Defense News in Brief: Corry Station Instructors Reflect on COVID-19, Then and Now

Source: United States Navy

The Navy Region Southwest All Hands Message, Corona Virus (COVID-19) Update: March 4, 2022 stated, “While COVID-19 is still a significant concern… leadership has implemented some new instructions based on the Safer Federal Workforce Task Force and CDC locality information.”
 
In March 2022, indoor mask wearing is not required for Department of Defense personnel or visitors. Additionally, the medical screening program is not required for facilities onboard NAS Pensacola, including IWTC Corry Station. This is a significant step toward “post pandemic” normalcy for staff members and students who experienced extreme restrictions and operational challenges during the pandemic.
 
“I am glad to have the mask restrictions lifted” said U.S. Navy Senior Chief Cryptologic Technician (Collection) Raymond Donato, an IWTC Corry Station Instructor. “It is difficult to project your voice to a classroom while wearing a mask.”
 
In March 2020, northwest military bases tightened COVID-19 mitigation protocols by implementing Health Protection Condition Charlie (HPCON C), which is the fourth most stringent level on the five-level Department of Defense protocol for handling disease outbreaks.
 
During HPCON Charlie, most regional bases were placed in an “official business only” posture that only allowed access to base for essential activities, such as medical care and mission essential operations. In addition to limited base access, commands were instructed to use teleworking to the highest extent possible.
 
All information warfare training courses offered onboard Corry Station were considered essential, and training operations continued.  “Even before COVID, we were undermanned,” said U.S. Coast Guard Information Specialist 1st Class Zachary Testa. “During COVID, we had additional restrictions as well as an increase in the number of students and course convenes.”
 
For the nearly 2,500 students residing onboard Corry Station, HPCON Charlie meant they were not permitted to enter the majority of private businesses for any reason. Furthermore, base resources, such as dining facilities, recreational activities, and morale events were limited due to social distancing protocols.
 
“Students’ mental health and overall well-being were at an all-time low during the base lockdown,” said U.S. Navy Information Systems Technician 1st Class Savannah Tynes, an instructor at IWTC Corry Station. “Unfortunately, that comes with restrictions that needed to be followed to ensure the health and safety of the staff members, their families, and our students.” 
 
 
The command’s responsibility to prioritize the health and safety of Sailors onboard Corry Station constituted additional duties for staff members and instructors. Some of those tasks included ensuring that staff and students were medically screened upon entrance to base facilities, daily extensive cleaning of classrooms, and enforcing social distance guidelines base-wide.
 
“The first positive case we had in the schoolhouse, we had to clean the classroom thoroughly to prevent the spread of infection,” explained Donato. “We wore medical suits, cleaned with bleach and blocked off the space for three days.”
 
A reduction of mitigations for COVID-19 has allowed IWTC Corry Station staff members to reflect on the pandemic protocols, and many agree that they were challenged, both personally and professionally.
 
“I had a Sailor re-enlisting for $90K and the day before his reenlistment, he tested positive for COVID-19.  I worked with the chain of command and executed the reenlistment via FaceTime and digital signature,” said Chief Navy Career Counselor David Haeffner. “It forced me to think outside the box, still completing the occupational requirements, only from a different angle.”
 
“I knew this command was going to be challenging but COVID really put a twist on everyone in the Navy, not only Corry Station,” said Tynes. “As a command I think we handled restrictions and precautions effectively and in doing so we were able to still get Sailors to the Fleet.”
 
While command staff and students hope to see IWTC Corry Station return to normal operation for good, all Department of Defense installations are subject to increased protocols should the COVID-19 community levels rise. Additional information on the Center for Disease Control and Prevention community levels can be found at: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/your-health/covid-by-county.html.
 
IWTC Corry Station is a part of the Center for Information Warfare Training (CIWT). With four schoolhouse commands, a detachment, and training sites throughout the United States and Japan, CIWT trains over 22,000 students every year, delivering trained information warfare professionals to the Navy and joint services. CIWT also offers more than 200 courses for cryptologic technicians, intelligence specialists, information systems technicians, electronics technicians, and officers in the information warfare community.
 

Defense News in Brief: Judge Advocates Support Composite Training Unit Exercise

Source: United States Navy

The number of judge advocates involved is partly explained by the complexity of the exercise and the new ground being broken. This was the first time that an ARGMEU participated in training under NATO Command and Control (C2). They rehearsed Transfer of Authority (TOA) of C2 between a U.S. Navy numbered fleet and Naval Striking and Support Forces NATO (STRIKFORNATO), as well as using NATO reporting procedures, messaging formats, and chat capabilities. This training was developed by Carrier Strike Group Four (CSG 4) with input from Combined Joint Operations from the Sea – Centre of Excellence (CJOS COE) and prepared the ARGMEU staff to work within the NATO Alliance.

“This recent demonstration of C2 under NATO authority by an ARGMEU is vital to our continued efforts ensuring that the navies of NATO can work as one team, to defend our shared interests and deter potential threats to international maritime order in the North Atlantic,” said Commodore Tom Guy, Royal Navy, deputy director CJOS COE. “This NATO vignette enables us to exercise Allied interoperability and integration with deploying Strike Groups.”

The NATO vignette, designed by CSG 4 with input from CJOS COE, is the period of time a CSG trains to operate under NATO C2. In the past year, two Carrier Strike Groups (CSG) completed the training, which prepared the Harry S. Truman CSG (HSTCSG) to serve under STRIKFORNATO C2 in the Mediterranean during their recent participation in Neptune Strike activity across Europe.

COMPTUEX is the culmination of a series of exercises designed to integrate the ARGMEU as a cohesive, multi-mission fighting force ready to carry out sustained combat operations from the sea. Leading up to COMPTUEX, the Kearsarge ARG and 22nd MEU participated in an amphibious squadron/MEU integration exercise and Amphibious Ready Group Marine Expeditionary Unit Exercise, led by CSG 4 and Expeditionary Operations Training Group, II Marine Expeditionary Force.

“COMPTUEX was a major milestone and mission accomplishment for the Kearsarge ARGMEU team,” said Capt. David Guluzian, commander of the Kearsarge ARG and Amphibious Squadron Six (CPR-6). “Opportunities to fortify Navy-Marine Corps integration, Coast Guard integration, and NATO command implementation across ARG ships, MEU teams, and embarked staff were prevalent and proved to be successful.”

During COMPTUEX, the Kearsarge ARGMEU units were trained, mentored, and assessed across every core warfare area through a variety of simulated and live events including air warfare, strait transits, boarding operations, amphibious operations, live-fire events, responses to surface, subsurface, and land-based contacts and electronic attacks, and ship-to-shore evolutions. The ARGMEU was tested on its ability to manage the integration of air, land, and sea combat capabilities across the three amphibious ships, USS Kearsarge (LHD 3), USS Arlington (LPD 24), and USS Gunston Hall (LSD 44), and tested their response to a variety of potential threats and real-world factors such as weather and equipment casualties.

Additionally, the exercise was the first to integrate Commander, Expeditionary Strike Group Two (ESG 2), and staff, who embarked on USS Kearsarge in the final phase of the exercise. ESG 2 afloat was joined by Carrier Strike Group Two, which participated as a virtual strike group from shore.

“The Kearsarge ARG and the 22nd MEU successfully completed the final exercise of our pre-deployment training plan, COMPTUEX,” said Marine Corps Col. Paul Merida, commanding officer of the 22nd MEU. “Throughout the exercise, we planned and executed various types of operations in line with our mission essential tasks and our role as the nation’s primary expeditionary crisis response force. The Marines and Sailors of this combined naval force stand ready to go and do as directed.”

Participation of U.S. Coast Guard cutter USCGC Forward (WMEC 911) also marked the first time a cutter participated in an ARGMEU exercise, providing the ARGMEU valuable interoperability experience as naval and USCG forces operate together in forward theaters.

The Kearsarge ARG consists of the Wasp-class amphibious assault ship USS Kearsarge, amphibious transport dock ship USS Arlington, and dock landing ship USS Gunston Hall. Embarked commands include Commander, Amphibious Squadron (PHIBRON) Six, Fleet Surgical Team Two, Tactical Air Control Squadron 22, Helicopter Sea Combat Squadron 23, Assault Craft Unit Two, Assault Craft Unit Four, Naval Beach Group Two, Beach Master Unit Two, and the 22nd MEU. The 22nd MEU consists of the Command Element; the Aviation Combat Element, Marine Medium Tiltrotor Squadron 263 (Reinforced); the Ground Combat Element, Battalion Landing Team Two/Six (Reinforced); and the Logistics Combat Element, Combat Logistics Battalion 26. Also taking part in COMPTUEX was the Arleigh Burke-class guided-missile destroyer USS Forrest Sherman (DDG 98) and the U.S. Coast Guard cutter USCGC Forward.

This article is adapted from the official public affairs release on the exercise by U.S. 2nd Fleet (C2F), which is available here.

Defense News in Brief: Looking for Lessons Learned? The Name Has Changed, but the Focus Remains the Same

Source: United States Navy

Although the name has changed, Sailors, Marines and civilian employees can still expect the same relevant and timely safety lessons created to help them avoid repeating the close calls and mishaps of others through impactful and sometimes humorous articles.

“The purpose of the Safety Awareness Dispatch remains the same,” said Chris Rew, Naval Safety Command Safety Awareness program manager. “To make people stop and think before they try something that may result in an injury or potentially a loss of life. We do this through telling stories that people will remember.”

After much brainstorming, discussion and consideration, the Safety Awareness team concluded the word “dispatch” was the best choice for a number of reasons, including its strong link to naval heritage.

“In naval history, dispatch boats were tasked as early as the American Revolution to carry military dispatches from ship to ship or ship to shore when other means of transmitting messages were not possible or safe – or as quick,” Rew said.

In addition to its military connection, Rew said the word has several other definitions that fit the product as well, including being concise and to the point, an official report on state or military affairs and sending something to a destination for a purpose. 

“The name ‘Safety Awareness Dispatch’ more accurately defines the product while still providing the same invaluable information with the ultimate goal of enabling warfighting readiness by keeping our number one resource safe: our Sailors, Marines and civilians,” said Kirk Horton, Naval Safety Command Data Analytics and Safety Promotions director.

These articles, which date back to 2018, cover a wide range of safety topics – both on and off duty. Some editions are publicly released and available on the command’s website at https://navalsafetycommand.navy.mil/Safety-Promotions/Safety-Awareness/, and the full library is available on the command’s common access card-enabled site at https://intelshare.intelink.gov/sites/nsc/ (click on the “Safety Awareness Products” icon).

Rew said his team is always looking for new topics and stories about safety champions and firsthand accounts of mishaps averted to use in future Safety Awareness Dispatches. People interested in submitting their stories can email NAVSAFECEN_CODE522_LESSONS_LEARNED@navy.mil.

Security News: ESI Energy LLC, Wholly Owned Subsidiary of Nextera Energy Resources LLC, is Sentenced After Pleading Guilty to Killing and Wounding Eagles in Its Wind Energy Operations, in Violation of the Migratory Bird Treaty Act

Source: United States Department of Justice News

ESI Energy Inc. (ESI) was sentenced today in Cheyenne, Wyoming, for violations of the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA), announced Assistant Attorney General Todd Kim for the Justice Department’s Environment and Natural Resources Division and U.S. Attorney L. Robert Murray for the District of Wyoming.

ESI is a wholly owned subsidiary of NextEra Energy Resources LLC, which in turn is a wholly owned subsidiary of NextEra Energy Inc. ESI owns other companies, many of which operate wind energy generation facilities throughout the United States, including in Wyoming, New Mexico, Arizona, California, Colorado, Illinois, North Dakota and Michigan, as well as other states.

ESI pled guilty to three counts of violating the MBTA, each based on the documented deaths of golden eagles due to blunt force trauma from being struck by a wind turbine blade at a particular facility in Wyoming or New Mexico, where ESI had not applied for the necessary permits. ESI further acknowledged that at least 150 bald and golden eagles have died in total since 2012, across 50 of its 154 wind energy facilities. 136 of those deaths have been affirmatively determined to be attributable to the eagle being struck by a wind turbine blade.

The court sentenced ESI, pursuant to a plea agreement, to a fine of $1,861,600, restitution in the amount of $6,210,991, and a five-year period of probation during which it must follow an Eagle Management Plan (EMP). The EMP requires implementation of up to $27 million (during the period of probation; more thereafter if a written extension is signed) of measures intended to minimize additional eagle deaths and injuries, and payment of compensatory mitigation for future eagle deaths and injuries of $29,623 per bald or golden eagle.  ESI also must over the next 36 months apply for permits for any unavoidable take of eagles at each of 50 of its facilities where take is documented or, in the case of four facilities not yet operational, predicted.

“The Justice Department will enforce the nation’s wildlife laws to promote Congress’s purposes, including ensuring sustainable populations of bald and golden eagles, and to promote fair competition for companies that comply,” said Assistant Attorney General Todd Kim of the Justice Department’s Environment and Natural Resources Division. “For more than a decade, ESI has violated those laws, taking eagles without obtaining or even seeking the necessary permit. We are pleased to see ESI now commit to seeking such permits and ultimately ceasing such violations.” 

“Wyoming is graced with abundant natural resources – including both eagles and strong winds,” said U.S. Attorney L. Robert Murray for the District of Wyoming. “The sentencing today shows our commitment to both maintaining and making sustainable use of our resources. It also ensures a level playing field for business in Wyoming and ensures those receiving federal tax credits are complying with federal law.”

“The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) has a long history of working closely with the wind power industry to identify best practices in avoiding and minimizing the impacts of land-based wind energy facilities on wildlife, including eagles,” said Edward Grace, Assistant Director of the USFWS’ Office of Law Enforcement. “This agreement holds ESI and its affiliates accountable for years of unwillingness to work cooperatively with the Service and their blatant disregard of wildlife laws, and finally marks a path forward for the benefit of eagles and other wildlife resources entrusted to the Service’s stewardship.”         

“This prosecution and the restitution it secures will protect the ecologically vital and majestic natural resources of our bald eagle and golden eagle populations,” said U.S. Attorney Phillip A. Talbert for the Eastern District of California. “California has been awarded more than $4.6 million in restitution under this plea agreement for the deaths of at least 92 eagles within the state caused by the defendant and affiliated companies.”

The MBTA prohibits the “taking” of migratory birds, including bald and golden eagles, without a permit from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service of the Department of the Interior. “Take” is defined by regulation to mean “to pursue, hunt, shoot, wound, kill, trap, capture or collect” or to attempt to do so.

Bald and golden eagles are also protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (the Eagle Act) which, like the MBTA, prohibits killing and wounding eagles without a permit from USFWS. USFWS is authorized to issue such eagle take permits (ETPs) only where: (1) the predicted take is compatible with the preservation of bald and golden eagles; (2) it is necessary to protect an interest in a particular locality; (3) the take is associated with, but not the purpose of, the activity; and (4) the take could not practicably be avoided. Permit applicants are required to avoid and minimize take to the maximum extent practicable, and to pay compensatory mitigation for unavoidable takes.

According to documents filed in court, it is the government’s position that ESI’s conduct violated both the Eagle Act and the MBTA, but the government accepted the company’s guilty plea to only MBTA counts due in large part to ESI’s agreement to apply for permits at 50 facilities and its prior efforts to minimize and mitigate for eagle fatalities.

ESI’s and its affiliated companies’ actions in Wyoming and New Mexico were taken under an admitted nationwide posture and alleged corporate policy of not applying for ETPs.

According to the information filed in this case:

  • ESI and its affiliates deliberately elected not to apply for or obtain any ETP intended to ensure the preservation of bald and golden eagles, and instead chose to construct and operate facilities it knew would take eagles, and in fact took eagles, without any permits authorizing that take.
  • Because ESI did not seek any ETPs, it avoided any immediate federal obligation to avoid and minimize eagle take to the maximum degree practicable and to pay for compensatory mitigation for the eagle deaths.
  • Because some other wind energy companies (1) altered proposed operations as required to avoid and minimize take levels to the maximum degree practicable, (2) applied for ETPs, (3) obtained ETPs that in some cases were impacted by take levels caused by ESI’s unpermitted facilities, and/or (4) paid mitigation for eagle takings, ESI, by not doing these things, gained a competitive advantage relative to those wind energy companies.
  • ESI and its affiliates began commercial operations at new facilities on a schedule intended to meet, among other things, power purchase agreement commitments and qualifying deadlines for particular tax credit rates for renewable energy, and with production amounts not impacted by avoidance and minimization measures that might have been required under an eagle take permit. ESI and its affiliates received hundreds of millions of dollars in federal tax credits for generating electricity from wind power at facilities that it operated, knowing that multiple eagles would be killed and wounded without legal authorization, and without, in most instances, paying restitution or compensatory mitigation.

According to documents filed in court, between 2018 and 2019, ESI authorized subsidiary Cedar Springs Transmission LLC (CST) to develop a multi-facility commercial wind power project in Converse County, Wyoming, consisting of the Cedar Springs I, II and III wind power facilities (collectively, the project).

On March 28, 2019, USFWS informed the defendant, through a letter to its agents, that Cedar Springs I and II, based on CST’s consultant’s calculations, could result in the collision mortality of 44 golden eagles and 23 bald eagles over the first five years of operations, and recommended that, because of the unusually high number of occupied golden eagle nests, the proposed wind facilities not be built. USFWS further stated that, if the facilities were built, the company should apply for an ETP under the Eagle Act as soon as possible. The defendant continued the development of the Cedar Springs facilities.

On July 17, 2019, representatives of CST met with USFWS representatives. During that meeting, USFWS recommended that, consistent with the recommendation made by USFWS in February, the wind project not be constructed due to the risk of avian fatalities. USFWS also recommended that, if the wind project was built, the project should implement seasonal curtailment during daylight hours. The defendant did not implement the recommended curtailment.

Between Sept. 10 and Sept. 23, 2019, USFWS sent additional letters to the defendant’s agents, each noting that the defendant’s parent company had documented that the project was anticipated to kill eagles and recommending that the facilities apply for an ETP. USFWS reiterated for the third time its recommendation that a wind project should not be constructed in the proposed area for the Cedar Springs project.

On or about Sept 28, 2020, the defendant’s affiliates began some turbine operations at Cedar Springs II. Between approximately Nov 29, 2020, and Dec 1, 2020, two golden eagle carcasses were found near wind turbines at Cedar Springs II (after which it was sold).

On or about Dec. 6, 2020, the defendant authorized the commercial operation of Cedar Springs I to commence. Between April 2021 and January 2022, seven golden eagle carcasses were found near wind turbines at Cedar Springs I.

On or about Dec. 15, 2020, the defendant authorized the commercial operation of Cedar Springs III to commence. On approximately Jan. 30, 2022, a golden eagle carcass was found near a wind turbine at Cedar Springs III.

Between 2018 and 2019, ESI authorized a subsidiary, Roundhouse Renewable Energy LLC (RRE), to develop a commercial wind power facility in Laramie County, Wyoming.

In a letter dated March 28, 2019, USFWS stated that, based on RRE’s consultant’s calculations, Roundhouse could result in the collision mortality of 19 golden eagles and 4 bald eagles over the first five years of operation, and recommended that RRE apply for an ETP under the Eagle Act. The defendant continued the development of Roundhouse.

In a letter dated Aug. 27, 2019, USFWS provided recommendations on opportunities to avoid and minimize impacts to eagles using the available data. USFWS again stated that the facility was predicted to take eagles even if all USFWS recommendations were implemented, however, and recommended that an ETP be sought.

On June 12, 2020, the defendant authorized the commercial operation of Roundhouse to commence. Between approximately Sept. 17, 2020, and April 17, 2021, four golden eagle carcasses were found near wind turbines at Roundhouse.

In 2003, ESI authorized a subsidiary, FPL Energy New Mexico Wind LLC (NMW), to begin operations at a commercial wind power facility in De Baca and Quay Counties, New Mexico. On or about Dec. 29, 2020, two golden eagle carcasses were found near a wind turbine at NMW.

No ETP was sought by or issued to ESI in connection with the operations or repowering of any of the above wind power facilities.

This case was investigated by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Office of Law Enforcement. The prosecutions were handled by the Environmental Crimes Section of the Justice Department’s Environment and Natural Resources Division with assistance from the U.S. Attorneys’ Offices for the Eastern District of California, the District of Wyoming and the Northern District of California.

Defense News in Brief: SECNAV Delivers Remarks at Sea Air Space 2022

Source: United States Navy

Good Afternoon Navy League! It is a great honor to be here with you today!

Thank you for putting together this great conference, and for all of your advocacy on behalf of our Navy and Marine Corps.

My wife Betty and I have had the pleasure of being life-long members of the Navy League for many years now, and we have proudly helped with many a gathering of Navy Leaguers here in DC.

And of course, I still remember my first Navy League gathering in Palma de Mallorca, Spain, during my first deployment on the USS Kelsh!

Through your many programs, you indeed make a huge difference in the lives of our Sailors and Marines.

And now, it’s my turn to make a difference again, as your Secretary of the Navy!

Next month I will be on Capitol Hill, fighting again to make sure our warriors have what they need to protect our nation, long into the future.

Chairman Reed was right when he said “budget should be driven by strategy, not strategy driven by the budget.”

That’s why we’ve put forward a clear strategy to deliver the “lethal resilient, sustainable, survivable, agile, and responsive force” called for in the 2022 National Defense Strategy.

Our strategy is rooted on three guiding principles:

First, to maintain and strengthen our maritime dominance so that we can deter potential adversaries, and fight and win if necessary.

Second, to empower our Sailors and Marines by fostering a culture of warfighting excellence, founded on treating each other with dignity and respect.

And third, to strengthen our strategic partnerships, across the Joint Force, with industry, and with our international partners around the globe.

That is the strategy for the Department of the Navy.

It is clear, direct, and concise!

Now let me provide some additional detail on those three guiding principles.

In order to maintain and strengthen maritime dominance, we have to be serious about fielding and maintaining the right capabilities to win tomorrow’s wars.

The National Defense Strategy’s vision for integrated deterrence requires us to campaign forward – from the South China Sea, to the Arctic, to the Mediterranean, and the Gulf.

Right now we are doing just that, with 74 ships deployed around the globe, including four carriers and two amphibious assault ships.

Every one of these ships operates as part of a fully networked, agile, and survivable fleet, capable of delivering coordinated long range fires and unmatched lethality from many points at once.

That’s the power of Distributed Maritime Operations today and it’s a noted difference from 20 years ago.

It enables our Joint Force to execute the National Defense Strategy’s mandate to “complicate the military preparations of our competitors and enhance our own warfighting capabilities.”  

I strongly support Admiral Gilday’s vision for DMO, and all aspects of the Navy’s Navigation Plan.

That’s why our budget invests in more of the nimble and survivable platforms that enable our forward presence, capacity, and lethality.

We are holding the line on DDG51 and VIRGINIA, with a budget that funds two Flight III Destroyers and two attack submarines per year.

We will launch our second century of carrier aviation with the deployment of USS GERALD R. FORD, along with further purchases of the F-35 and the continued development of the MQ-25.

And we will continue progress on future programs like COLUMBIA, the backbone of tomorrow’s nuclear deterrent, and CONSTELLATION, which will provide greater presence and lethality on the surface.

We will also invest in our amphibious fleet, fully funding an additional LHA, and an additional LPD, in the coming year.

These warships are vital for the organic mobility and persistence of our Marine Corps, always in high demand as a “Swiss Army Knife” to meet the needs of the Joint Force.

The modern Amphibious Ready Group and Marine Expeditionary Unit are the 9-1-1 call for Combatant Commanders in the most dynamic and volatile situations, from humanitarian disasters to combat.

As General Berger put it in his initial planning guidance, “no matter what the crisis, our civilian leaders should always have one shared thought – Send in the Marines!”

I am deeply grateful to the Commandant for his committed leadership on Force Design 2030, and I strongly support his plan. Let me perfectly clear about that.

Force Design 2030 will form the expeditionary core of our entire Joint Force long into the future – so we must fund it!

Right now there are over 30,000 forward deployed Marines, operating at sea and in over 50 countries around the world.

We must ensure they are armed, mobile, and ready to “fight and win in any clime and place.”

That’s why we’re investing in platforms the CH53 Kilo – the most powerful helicopter in the Joint Force.  

The capacity and lift of this aircraft is transforming the organic mobility of units like the new Marine Littoral Regiment in the Indo Pacific.

We will improve our persistence and lethality in the contested zone through Expeditionary Advanced Basing Operations.

I saw this concept in action in North Carolina, as Marines simulated the seizure of a contested airfield, then landed and refueled a squadron of F35s from a C-130J, all in a matter of minutes.

Linking all of these new warfighting capabilities will be a new Naval Operational Architecture we are developing through Project Overmatch.

We are deadly serious about planning for the future and meeting the challenges we can anticipate – and those we cannot.

Anyone who tells you they know the exact number of every platform that will meet the exact needs of the 2030s and 2040s must be gifted with second sight.

I don’t have that. But what I do have is an abiding respect for the American taxpayer of today and tomorrow.

And the greatest way I can demonstrate that is to be clear and transparent on our anticipated needs – and the degree of uncertainty in those figures.

Because while we can estimate the kinds of adversaries and challenges we’ll face five, ten and twenty years down the road, we cannot be certain.

So we must build and prepare in the most powerful and agile force we can, in the most efficient way possible, while preserving options for future leaders to adjust to a changing security environment. And we haven’t always done that in the past.

I don’t want tomorrow’s Secretary of the Navy to have to choose between building the right capabilities, or maintaining high cost legacy platforms that don’t meet our needs.

I have an abiding respect for the Constitutional role of Congress to “provide and maintain a Navy.” In the end, the power of the purse resides on Capitol Hill.

But as we enter this budget season, I will ask Congress to provide the tools we need to execute the Navigation Plan and Force Design 2030, without burdening us with unnecessary legacy platforms that cost a lot to maintain and operate and perhaps don’t meet current threats.

Every taxpayer dollar must be maximized to ensure the right mix of capacity, capability, modernization, and readiness for our frontline warriors.  

Because our greatest asset will always be the Sailors and Marines who wear our uniform, and the families who serve at their side.

We owe it to them today, and tomorrow, to provide them with the best opportunity to succeed.

That’s why my second guiding principle is empowering our people, by fostering a culture of warfighting excellence.

Together, we must continue to creatively recruit, retain, equip, and promote the best of all of America.

We need a diverse force today, so every child in America can see themselves wearing the uniform tomorrow. This is a national security imperative.

In practice this means we have to take talent management to a higher level, matching the diverse talents of individuals to the needs of the Joint Force. 

It means showing leadership, through words and example, to eliminate sexual harassment and assault from every part of our ranks.

And it means taking a deliberate approach to building a leadership cadre that truly represents our nation. 

As Secretary I am determined to do everything I can to enable the success of our Sailors and Marines, and to care for their families.

I just came back from Europe, where I had the opportunity to visit with many of those Sailors and Marines aboard USS HARRY S. TRUMAN.

I was inspired with their morale, skill, and pride as they conducted NATO allied operations alongside the aircraft carriers of the French and Italian Navies.

That pride stands in sharp contrast to what we are observing in the Russian military today.

In the face of spirited resistance from the Ukrainian people, aided by our weapons and support, Vladimir Putin’s horrific invasion is grinding to a stalemate.

More ominously for the Putin regime, the bubble of disinformation which encircled the Russian people is bursting.

The Russian economy is crumbling back to the standards of the 1980s.

And Russian troops are turning on their own leadership.

Democracy will always prove stronger than dictatorship, because our people know what they are fighting for.

Every Sailor and Marine in our force is motivated in some way by the ideals of our Nation, and the freedom for which our flag stands.

For me, Naval service was a chance to give back to the Nation that welcomed me and my family as refugees from the authoritarian regime of Fidel Castro. Another communist leader.

Through decades of service in uniform, private industry, and government, I’ve strived to live up to my oath to uphold and defend the Constitution.

Most of the people in this room have at some point raised their right hand and taken that same oath.

It’s one of the things that sets our Nation apart – we don’t swear an oath to a person, party, or service.

We pledge ourselves to an enduring document, rooted in a common commitment to “secure the blessings of liberty.”

It’s a document that guarantees so many of the rights we see being trampled in Moscow and Beijing today, from the freedom of speech to the due process of law.

And it is those very freedoms that fuel the greatest strengths of our Nation.

Our economy is protected by laws and standards, so our industrial partners have the confidence and motivation to innovate and transform the future.

Our government is kept accountable by a free press and the freedom of speech, so the American people can trust us with their tax dollars.

And our allies and partners are motivated to stand with us in defense of the international rules-based order because they know of our commitment to freedom, liberty, and justice for all.

From industry, to government, to our global alliances, the partnerships we have built on a foundation of common values represent our greatest advantages against authoritarian regimes.

That’s why my third guiding principle is strengthening our strategic partnerships.

I spent 17 years as a business owner attending this very conference serving the Armed Forces, so I understand how much we rely upon industrial partnerships to protect our nation.

I know the importance of consistent and predictable funding, so those of you in our industrial base can invest in your critical infrastructure, and maintain a workforce with the critical skills that you need and sometimes is hard to find.

At the Department of the Navy, we are committed to engaging with industry, understanding your challenges, and responding to your needs.

But we also need our partners to manage costs, fight requirements creep, and deliver platforms on-time and on-budget.

We owe it to the American taxpayer to ensure that each dollar reaches the warfighter in the most efficient and effective way possible.

And we owe it to those warfighters – and their families, to ensure they are equipped with the most effective platforms and equipment possible.

Because I have seen what our people can do with the right tools for the job.

The aircraft, the ships, the weapons, and the supplies you provide are transforming our force, and strengthening our alliances in ways we hardly could have imagined a decade ago. 

When I visited Marine Corps Air Station Iwakuni, I saw aviators and crews working side-by-side with our allies, using the F-35B to strengthen our allied deterrence in the Indo-Pacific.

They can even land on a Japanese ship, the converted Destroyer IZUMO.

And last year, Marine Fighter Attack Squadron 211 deployed aboard HMS QUEEN ELIZABETH, the new flagship of the Royal Navy.

For seven months, our Naval Aviators operated ten F35Bs alongside eight others flown by the Royal Air Force.

Together they formed the largest fifth generation air wing on earth, the centerpiece of a multinational strike group that traversed the globe.

Along the way they operated alongside allies and partners including Australia, France, Israel, Italy, New Zealand, Japan, Malaysia, Singapore, and many others.

That a level of allied unity and strength China nor Russia cannot ever hope to achieve.

Because unlike Moscow and Beijing, we don’t treat allies like client states or satellites. We respect them as partners, leaders, and friends.

We have direct conversations, and don’t agree on everything.

But we all agree on the importance of working together to defend the rules-based international order that protects us all.

Each nation has its own capabilities and skills that can act as a force multiplier to protect our mutual interests and deter the aggression of others.

And I am determined to strengthen these ties even further, leveraging the unique strengths and experiences of every nation.

The National Defense Strategy calls on our force to “incorporate ally and partner perspectives, competencies, and advantages at every stage of defense planning.”

And I take that mandate seriously. Our forces are learning together, training together, and operating together, from the Indo Pacific to the Arctic Circle.

I saw this in the preparations for Exercise COLD RESPONSE in Norway, which brought together 30,000 troops, 220 aircraft, and 50 vessels from 27 countries.

This exercise provided a critical opportunity for our forces to operate near the harsh Arctic environment on NATO’s northern flank.

This exercise also brought home a solemn reminder of the dangers our men and women in uniform face every day, as four proud United States Marines lost their lives when their Osprey crashed in extreme weather.

I know I speak for everyone here when I extend my deepest condolences to the families of those fallen warriors and those that died at Abbey Gate.

They died as they lived – serving, preparing, and operating alongside our allies in the cause of freedom.

Remember those warriors as you return from this conference.

Let their example motivate you in our shared mission of National Defense.

Bring a sense of urgency to all that you do to equip, train, recruit, lead, and support the Sailors and Marines who keep watch for us all.

Because they are counting on us. And as a lifetime Navy League member I know that we will come through.

To quote a former Assistant Secretary of the Navy named Franklin Roosevelt, “Together, we simply cannot fail.”

So thank you all for your support for our Sailors and Marines. And to all who wear the uniform today, thank you, and your families, for your service.

May God bless you all. Thank you.