in the infamous “Hanoi Hilton” during the Vietnam War.

Sir, thank you for being here today, and thank you for all you have done for our Nation.

I am also honored to welcome and recognize Marine Corporal Kyle Carpenter. 

On November 21st, 2010, while serving with Fox Company, 2nd Battalion, 9th Marines in Afghanistan, Corporal Carpenter was manning a rooftop security post when the Taliban launched a grenade attack. 

In an act of extraordinary bravery, he threw himself onto a grenade to protect his fellow Marine. 

For his actions, he was awarded the Medal of Honor.

Mr. Carpenter, thank you for your presence this afternoon.

And to all of the distinguished guests, Flag and General Officers, senior enlisted leaders, and fellow surface warfare officers here with us today—welcome. 

It is wonderful to join you here at the Surface Navy Association’s National Symposium—an event I have attended for many years throughout my lifetime—to gather with friends and peers from all across our Navy.

However, this year, it is also bittersweet to address you, my friends, for the final time as your 78th Secretary of the Navy.

When I took office three and a half years ago, the world was changing at a pace unlike anything we had seen before. 

From the threat of terrorism in distant regions to the rise of state-sponsored aggression on the high seas, the role of our Navy and Marine Corps in safeguarding America’s interests became more critical than ever.

Yet, with every challenge we faced, we witnessed the unwavering strength, skill, and innovation of our Sailors and Marines. 

Together, we achieved significant milestones—advancing modernization efforts while strengthening both the size and capability of our fleet.

And we have refined and adapted our focus on future readiness, ensuring that our Sailors and Marines are equipped with cutting-edge technology and training to meet the challenges of the 21st century and beyond.

It is that same ability to adapt that has kept our Navy and Marine Corps at the forefront of technology and innovation since its inception nearly 250 years ago. 

And it is no different today than it was in 1961 when President John F. Kennedy took office, the year I was born.

Locked in a tense Cold War, President Kennedy faced a nuclear arms race spawned by the Soviet Union’s development of nuclear weapons. 

The threat of mutually assured destruction profoundly reshaped the way he viewed military strategy, and he understood that the U.S. military would need to evolve and adapt to maintain a credible deterrence against Soviet aggression. 

President Kennedy prioritized the development of strategic nuclear capabilities, notably through the expansion and modernization of the U.S. Navy’s nuclear submarine fleet. 

Then-Chief of Naval Operations Admiral Arleigh Burke had already envisioned a future in which nuclear power fueled future U.S. submarines, as well as aircraft carriers and surface combatants.

In the late 1950s, he created the Fleet Ballistic Missile Program which brought both Polaris submarines and their revolutionary weapons systems from drawing board to deployment in just five years.

The Polaris program became a cornerstone of Kennedy’s U.S. nuclear strategy, offering second-strike capabilities that would make it nearly impossible for the Soviets to wipe out the U.S. nuclear arsenal in a surprise attack.

Then, on October 16, 1962, the United States and the Soviet Union began an unprecedented and dangerous 13-day confrontation. 

Ironically, later that month, I would come to the United States as a Cuban refugee.

The threat of nuclear war loomed closer than ever.

Until the Navy’s surface warriors took station. 

Led by Chief of Naval Operations Admiral George Anderson and commander-in-chief of the Atlantic Fleet, Admiral Robert Dennison, U.S. Navy destroyers and frigates intercepted merchant ships and soviet submarines enroute to Cuba, proving Anderson’s word to Kennedy: “The Navy will not let you down.”

The Navy’s courage and performance in this crisis illustrated the critical importance of our naval forces to national defense and strategy.

The Navy continues to demonstrate that courage and performance today.

In the Red Sea, our ships—and the Sailors and Marines aboard them—have experienced the most intense combat since World War Two, courageously placing themselves in our adversary’s weapons engagement zone to protect innocent merchant shipping.

Our surface ships have intercepted hundreds upon hundreds of Houthi and Iranian missiles in defense of themselves, merchant shipping, and Israel.

These are not just statistics—they are a testament to your incredible skill, courage, and dedication.

Men and women like all of you are standing the watch, day in and day out, facing constant danger with unwavering resolve.

We should all take immense pride in their accomplishments—and be inspired by their strength and resilience.

Because of your courageous and tireless aggressive efforts, you have provided your President and Commander-in-Chief the decision space to finally achieve the necessary cease fire, just announced hours ago.

Thank you.

However, our challenge is not only about maintaining naval superiority, but also ensuring that the U.S. military is prepared to confront the evolving threats posed by the People’s Republic of China, especially in the realms of advanced technology, maritime claims, and military modernization.

Much like President Kennedy’s recognition of the need for a modernized nuclear deterrent, today’s Navy and Marine Corps must continue to adapt, leveraging both manned and unmanned capabilities to counter the PRC’s growing naval and technological advances.

That is why, over a year and a half ago, at Harvard University’s John. F. Kennedy School of Government, I introduced my vision for a new National Maritime Statecraft to prevail in an era of intense strategic competition.

This vision emphasizes innovative approaches to shipbuilding, maintenance, and repair, requiring collaboration across the entire U.S. government and partnerships with both public and private maritime sectors.

The goal is to build awareness and understanding that solving the Navy’s long-term challenges relies on renewing the health of our Nation’s broader seapower ecosystem.

And we achieve these goals by building a culture of warfighting excellence—by empowering our Sailors and Marines to continually learn and develop their skills, investing in acquisition programs, and advancing research that ensures we remain the most powerful Navy in the world.

As I have said many times before, innovation must permeate every level of our Department, inspiring and empowering individuals to drive transformative change.

We must focus on modern, mission-centric innovations such as unmanned autonomous systems, artificial intelligence, and cybersecurity. 

It is no secret that the PRC, Russia, and Iran have made consistent strides in developing their drone fleets.

We must continue to do the same.  

We must continue to adapt and utilize our autonomous fleet to mitigate the strain on human personnel, reduce operating costs, and offer an effective way to increase presence without overextending manpower.

Our unmanned air, surface, and underwater vehicles can operate for hours, days, or even weeks at a time, performing reconnaissance, surveillance, and intelligence-gathering tasks without the need of crewed vessels or aircraft—that is our modern-day Navy.

And a crucial step towards the integration of autonomous systems is the establishment of the Navy’s newest rating in more than two decades, the Robotics Warfare Specialist. 

Since its inception in March, nearly 300 Sailors have converted to the rating, providing the Navy with operators, maintainers, and managers who can plan and control the operations of robotics systems. 

And innovation also extends to naval logistics.

At my direction, we have successfully demonstrated the Transferable Rearming Mechanism, or TRAM, which will enable our warships to reload their Vertical Launching Systems through connected underway replenishment. 

I announced TRAM at this very conference two years ago.

Ensuring the Navy has the capability to rearm ships at sea has been a priority of mine dating back to when I was still on active duty. 

TRAM surpassed expectations, completing successful operations in Sea State 4 from its very first day of at-sea testing onboard USS Chosin (CG 65) and USNS Washington Chambers (T-AKE 11). 

This critical capability will significantly increase our ability to maintain forward presence without the need to withdraw from combat for extended periods of in-port reloading time.

I have the highest confidence that our skilled Sailors, civilian mariners, and industry partners will continue to press forward on this capability and field it for sustained persistent forward-strike capacity during wartime long after my tenure as Secretary. 

And our commitment to innovation has already begun to pay dividends to strengthen maritime dominance for our surface fleet.

As we gather here today, we have 93 ships under contract and 56 in construction, including Ford-class aircraft carriers, Constellation-class frigates, San Antonio-class LPDs, Arleigh Burke-class destroyers, Columbia-class SSBNs, and Virginia-class SSNs.

Last fall, the Department of the Navy awarded contracts for procurement of one America-class amphibious assault ship (LHA) and three San Antonio-class amphibious transport dock (LPD) ships.

In addition to our amphibious ship procurement, the Department of the Navy also awarded a Multi-Ship Contract to procure eight T-AO ships.

These multi-billion-dollar contracts represent a forward-leaning approach to innovation, providing critical investment in our shipbuilding infrastructure.

In a significant milestone, USS Zumwalt (DDG 1000) has recently been undocked and received the Conventional Prompt Strike upgrade, greatly enhancing its combat capabilities.

And today, the Littoral Combat Ship is equipped with the Naval Strike Missile, a long-range precision strike weapon. Additionally, the integration of the MK 70 Payload Delivery System with Vertical Launching System technology is ongoing and will give us tremendous firepower and even more tactical advantage over our adversaries.

Our commitment to innovation is not new—it has always been the cornerstone of our success.

Carvel planking, cannons, sextants, and steam power were once the cutting-edge technologies of their time.

These innovations have since evolved into steel hulls, missiles, radar, nuclear propulsion, satellite communications, and navigation—each leap forward defining a new era of naval power and capability.

The future demands that we not only embrace but actively drive the evolution of technology—our progress lays the groundwork for prosperity and success for generations to come.

We also recognize that no nation can achieve success through platforms and technology alone. 

We must continue to enhance strategic partnerships across our world’s oceans and at sea.

In my time as Secretary, the Department of the Navy has placed a greater emphasis on integrated, forward-deployed forces, including rotational deployments in Australia, Japan, Guam, and other strategic locations. 

These efforts reflect a broader strategy to contain the PRC’s growing influence in the South China Sea and beyond, mirroring Kennedy’s approach to maintaining a credible military presence to deter Soviet aggression.

Through the generational AUKUS agreement, we are fostering deeper cooperation in the Indo-Pacific region and collaborating on advanced technologies that ensure our three nations maintain a technological edge over our adversaries.  

By securing access to cutting-edge technologies, AUKUS nations can better monitor, detect, and neutralize threats posed by China’s advancements in military technology.

Beyond the direct technological advancements, the pact strengthens the broader network of security partnerships in the Indo-Pacific. 

As we celebrate the 250th anniversary of our Navy and Marine Corps this year, we are reminded of the incredible journey we have undertaken. 

Yet, we focus our fix firmly on the next 250 years, where continued innovation and bold leadership will ensure that we remain at the forefront of global maritime power.

And as we reflect on the importance and impact of innovation within our Navy, we must also acknowledge that it is our people who drive these advancements and build our relationships.

It is our people who will continue to shape the future of naval warfare, technology, and operations.

In order to continue to attract and retain the best, our Surface Navy must foster leadership that prioritizes mentorship, cultivates meaningful connections, and supports personal and professional development—ultimately ensuring every surface warfare officer has the opportunity to thrive in this demanding calling.

And this culture of mentorship, connection, and development must endure long after the end of this symposium—after we’ve finished exchanging business cards and sea stories here in our Nation’s capital.

Every surface warfare officer should take pride in their craft—what you do each and every day is anything but ordinary, as evidenced by our daily performance in the Red Sea.

Our pride is rooted in the legacy of selfless service and sacrifice given by those who have gone before us—leaders who exemplified the honor and resilience which define our Navy’s ethos. 

Service is not an obligation; it is a privilege—a chance to be a part of something greater than ourselves and to uphold the values which define us as a country.

Service is not merely a job or a career; it is a fundamental aspect of our democracy, deeply ingrained in the very fabric of our Nation.

Together, we build on this foundation, ensuring the next generation of Sailors and Marines is prepared to carry our mission forward with the same unwavering resolve.

Since I entered office, I have taken seriously my congressionally-mandated responsibility of naming the ships that will navigate the world’s oceans, deter aggression from hostile threats, and serve as symbols of security and stability around the globe.

And so today, at my final Surface Navy Association Symposium as Secretary of the Navy, I am honored to announce four new ships which represent the future of our fleet.

The newest Arleigh Burke-class guided-missile destroyers will be USS Ray Mabus (DDG 147), USS Kyle Carpenter (DDG 148), and USS Robert R. Ingram (DDG 149).

And the newest Constellation-class guided-missile frigate will be USS Everett Alvarez Jr. (FFG 68).

These ships will be critical to our combat effectiveness, equipping us with modern capabilities to operate across all domains in which we are called.

Everywhere these ships sail, they will represent the legacies of four leaders and heroes who placed country over self and service above all.

And these ships will chart a course toward a future where the United States Navy remains the most advanced, capable, and innovative maritime force in the world.

As my time as Secretary comes to a close, I implore all of you here today—especially the junior surface warfare officers in the room—to “sharpen your sword.”

Always lead with character and integrity.

Always tell the truth, and strive to inspire those you lead.

Hone your skills, drive emerging technologies, and ensure you understand what it takes to operate in contested environments and maintain superiority at sea. 

Three and a half years ago, I knew that we were at a critical juncture in the history of our Navy and Marine Corps, facing an increasingly complex and competitive global environment. 

Yet, it is clear to me that our Sailors and Marines, and particularly our surface forces, have risen to meet those challenges head-on.

Together, we have built a more agile, more lethal, more capable, and more modern force, from the integration of advanced systems to the ongoing efforts to sustain and expand our readiness. 

But none of this progress would be possible without the men and women who are the heart and soul of our Navy and who serve with excellence every single day—each of you. 

You are the backbone of our fleet. 

You are the ones who project power, protect our interests, and secure freedom of navigation across the world’s oceans. 

You are the ones who stand the watch, ensuring that our Navy can respond swiftly and decisively to any threat, anywhere on the globe. 

And it is your relentless dedication and commitment to mission success that allow us to maintain the global influence we have today.

The challenges ahead will require us to be faster, smarter, and more adaptive than ever before. 

And though I may be leaving, my pride in you, my belief in you, and my support for you will never waver.

I look forward to watching you all achieve even greater heights in the years to come.

Thank you all for your commitment to the Department of the Navy, the maritime services, and indeed our Nation.

As I close out my time as your 78th Secretary, please know that it has been the honor of my life to serve you, and please know that my wife Betty and I will always carry you in our hearts and prayers till our dying days.

May God continue to bless our Sailors, Marines, Civilians, and their families stationed around the globe with fair winds and following seas.

Defense News: SECNAV NWC Farewell Address

Source: United States Navy

Greetings to the staff and esteemed members of our Naval War College family.

Admiral Walker, thank you for your years of distinguished service in the United States Navy, and for your stewardship of the Naval War College.

And I welcome the Education for Seapower Advisory Board—thank you for being here today. Thank you for the significant successes you have achieved in our Naval Education Strategy. Your insights and recommendations to the larger Naval University System have paved a clear path forward for our Department.

It is an honor to address you today I bid farewell to a role, a mission, and a calling which have profoundly shaped my life.

I am sorry I could not be with you in person today, but time is not on my side. 

As a Naval Officer, I too had the opportunity to study and learn at the War College—I earned my master’s degree in National Security Studies and proudly attest that this is the place I really learned how to first think, and then write. 

I am proud to be the first ever graduate of the Naval War College to serve as Secretary of the Navy.

As I close out my time in this role, it is only natural for me to return to this institution which was so crucial to my own professional development.

As I reflect on everything we’ve accomplished over the past three years, I’d like to share a few parting thoughts on some of the enduring precepts of seapower that I hope you will bear in mind as you prepare to face challenges to come.

As you likely know, we at the Naval War College just celebrated our 140th anniversary.  

Let me anchor here for a moment and tell you briefly about the context of how our institution came to be.

The era of our institution’s founding is one I have thought about often as Secretary of the Navy. I think there is a lot we can learn from this period, and you can tell me if any part of this story sounds at all familiar to you.

In October 1884, Secretary of the Navy William Chandler issued General Order #324, directing Rear Admiral Stephen B. Luce to establish the Naval War College.

At the time, the United States was coming off a two-decade period of underinvestment in the foundations of its seapower.

During the Civil War, a large percentage of the U.S. Merchant Marine had been either sunk by Confederate raiders or preemptively sold off to foreign flags to avoid destruction.

Similarly, after the highly successful fleet expansion to meet the requirements of the Anaconda Plan in the Civil War, the U.S. Navy decayed as the nation turned inward to pursue westward continental development after the war was won.

This neglect led to a rude geopolitical awakening in 1882, when the U.S. government was forced to abandon an attempt to pressure Chile to the peace table in its War of the Pacific against Peru and Bolivia.

Washington suddenly recognized that the Chilean Navy far outmatched the U.S. Navy’s outdated force of 20-year-old Civil War leftovers.

That reckoning led to a national, multi-decade effort to rejuvenate the nation’s seapower.

Within a year, the Department of the Navy ordered its first steel ships and created the Office of Naval Intelligence to collect insights on new technologies and best practices from foreign navies.

And so it was in that context, two years after we realized that we had a problem, that we founded the Naval War College.

Over the years that followed, visionary naval thinkers and leaders like Theodore Roosevelt, Stephen B. Luce, and Alfred Thayer Mahan came together in Newport to conjure and plan America’s new steel battlefleet.

Thanks to their work, the U.S. Navy was able to dominate in the Spanish American War, deter the Imperial German Navy from coercing Venezuela at the turn of the century, and then steam around the world in a show of might and logistical reach.

Once we committed ourselves to the task, it wasn’t long before we had built “a navy second to none.”

The Naval War College, and indeed seapower itself, has never been so urgently essential as it is today.

The 21st century is a maritime century. When economists talk about how the world has never been more interconnected, they are talking about humanity’s use of the sea.

There are more ships on the world’s oceans today than there ever have been in recorded history.

The number of ships larger than 1000 deadweight tons has more than doubled just in the past 25 years, to nearly 60,000 ships.

In that same timeframe overall world fleet tonnage has quadrupled to more than 2.3 billion tons.

For perspective, 100 years ago, the entire world fleet would be a rounding error of the world fleet today. 

More than 90% of global trade volume travels by sea.

And while we refer to the internet as “in the cloud,” in reality the internet is in the water—over 95% of global communications pass through undersea cables.

As British Rear Admiral Chris Parry observed at the Current Strategy Forum a few years ago, the ocean is the original, physical incarnation of the internet.

This is to say, with sufficient fuel and supplies, a ship can put to sea and travel to any other continent.

America in particular depends on freedom of the seas for economic and military access to the overwhelming majority of the world’s populations and markets.

The United States is effectively an island. You all know how to read a chart, so you know more than most that if we want to go anywhere beyond Canada or Mexico, we must travel on or over the ocean.

This is why the freedom of the seas has been a foundational American national interest since the earliest days of our republic.

Our Navy and Marine Corps exist to defend free seas and protect our interests abroad.

And our Navy-Marine Corps Team is the single most versatile instrument of national power we have.

By virtue of the physical properties of buoyancy, warships can bring a greater volume and sophistication of combat capability faster, more cost-effectively, and with greater flexibility and persistence than any other form of military force.

Combat effectiveness remains the fundamental prerequisite for the exercise of naval power.

We see this in the Red Sea again today, as the Houthis continue to launch indiscriminate attacks on civilian merchant vessels of all countries, as well as unprovoked air and missile assaults on U.S. warships.

And our Sailors and Marines continue to demonstrate incredible skill in taking their ships and aircraft into battle.

These Houthi attacks are not routine by any measure—in the Red Sea, we are engaged in the longest sustained naval combat operations we have faced since the Second World War.

At the same time, we must not forget that our role does not begin and end with combat. Navies have an enduring function in peacetime competition as well as wartime.

The Navy’s Title X mission codifies our enduring role in “the peacetime promotion of the national security interests and prosperity of the United States.”

Naval forces are unique in their ability to achieve positive political and economic objectives—enabling us to prevail without ever having to fight.

This is particularly important in a world where we have multiple adversaries employing strategies designed to advance revisionist objectives without triggering a conventional armed response by the United States.

The People’s Republic of China is one of the most notable examples of this approach.

The PRC is pursuing a dual-track strategy, both preparing its military for a possible future war while working to “win without fighting” today through its coercive maritime insurgency in the South China Sea.

The disparate nature of these challenges mean that our forces must be both combat credible and competition-credible.

The requirements of combat and peacetime competition stress different aspects of what naval forces bring to the table.

For example, while combat credibility depends primarily on our ability to bring decisive firepower to bear on a target from range, competition credibility depends at least as much on our ability to persist on station in contested waters and at close quarters in support of our local allies and partners.

As the Naval War College’s own Professor James Holmes put it—“want to compete? You have to be there.”

Our continuing operations shoulder-to-shoulder with our Philippine partners within their Exclusive Economic Zone, including through Multilateral Maritime Cooperative Activities alongside the navies of the Philippines, Japan, Australia, Canada, and New Zealand are good examples of us showing up for our partners when and where it counts.

To this end, it helps that navies are different from other kinds of forces in that we can be persistently present at sea, fully ready for any contingency, without the need of the hospitality of a host country.

And at the same time, navies are welcomed into other countries in ways that different kinds of forces are not.

Similarly, consider the effect of a port visit by a carrier strike group or an amphibious ready group—something most of us are familiar with.

Port visits are an essential tool of naval diplomacy which we have used to strategic effect during my tenure.

Not long after Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, the USS Kearsarge and her group played a key role in reassuring our partners in the Baltic of the U.S. commitment, while deterring opportunistic aggression.

This was particularly salient in the case of Sweden and Finland as they finalized their entry into NATO.

Moreover, port visits have a profound impact in deepening the bonds of our alliances.

Our Sailors and Marines heading ashore on liberty and interacting with the local community infuses direct, personal goodwill into the bilateral relationship.

It injects tangible stimulus into the local economy that continues to help build local prosperity long after we slip our moorings to get back underway.

No other form of national power can have that unreserved positive impact on our friends, in addition to the deterrent signal it sends to potential adversaries.

An armored division rolling through city streets or a bomber wing flying overhead send rather different political messages than ships sailing into the harbor for a port visit with flags flying.

This is yet another reason why I have advocated so forcefully to strengthen our maritime power as your Secretary of the Navy.

Naval diplomacy is one of the most powerful tools at our disposal to not only navigate, but also calm troubled waters around the world.

My role as your Secretary of the Navy is to man, train, and equip our naval forces so they can be ready and available to our nation’s leaders.

And as I suggested earlier, the situation we found ourselves in during the crisis with Chile back in 1882 probably sounds eerily familiar to most people in this audience.

After I entered office as Secretary of the Navy, it was clear to me that our country is once again recovering from a multi-decade period of underinvestment in the foundations of our seapower.

Following the shortsighted decision by then-President Reagan to cut off government support to our maritime industry in 1981, our merchant marine and commercial shipbuilding sectors dwindled.

Post-Cold War defense consolidation eliminated much of the competition that’s necessary to have a healthy domestic shipbuilding marketplace.

These twin developments are existential for those of us in the Navy, because history demonstrates that no great naval power has long endured without also being a great commercial maritime power.

And as British naval historian and geostrategist Sir Julian Corbett opined, “It is upon the navy that the military position of a country primarily depends.”

For the first time in a century, we face in the PRC a comprehensive maritime competitor.

This has framed my approach to my time in office as Secretary of the Navy.

We began moving out on an aggressive and innovative strategy to reinvest in the sinews of our maritime power beginning with my speech to Columbia University in December 2022.

And in September 2023, in my speech to Harvard’s Kennedy School of Government, I officially introduced this strategy by its formal name: A new National Maritime Statecraft.

Our National Maritime Statecraft encompasses not only naval diplomacy and maritime competition, but a whole-of government effort to build comprehensive U.S. and allied maritime power, both commercial and naval.

Our National Maritime Statecraft depends on a strong Navy and Marine Corps as well as active engagement in areas of economic development, trade, education, science, innovation, and climate diplomacy to enable us to compete on a global scale.

Making naval shipbuilding more cost effective requires that we restore the competitiveness of U.S. commercial shipping and shipbuilding, reversing the decline of those industries since the 1980s.

This is why I have mounted a comprehensive advocacy campaign outside the lifelines of the Department, meeting with cabinet leaders across this administration.

The goal of this effort has been to build awareness and understanding that the long-term solutions to many of the Navy’s challenges requires we renew the health of our nation’s broader seapower ecosystem.

I drove the creation of the Government Shipbuilder’s Council, which brings us together with MARAD, Coast Guard, NOAA, and yes, even the Army, to tackle common challenges in ship construction and maintenance.

We catalyzed multiple White House-led interagency processes on both naval and commercial shipbuilding, bringing together the National Security Council, National Economic Council, and departments across the Executive Branch. 

My staff and I have been working in close support with the Maritime Administration to deliver a new National Maritime Strategy.

And we have worked very closely with partners in Congress on both sides of the aisle to reinvigorate existing but unfunded authorities and craft new incentives to build and flag commercial ships in the United States.

The result of this extensive bipartisan, bicameral collaboration is the SHIPS for America Act—a critical piece of legislation announced in September and officially introduced in Congress last month.

This bill is a major milestone in our Maritime Statecraft, and I look forward to the day it is signed into law.

We expect these efforts will offer significant returns to Navy shipbuilding and sealift.

And I am pleased to say that Maritime Statecraft has gone global.

In February, I traveled to the Republic of Korea and Japan where I met with top executives of some of the world’s most technologically advanced and prolific dual-use commercial and naval shipyards. 

These companies are recognized leaders of the global shipbuilding industry, and their presence in the United States could introduce new competitive dynamics, renowned innovation, and unrivaled industrial capacity within the domestic shipbuilding market.

During each of these engagements, I brought to the table a simple, yet profound opportunity and message: invest in America.

In June, Hanwha announced they had reached an agreement to purchase the Philly Shipyard.

You may have also heard the good news that Hanwha successfully closed the deal and completed their purchase last month.

Hanwha has declared their intent to expand the yard’s facilities, update its technology, double the size of the workforce, and quadruple the output to compete for both commercial and naval shipbuilding contracts.

I am hopeful that Hanwha will be just the first of many world-class shipbuilders to come to America and take part in our country’s maritime renaissance.

We are also working on several initiatives to leverage the shipbuilding intellectual capital of our allies and partners.

In June, the White House announced the Icebreaker Collaboration Effort or ICE Pact—an enhanced trilateral partnership amongst Canada, Finland, and the United States.

ICE Pact will leverage shipyards in these countries to build polar icebreakers for their own use while also working closely to build and export polar icebreakers for the needs of allies and partners.

And to rebuild our cadres of naval architects, we facilitated a new educational partnership with the University of Michigan, Seoul National University, and HD Hyundai Heavy Industries.

As our long-term strategy kicks into gear, at my direction, we are moving out aggressively on measures to make our current fleet more formidable.

Rear Admiral Henry Eccles, “the Clausewitz of Logistics,” namesake of the Naval War College library, and mentor of my own mentor John Hattendorf, wrote that “the essence of flexibility is in the mind of the commander. The substance of flexibility is in logistics.”

This is why I have prioritized a series of logistics innovations to make our ships more present, available, and lethal.

At my direction, we have successfully demonstrated the Transferable Rearming Mechanism, or TRAM, which will enable our warships to reload their Vertical Launching Systems through connected underway replenishment. 

TRAM surpassed expectations, including successful operations in Sea State 4 from its very first day of at-sea testing onboard USS Chosin (CG 65) and USNS Washington Chambers (T-AKE 11). 

This represents a revolution in contemporary naval logistics.  

Up to now only our carriers and big deck amphibs could fully rearm their main batteries at sea.

TRAM will enable all of our surface combatants with Vertical Launching Systems to do the same.

This will allow our destroyers to relentlessly pummel any adversary with an overwhelming volume and tempo of long-range strikes.

Studies show that a true VLS at-sea rearming capability increases the effective size of our fleet by as much as 40%.

Once fielded across the fleet, TRAM will be an investment that provides tens of billions of dollars in value to the taxpayer. 

The TRAM revolution holds significant implications for future naval force design.

The Naval War College will have a major role to play in fully exploring how the composition of the future fleet should evolve to take advantage of this technological breakthrough.

You at the U.S. Naval War College are the architects of our nation’s maritime strategy. 

Maritime Statecraft must continue to evolve as a long-term vision for our maritime power—one that considers the interplay of political, economic, technological, and environmental factors.

I urge each of you to take ownership of the idea of Maritime Statecraft. Continue to iterate on it. Take it to the next level.

We need a robust analytical framework to assess risks, identify opportunities, and develop innovative solutions.

This means investing in education and training programs that develop the critical thinking, analytical skills, and foresight necessary to navigate the complexities of the 21st-century maritime environment. 

This is why I am proud to share that the Naval War College has gained the support of the Naval War College Foundation in aligning $91,000 in grant money for faculty and student research on questions pertaining to Maritime Statecraft.

We must continue to encourage intellectual curiosity, foster open dialogue, and challenge conventional wisdom.

Now, more than ever, our maritime services and our Nation require officers who will think strategically about how to lead naval forces in an increasingly contested maritime domain and amidst intense economic, technological, and military competition.

And we need to create institutional opportunities for naval strategists to contribute directly to the work of our leaders.

One opportunity includes the establishment of the Naval Strategic Studies Group, which I announced this past year, modeled after the renowned Cold War-era Chief of Naval Operations Strategic Studies group.

This new Naval Strategic Studies Group will have a mission which serves two purposes: train future flag and general officers in strategic leadership and conduct new research on pressing strategic challenges of importance to our most senior decision-makers.

The first cohort will include both uniformed and civilian members from our Navy and Marine Corps and will further our work on Maritime Statecraft.

They will anticipate future threats, identify emerging opportunities, and develop long-term strategies to ensure our Navy remains a globally dominant force. 

The problems the NSSG will examine are not solvable with a new whiz-bang piece of kit.

Instead, they are conceptual in nature—and expansive.

How can the Navy and Marine Corps most effectively support our allies in standing up to Beijing’s coercive maritime insurgency in the South China Sea?

As AI-enabled sensors proliferate, how can naval forces continue to hide, deceive, and maneuver at sea?

This level of thinking requires strategic foresight that surpasses the traditional confines of operational planning. 

It demands a dedicated space for scholars, strategists, and policymakers to engage in rigorous debate and critical analysis, free from the immediate pressures of operational demands.

The Naval Strategic Studies Group is that space, and a generational reinvestment in creating future Navy and Marine Corps strategic leaders.

The future of the Navy is now. We must continue pushing the boundaries of strategic thinking, just has the Naval War College has for over 140 years.

Strategy—at its core—is the art of marshalling finite resources to achieve prioritized objectives under conditions of competition and uncertainty.

It is a concept often invoked and too little understood.

Without a serious rival, the purpose and urgency of strategy can fade, leaving leaders with dulled instincts for effective decision-making—which can have grave consequences when a new adversary emerges.

Today’s era of renewed strategic competition demands a renaissance in America’s maritime power and maritime strategy. The Naval War College must lead it once again.

The Naval War College is a national treasure. For 140 years, this beacon of learning is where the sharpest minds in maritime strategy have honed their craft.

This institution continues to serve as the strategic heart of our maritime services—where theory and practice converge to ensure our maritime superiority. 

Extraordinary thought leadership in Newport made the nation a global power at the dawn of the 20th Century. 

Luce, Mahan, Sims—icons of this institution—changed the world with revolutionary works on sea power.

They recognized then, as now, that for the United States, maritime strategy is grand strategy.

There is no institution better suited to build the intellectual foundation of Maritime Statecraft. It is in your DNA.

I again emphasize that no great naval power has long endured without also being a maritime power. 

For the last forty years we have sought to defy that maxim—completely outsourcing our commercial shipping and shipbuilding to other countries. 

Is that still tenable today? When 99.6% of our seaborne commerce travels on foreign flagged ships what are the risks to our economy in times of crisis?

All of you in the audience today have a tremendous opportunity to lead the way on groundbreaking research we need to guide our actions and policies.

You are writing the future of our maritime strategy.

It has been the honor of my life to serve as your 78th Secretary of the Navy.

I close my remarks today tremendously grateful for the opportunity to lead the nearly one million Sailors, Marines, and Department of the Navy civilians who proudly serve the greatest nation on earth.

Please know that my wife Betty and I will always carry you in our hearts and prayers till our dying days.

May God bless you, and may God bless the United States of America.