Security News: Convicted Felon Indicted For Possessing A Firearm And Ammunition

Source: United States Department of Justice News

Tampa, Florida –United States Attorney Roger B. Handberg announces the return of an indictment charging Cedric Durham, Jr. (21, Tampa) with possessing a firearm and ammunition as a convicted felon. If convicted, he faces a maximum penalty of 10 years in federal prison. The indictment also notifies Durham that the United States intends to forfeit the firearm and ammunition traceable to the offense. Durham was arrested on June 13, 2022, in Tampa. He made his initial appearance before United States Magistrate Judge Thomas Wilson the following day and was ordered detained pending trial.

According to the indictment, on March 6, 2022, Durham was in possession of a firearm and ammunition. At the time of the incident, Durham had a previous felony conviction for carrying a concealed firearm. As a previously convicted felon, Durham is prohibited from possessing a firearm or ammunition under federal law.

An indictment is merely a formal charge that a defendant has committed one or more violations of federal criminal law, and every defendant is presumed innocent unless, and until, proven guilty. 

This case was investigated by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and the Tampa Police Department. It will be prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorneys Maria Guzman and David Chee. The forfeiture will be handled by Assistant United States Attorney James Muench.

This case is being prosecuted as part of the joint federal, state, and local Project Safe Neighborhoods (PSN) Program, the centerpiece of the Department of Justice’s violent crime reduction efforts.  PSN is an evidence-based program proven to be effective at reducing violent crime.  Through PSN, a broad spectrum of stakeholders work together to identify the most pressing violent crime problems in the community and develop comprehensive solutions to address them.  As part of this strategy, PSN focuses enforcement efforts on the most violent offenders and partners with locally based prevention and reentry programs for lasting reductions in crime.

Defense News: African Lion 22 begins, runs June 6-30 in Morocco, Tunisia, Senegal and Ghana

Source: United States Navy

Led by the U.S. Army Southern European Task Force, Africa, African Lion 22 will execute in four countries: Morocco, Ghana, Senegal and Tunisia.

Militaries from Brazil, Chad, France, Italy, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom will join U.S. and host nation troops. U.S. participants come from all service components, including the Reserves and National Guard.

African Lion 22 features a joint task force command post exercise, a combined arms live fire exercise, a maritime exercise, an air exercise including bomber aircraft, a joint forcible entry with paratroopers into a field training exercise, a chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear response exercise, and a humanitarian civic assistance program event.

The exercise bolsters interoperability among partner nations and supports U.S. military strategic readiness to respond to crises and contingencies in Africa and around the world.

The exercise involved months of collaboration between all participating countries to ensure proper COVID-19 mitigation. Southern European Task Force, Africa, will establish the exercise’s combined joint task force headquarters, integrating AFRICOM components and international partners to solve a complex, trans-regional crisis.

U.S. participants come from all service components, including the Reserves and National Guard. This effort involves strengthening our shared defense capabilities to counter transnational threats and violent extremist organizations, which is in the common good of the U.S. and African partner nations.

Defense News: SECNAV Delivers Remarks at the University of the South Pacific

Source: United States Navy

Bula! Ni Sa Bula! Good afternoon. Thank you, Professor Ahluwalia, for the kind introduction.

I thank the entire team at the University of the South Pacific for inviting me here to speak today.

The people of Fiji, and all twelve nations that form the extraordinary, intergovernmental partnership that makes this University such a success, are America’s steadfast partners and always will be. I am very proud to be here today with my wife Betty.

With campuses in each nation spread over 33 million square kilometers, an area three times the size of Europe, you are truly the crossroads of the Pacific.

I am grateful – and, more importantly, the American people are grateful – to each individual nation for your contributions to the peace, security, and prosperity of this essential region. That is so interconnected to the entire globe.

And we are committed to standing by you, in the preservation of peace, freedom, and security.

As Secretary of State Anthony Blinken has said, “Our enduring commitment to this region and our collaborations with our allies and partners will help us achieve a free and open, interconnected, prosperous, resilient, and secure region for all and nations and people.”

Our Navy and Marine Corps Team is proud to play an important role in each of those priorities, which form the pillars of President Biden’s Indo-Pacific strategy and our relationship with each of you.

Today I want to focus on resiliency and security, particularly as related to the existential threat of climate change as the President so eloquently stated.

Throughout my years of public service, I have traveled throughout this extraordinary part of the world many times.

The Blue Pacific Continent is indeed extraordinary, beyond measure. I am struck, however, at the scale of the changes over the last two decades.

I am particularly struck and alarmed by just how much the oceans have risen in that time.

I am struck by the many villages forced to retreat to higher ground and the farmland rendered useless by saltwater intrusion.

I am struck by how warming waters have driven valuable fish stocks from your once bountiful waters.

And how ocean – warming and acidification is bleaching and ultimately killing off precious coral reefs.

The continued loss of these natural treasures increasingly threatens the well-being of your ecosystems and your world class status as a tourism destination.

I’m alarmed by cyclones of increasing intensity that regularly strike this region causing much destruction and suffering.

We recognize that the Blue Pacific Continent is on the front lines, face-to-face with the existential threat of climate change.

Just last weekend, Fiji’s Defense Minister proclaimed at the Shangri-La Dialogue: “The single greatest threat to our very existence is climate change.  It threatens our very hopes and dreams of prosperity.”

I couldn’t agree with him more. So let me state unequivocally: we are in this together.

We increasingly recognize our shared priorities, particularly when it comes to climate security.

We have heard the scientific community. We know we are in the critical decade for action if we are to head off the most extreme consequences.

Fortunately, we have momentum and a strong foundation to build upon. 

The U.S. Navy and Marine Corps team has been working on climate and energy security for a very long time. Now, we are accelerating and broadcasting  those efforts.

We have recognized the opportunity to harness the enormous size, scale and reach of the US military into every sector of the American economy to drive sustainable innovation across our society.

The Department of Defense is positioned better than any other U.S. institution to be a leading agent for change.  We have the ability to not only reduce our own carbon footprint but to also play a critical leadership role in helping reduce the United States’ carbon footprint as a whole.

I know how important this is to all of you. To each and everyone of you in this room. To your children and grandchildren.  You are the first to bear the most extreme consequences of climate change, despite your negligible contribution to global warming. 

Doing our part is the right thing to do, the just thing to do. Any drive for economic expansion with little to no regard to limiting emissions does not have your well-being at heart.  

We understand that we can only be successful in tackling this crisis of unprecedented proportions if we do work together in good faith. 

To that end, I am here today to tell you, we are committed to deepening our partnerships with you, the nations of the Blue Pacific Continent.

As you know better than most, climate impacts are already here and so our efforts must begin with relying on your expertise.  We intend to listen and learn.

That spirit of friendship is why I am so happy to be amongst you today to exchange thoughts on how we can work together on our greatest challenges.  

The U.S. understands the key role island nations play as strategic partners.  That is why we are helping a multilateral effort to build a peer-peer island network whose motto is “Led by Islands for Islands”.  I and my fellow senior U.S. government leaders understand that sentiment.  That is why the U.S. has announced $9 million in technical and financial support for the Local 2030 Islands Network, a critical initiative launched by the UN General Assembly two years ago.

I am proud that my Office of Naval Research is partnering with the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Agency (NOAA) and others on this important initiative. Several of your nations have joined: Fiji, the Marshall Islands, Palau and Micronesia. For those nations who are not yet part of the network, I encourage you to join us as soon as possible. We don’t have enough time to wait.

At the Department of the Navy, we view the climate crisis much the same way as “damage control efforts” on a stricken ship.  It is an “All Hands on Deck” moment and universities have many of those talented hands we need “on deck.” And yes I am talking to everyone of you students right now.

That need is why we have worked with academic institutions throughout the Indo-Pacific through our Asia Pacific Technology and Education Partnership program.

Through this program, we have formed partnerships with universities across the Indo-Pacific to create knowledge exchanges fostering mutual technical and educational opportunities.

I am very proud of such an initiative supported by my Office of Naval Research (ONR). ONR is working with the University of Hawaii to empower other Indo-Pacific islands to track and advance progress on local energy and climate efforts to include water and coastal resilience.

Our goal is to advance data science, visualization and decision making for your leaders in areas of clean energy, energy equity, transportation, resilience and greenhouse gas emissions.  

Launched in January, this Data Resilience Community of Practice has engaged with NOAA to collect data for climate change action with a focus on two critical areas: sea level rise and coral reef monitoring. Which all of you know is critically important to your ecosystem.

As one who cares deeply about our institutions of higher education, let me just pause and reiterate how grateful I am to be able to share these opportunities with you here today. The University of the South Pacific has enormous talent and intellectual resources that we can learn from as we pursue these efforts.

Take Dr. Elisabeth Holland, Professor of Oceans and Climate Change and one of this University’s many thought leaders.

She is a Nobel Peace Prize Laureate -think about that –  and eminent climate change researcher and educator.  I am grateful for her global leadership on this issue and I hope she is listening to me from afar.

As a senior official responsible for addressing complex issues related to climate, I am especially grateful for her renowned commitment to translating science into the language of policy makers.

 I’ve initiated a process to integrate climate security into the Navy’s graduate education programs.

If we are to arrest climate change, we need to make sure we are understanding and acting on the enormous expertise of people like Dr. Holland and her team at the Pacific Center for Environment and Sustainable Development.

Indeed, we seek to expand our work with a diverse set of experts residing across the region.  Together we need to raise up and heed the voices of Pacific scholars and researchers on the front lines of climate change.  We can learn much from your rich history of indigenous local and regional knowledge.  

Similarly, we must further leverage the expertise of non-governmental organizations and I know many of you work at NGOs, and the private sector to build innovative and localized climate mitigation strategies. 

For example, the oceans are key to our future and the pioneering ocean-based solutions being developed here to meet the climate challenge are critically important.  The U.S. Navy has studied the oceans since our founding in the 18th century.  Few institutions have more data on and knowledge of the ocean environment. The possibilities for collaboration to protect the oceans and climate are full of promise. Imagine what all you students can do with all that knowledge and information. I am very excited.

Another important and long-standing regional initiative where we are together addressing climate-related challenges is called Pacific Partnership. 

Through our annual Pacific Partnership mission, we have sustained important infrastructure and natural environment resilience while also creating stronger emergency preparedness.

Unfortunately, as we all recognize, the climate crisis is creating extreme weather events necessitating more frequent emergency response to unprecedented destruction and suffering.

That’s why key elements of our Pacific Partnership are training exercises and medical and engineering expert exchanges to empower strong and collaborative regional responses to emergencies. It does take regional solutions – all of these nations working together to find solutions.

While we are always eager to strengthen human capacity and infrastructure resilience through programs like Pacific Partnership, we must still do more.

The U.S. Navy Construction Battalion – better known as the SEABEES – strengthen infrastructure resilience across the region. They have addressed real-time drought issues in the Republic of the Marshall Islands, fixing water distribution maintenance problems and providing residential water purification techniques.

Our SEABEES are also helping partners in the region adapt and build resilience through shoreline and wetlands improvements to handle storm surges aggressively eroding your coastlines as well as building renewable energy micro-grids, best suited for island needs. These microgrids create resiliency should a storm take the central grid offline while also limiting greenhouse gas emissions.

Advanced Technology is a critical component of our work. As large ocean nations with the world’s most expansive exclusive economic zones (EEZs), you best understand how critical it is to monitor and control your waters. We are continuously improving Maritime Domain Awareness capability and capacity so we can help you optimally manage your maritime resources, including the ability to track and respond to illegal fishing and other illicit activity in your territorial waters.

As the climate crisis depletes fish stocks and droughts contribute to greater freshwater water scarcity, it is essential we ensure that others do not unlawfully exploit your sovereign resources. Let me be clear, however: the efforts to date are also not enough.

While the U.S. is committed to helping the nations of the Pacific successfully adapt to the near-term, painful impacts, ultimately winning the fight against this crisis will require more than resilience, it will require meaningful mitigation.

Reducing our greenhouse gas emissions must be a priority.  And I am pleased that we have just released a comprehensive plan to address this challenge. The U.S. Navy and Marine Corps’ Climate Action 2030 is indeed a broad, multi-pronged approach.

This strategy, and the commitment it represents, recognizes that there is not a trade-off between addressing climate security and our core mission of combat readiness and integrated deterrence.

In fact, the opposite is true.

Embracing climate-focused technologies and adopting a climate-informed posture strengthens our capability to stand by our partners and allies.

It strengthens our maritime dominance.

It strengthens our people.

It strengthens our partnerships.

And we are already putting words into action.

The U.S. Marine Corps just announced our first Net Zero Energy installation.

That means the installation produces as much – or even more – energy than it consumes.  In fact, over the last decade the U.S. Department of the Navy has provided over one gigawatt of energy back to the commercial grid from installations across the country.

And although our Marine Corps Logistics Base in Georgia is the first to achieve “net zero” status it is by no means a “one off”.  We have renewable energy at bases all over the world, as well as 18 highly reliable and resilient microgrids.   

And we continue to aggressively transition to renewable energy with a pipeline of projects including a 42 Megawatt installation here in the Pacific at our facilities at Pearl Harbor.

Greater use of renewables means fewer fossil fuels and lower emissions. It is a step forward in the fight against the climate crisis.

But it also makes our bases more resilient in the face of natural disasters and other power disruptions.

It results in crucial cost savings, leaving us more resources to strengthen our fleet and deepen our partnerships.

It allows us to adopt more advanced technology, creating a virtuous cycle of energy efficiency, cost savings, maritime dominance, and climate security.

We can use these same technologies at sea.

For instance, hybrid propulsion systems give our ships greater range between refueling that strengthens our fleet, while also limiting emissions.

Pre-positioned, forward-deployed renewable energy sources dramatically increase the range of unmanned assets that monitor threats at sea. Again, such technologies can replace fossil fuel intensive platforms, limiting our emissions.

Put simply, the technologies built to combat the climate crisis are an asset to the operational capabilities of the U.S. Navy-Marine Corps team.

Yet none of these technologies or ideas mean anything without conscious, vigorous implementation.  

We have a track record of implementing these technologies and we are committed to doing more. And we are committed to sharing these strategies to our Blue Pacific partners and others around the world.

We must ensure this strategy is a success. We must have a clear plan to execute our strategy and meet our emissions reduction commitments.

Climate Action 2030 gives us the path forward. While the strategy sets ambitious targets, like achieving a 65 percent reduction in emissions department-wide by 2030, the core of the document tackles how to reach these targets.

The strategy starts with climate-informed decision making, which is why my team and I are so fortunate to be here in Fiji exchanging ideas with all of you.

Consideration of opportunities for climate mitigation is being integrated into the standard decision-making process for everything that we do.

Our ships, aircraft, vehicles, and installations account for the vast majority of our emissions, so we must also make them more energy efficient. And I know from being here you are doing everything you can to accomplish your goals.

We are investing in everything from hybrid propulsion to energy efficiency in our facilities to electric vehicles.

Wherever possible, we are planning the transition to renewable energy.

As an electrical engineering major at the Naval Academy, I am excited by our use of lithium ion batteries and next generation green technology.

These efforts are a priority for our Navy, especially in the Pacific.  

For us, the islands of the Pacific are sacred ground. They are precious. 80 years ago, our Marines and Sailors sacrificed blood and treasure alongside the people of your nations for freedom and peace together.  We fought together, from island to island, shoulder to shoulder.

Protecting that sacred ground today means that, once again, we must work together as a team. We must come together to face down an existential threat. As significant as the one we faced 80 years ago.

We share your urgency. All nations must step up and do their part. It is our responsibility to do so, and that includes the United States.

As the Prime Minister of Fiji said, failing decisive action, the “Pacific as we know it is doomed.”

I understand the gravity of his message. Indeed, I empathize with it.

I came to the United States with my family as a refugee from the island nation of Cuba.  For my parents, the existential threat was Fidel Castro’s totalitarianism.  

Now as a father and new grandfather myself, I think about how much the world has changed in my lifetime, and the world I will leave to my children and grand daughter. I know we have little time to head off the unimaginable hardships, mass dislocation and ultimately existential consequences facing future generations of young people.

I know how painful it is to unexpectedly lose your home and to have to start over again.  I also know that life is not about mere survival but also, as the founding fathers of my nation so eloquently expressed, our inalienable, universal right as humans to the pursuit of life, liberty and happiness.  

My parents were poor and only wanted a better life for me.  They worked hard to give me a chance to thrive and prosper. It wasn’t easy, they struggled and persevered.  But unlike parents today, my Mother and Father did not have to raise me in the face of climate hardships yet to manifest.  Those head winds are blowing strong now. The storm is gathering. I know we must solve the climate challenge if our children and grandchildren are to have any chance to prosper or even survive.

Climate change challenges have already darkened your doorsteps. Displacement and forced climate migrations could soon be a more prevalent reality for countless citizens across the Blue Pacific Continent.

I want you to know the United States stands with you in confronting and prevailing over that unacceptable outcome. We fight alongside you to protect your people, your land, and your way of life.

It is a collective, global responsibility to ensure climate change does not drive you from your homes.  It is also a collective, global responsibility that climate change does not rob you of your way of life and your culture.  

At President Biden’s direction, we are ready, willing, and able to take on this fight.

This is the fight of a generation. We understand that you are fighting for your very existence. I hope you understand that you have a partner in us.

In closing, thank you all for your time and attention today, and for your efforts to make your home and our world a better place.  I want you to know as I close, I am an optimist. Despite the challenges we face here for together. We will solve this but have to.

May God bless each of you.

I now look forward to your questions.  

Vinaka Vaka Levu. (Thank You)

Security News: Assistant Attorney General Matthew G. Olsen Delivers Keynote Address at George Washington University Program on Extremism Symposium

Source: United States Department of Justice News

Remarks as Prepared for Delivery

Good afternoon. For those of you who don’t know me, I am Matt Olsen, the Assistant Attorney General for National Security at the Department of Justice. I’ve been in this position since November of last year, but I first came to NSD at its inception in 2006 as the senior career official overseeing the Department’s intelligence work.

NSD was the first new Division created at DOJ in nearly a half century. Its founding vision was to consolidate the national security components of DOJ into a single team to carry out the Department’s mission of combatting terrorism, espionage and other threats to national security.

In the wake of 9/11, NSD fostered collaboration and unity of purpose across DOJ as well as with the intelligence community. As a Division, NSD unites prosecutors with attorneys across the intelligence community to ensure that we approach national security threats using every tool and resource available to the federal government. So that founding vision continues to guide us today, even as the office and the scope of its work has grown over the years.

Over the past decade, NSD has grown significantly in size and in the range of its work. In addition to combatting international and domestic terrorism, the Division handles matters addressing nation state cyber threats, sanctions evasion and other threats to our national security.

The work of NSD attorneys varies from representing the government in federal district and circuit courts, including the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court; vetting for national security concerns with sensitive potential foreign investments in the United States; participating in policy and legislative initiatives addressing the most pressing national security issues of the day; and helping American victims of overseas terrorism.

NSD’s evolution reflects the growth and changes in the threats we face. Yet from day one, counterterrorism has been at the core of our mission. That remains true today.

When I was first at NSD, we predominantly focused on combatting international terrorism by groups like al-Qaida. Those threats have not gone away, and we continue to face the threat of terrorist attacks on the homeland by foreign terrorist groups, especially ISIS. DOJ works every day with our partners at the FBI and across the intelligence community to identify and disrupt foreign terrorist plots and to bring to justice those who would do us harm.

Over the last few years, our country has seen the threat posed by domestic terrorism and hate crimes increase – it’s an alarming trend that we must confront. Communities across the United States have seen first-hand the terrible costs inflicted by terrorism and violent extremism.

Last month, in Buffalo, New York, a gunman killed 10 people at a grocery store. We’ve said that Department is investigating that matter as a hate crime and an act of racially-motivated violent extremism. This morning, Attorney General Garland announced that the Department has filed a criminal complaint charging the perpetrator with multiple counts of committing a hate crime resulting in death, committing a hate crime involving an attempt to kill and for using a firearm to commit murder.

As the Attorney General said, these acts of violence not only terrorize the people who are attacked, they harm entire communities. And we will be relentless in combatting such acts of violence.

We also see this rising threat in the horrific attacks in Pittsburgh, El Paso, Charlottesville and elsewhere. Many other plots or threats have been disrupted. Just since the spring of 2020, the number of FBI investigations of suspected domestic violent extremists has more than doubled.

As when I started at NSD in 2006, some of the most acute law enforcement challenges arise in combatting terrorism, only this time the threat is both international and domestic.

Today, the most significant terrorist threat to the United States is posed by lone actors or small cells who typically radicalize online and look to attack soft targets using easily accessible weapons. We see these threats manifested in two groups of extremists, both of which involve actors based in the United States: domestic violent extremists and homegrown violent extremists.

Domestic violent extremists, or DVEs, are individuals who seek to commit violent criminal acts in furtherance of social or political goals stemming from domestic influences — such as racial or ethnic bias, or anti-government or anti-authority sentiments. By contrast, homegrown violent extremists, or HVEs, are individuals who are inspired primarily by foreign terrorist groups, but who are not receiving specific direction from those groups. That said, these individuals are often motivated and inspired by a mix of socio-political, ideological and personal grievances against their targets.

Whether they draw inspiration from foreign or domestic influences, once these individuals decide to commit acts of violence, they pose similar and significant challenges for law enforcement.

Because of the insular and often rapid nature of their radicalization and mobilization to violence – including limited discussion of plans with others and the use of encrypted communications – there are fewer opportunities to detect and disrupt plots before they happen. These actors have access to easily available, extremely powerful weapons. And we have to be clear about this – the ability of violent extremists to acquire military-grade weapons in this country contributes to their ability to kill and inflict harm on a mass scale. They often choose soft targets such as houses of worship, retail locations and mass public gatherings. Tragically, we know from experience how these factors can be a deadly combination.

I want to emphasize that this is among the most challenging and complex threat landscapes that I have seen in over 20 years working in counterterrorism. We know that countering the threat of violent extremism inside the United States will continue to require sustained attention and resources. And we need to rise to meet this growing threat, while still maintaining our focus on terrorist organizations based overseas.

Let me turn to how we respond. And here’s a bit of good news: our experience over the past 20 years provides us hard-earned lessons. We have built, over the years, a long and mostly successful record of combatting international terrorism. As we confront the rising threat of domestic terrorism, we must bring to bear the insights we have gained over the past two decades.

I’ll highlight some of those key counterterrorism lessons and discuss briefly how they inform and guide our approach.

First, our work must be driven by threat intelligence to be effective. This means ensuring that we carefully track data and rely on professional analysis to refine our strategy, priorities and resources over time.

This work is already well-underway at DOJ when it comes to domestic extremism. Early last year, the Department issued new guidance to the field on reporting and tracking investigations related to domestic terrorism. As the Deputy Attorney General noted earlier this week, we are taking a data-driven approach to understanding the threat and to marshaling a coordinated, nation-wide response.

We are continually working to learn more not just about the scope of the problem, but also the nature of the threats and threat actors. For example, the Intelligence Community assess that racially or ethnically motivated violent extremists are the most likely to conduct mass-casualty attacks against civilians.

We also know that white supremacist groups have the most persistent and concerning transnational connections. But they are not the only category we are concerned about. While racially motivated extremists were the primary source of lethal attacks by violent extremists in 2018 and 2019, three of the four lethal DVE attacks in 2020 were carried out by individuals the FBI categorizes as “Anti-Government or Anti-Authority” extremists.

This threat-driven approach requires that we preserve the operational flexibility to adjust to a threat landscape that can shift rapidly. Our strategy is designed to reinforce the focus, expertise and resources demanded by the DT threat, while also ensuring that all resources remain available for the full range of counterterrorism needs.

Second, we must leverage the full range of our legal authorities to prevent, investigate and prosecute all forms of terrorism. In the international terrorism context, this often means leveraging military, law enforcement, intelligence and diplomatic capabilities. When it comes to domestic violent extremism, where law enforcement tools are paramount, we look to deploy a range of criminal and civil laws.

For example, acts of domestic terrorism may also constitute hate crimes. A hate crime — which is violence motivated by things like race, religion, gender or sexual orientation — might also be designed to coerce a civilian population or influence government policy, which is the domestic terrorism definition. When that happens, we ask: What is the best and strongest tool in DOJ’s arsenal we can use to respond?  How can we be as effective as possible to hold those who terrorize our communities accountable and to achieve justice for the victims?

One thing we have found is that when it comes to racially motivated domestic terrorism, such as white supremacist violence, often hate crimes statutes are the most effective tools. The recent events in Buffalo are a good example of that – the Civil Rights Division is taking the lead and NSD is supporting them. Based on those facts, we feel that is the strongest possible position for the Department. At the end of the day, we’re one team working together to deliver justice.

Third, as with international terrorism, domestic terrorism cases are of national importance and require national-level coordination. NSD was created to address exactly these kinds of challenges: to balance equities, provide subject matter expertise and training, and ensure consistency in approach and unity of purpose.

Now we, along with the FBI, are rising to meet the challenges of the current threat landscape. And critically this is an area in which coordination is essential to protect civil rights and civil liberties and to ensure that constitutionally protected activity is never viewed through the lens of national security threats.

We have learned from IT how to strike the right balance between headquarters and the field to ensure appropriate leadership visibility, expertise and support are given to terrorism matters – while recognizing that the frontline work is taking place in U.S. Attorneys’ Offices and FBI Field Offices throughout the country. This is not just a bureaucratic point. All of us who have worked in or with federal law enforcement know how critical it is to get that balance right.

Fourth, we must remember the importance of partnerships to an effective counterterrorism response. That includes partnerships across the federal government, with state and local law enforcement, and with international authorities.

Each U.S. Attorney’s Office coordinates a group of federal and state and local officials in each district – we call it the Anti-Terrorism Advisory Council or ATAC, for short. The ATACs work in close partnership with Joint Terrorism Task Forces in the FBI to promote training and information-sharing among our law enforcement partners, in both international and domestic terrorism matters.

This training and information-sharing is critical given that there are many more state and local law enforcement officers on the ground than there are federal agents. They are likely to be the first law enforcement officials to identify individuals planning terrorist acts within their communities. When it comes to preventing attacks before they can happen, federal, state and local partners work together to evaluate terrorist threats and determine whether federal or state intervention is possible to disrupt a plot and protect the public.

Fifth, our counterterrorism priority is prevention. We recognize that prevention demands a broader response. We need to engage with civil society and draw on tools to understand paths to radicalization, including providing support to community engagement, to efforts to prevent targeted violence and to work addressing mental health issues that may lead to violence.

At DOJ, we are providing technical assistance and training to state and local law enforcement through a newly-created Anti-Terrorism Training Program, developing resources for local law enforcement agencies on terrorism prevention and hate crimes, and conducting community engagements and providing prevention resources through a designated website for training state and local officials.

Sixth, and I think most importantly, we must adhere to our core values, no matter the magnitude of the threat or the challenges it may pose. These values are our source of national strength – and they are the foundation for all our work. We will zealously protect the First Amendment freedoms of speech, assembly and association. We must cherish those fundamental commitments, even when confronted with words and beliefs that are abhorrent and painful to us and our fellow Americans.

Many of the domestic violent extremists who have committed acts of terror in recent years – in Charleston, in El Paso, in Charlottesville, in Buffalo – have been animated by the hateful ideology of racism, intolerance and white supremacy specifically. We should not hesitate to say that such views are wrong and betray core American values. And we must be candid that such views are part of an ideology that is increasingly mobilizing individuals to commit acts of violence.

But in the United States, hate itself is not a crime. DOJ investigates and prosecutes violent extremists for their criminal acts and not for their beliefs or based on their associations, and regardless of ideology. We are committed to protecting the constitutional rights and civil liberties of all Americans and to safeguarding the exercise of protected speech, peaceful protests and political activity. The Department of Justice does not and will not open investigations solely based on First Amendment-protected activity.

We hold sacred the rights of individuals to peacefully exercise those freedoms. But when individuals or groups try to promote or impose an ideology through acts or threats of violence, those acts can be among the most dangerous crimes we confront as a society. When violent extremists seek to hurt others in the name of ideology – any ideology – we will use every tool we have to deter and disrupt such acts, to keep people safe, and to bring perpetrators to justice.

I’ll end by sharing a little bit about what we are doing to apply these lessons to our efforts combatting domestic violent extremism.

Earlier this year I announced that we would be creating a Domestic Terrorism Unit within our counterterrorism section. Last month, we formally stood up that unit following consultations with the Department’s leadership, the Civil Rights Division, the FBI and other DOJ components.

Drawing on expertise across NSD and the Department more broadly, the DT Unit has several functions:  prosecuting and coordinating domestic terrorism cases; developing training and policies on domestic terrorism matters; and supporting the work of the Department in implementing a whole-of-government strategy on countering domestic terrorism. The unit’s structure preserves flexibility and allows us to better support the FBI, which has dedicated teams for handling domestic terrorism and international terrorism matters.

We recognize that countering domestic terrorism must be a whole-of-Department effort. We are committed to building a structure for Department of Justice components, including the Civil Rights Division and federal prosecutors around the country, to work collaboratively and bring to bear all available tools to hold violent extremists accountable.

With the DT Unit in place, we are currently developing internal DOJ policies to ensure that NSD’s involvement in significant domestic terrorism matters will align with our long-standing role in international terrorism cases. These changes will ensure a threat-driven, consistent, nation-wide approach to combatting the threat.

Just as importantly, the DT Unit can act as a critical safeguard to ensure that we address the threat in a manner that is consistent with our values. In this work, as in all our of our work, we remain committed to protecting the constitutional rights and civil liberties of all Americans.

I’ll conclude by echoing what the Attorney General said this morning in Buffalo about the threats that violent extremism poses to the safety of the American people and American democracy. For the Justice Department, confronting these crimes is a legal obligation and a moral obligation. No one, when they go to the grocery store or the office or their place of worship or anywhere else, should have to live in fear of violence.

Thank you again for having me and I look forward to your questions.

Security News: North Carolina Nail Salon Owner Sentenced to 15 Years in Prison for Compelling a Victim’s Labor for Almost Two Years

Source: United States Department of Justice News

U.S. District Court Judge Kenneth D. Bell sentenced defendant Thuy Tien Luong, 38, of Charlotte, North Carolina, to 15 years in prison and ordered her to pay $75,000 in restitution to the victim. A federal jury previously convicted the defendant of forced labor on Jan. 8, 2021, following a five-day trial.

According to the evidence presented at trial, the defendant compelled the victim’s labor for almost two years through a variety of coercive means. The defendant physically, emotionally and verbally punished the victim when she disobeyed the defendant or otherwise failed to perform the required labor to the defendant’s satisfaction. As an example, the defendant falsely claimed that the victim owed her a debt of $180,000, made her sign a debt contract, and threatened to go to the police if the victim did not continue to work to pay off the fabricated debt. The defendant beat the victim with nail salon tools, including cuticle clippers, nail files and brooms leaving the victim with scars, bruises and marks. She also threatened to ruin the victim’s reputation with her family by threatening to tell them information that would negatively impact the victim’s relationship with her family. The defendant’s scheme caused the victim to continue working for the defendant until a particularly violent assault led her to report the defendant to the Davidson Police Department.  

“This defendant used psychological coercion, debt bondage and violence to break down the will of one of her employees, exploit her vulnerabilities and force her to work long hours under threat of serious harm,” said Assistant Attorney General Kristen Clarke of the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division. “There continues to be no place for such cruel conduct in our society, and the Department of Justice remains committed to identifying and eliminating human trafficking.”

“Human trafficking is human suffering and it has no place in modern society,” said U.S. Attorney Dena J. King of the Western District of North Carolina. “As our nation prepares to commemorate Juneteenth, it’s difficult to grasp that there are still people in our communities subjected to a life of servitude, compelled to work long hours for little or no pay, abused physically and mentally by those who ‘employ’ them. Traffickers who use their victims as commodities, take advantage of their needs and exploit their vulnerabilities for personal gain will be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.”

“Luong’s egregious criminal conduct is a form of human trafficking that not only exploited our nation’s labor laws, but also subjected the victim to unspeakable harm, including physical and mental abuse,” said Special Agent in Charge Ronnie Martinez, who oversees Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) operations in North Carolina and South Carolina. “Thankfully, HSI and its law enforcement partners have put an end to Luong’s activity and she is facing appropriately severe consequences. Pursuing human traffickers and protecting their victims remains a top priority of HSI.” 

Assistant Attorney General Clarke, U.S. Attorney King and Special Agent in Charge Martinez announced today’s sentence. The case was investigated by HSI with assistance from the Davidson Police Department and Charlotte-Mecklenburg Police Department. It was prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Kimlani M. Ford of the Western District of North Carolina and Trial Attorney Maryam Zhuravitsky of the Civil Rights Division’s Human Trafficking Prosecution Unit. Trial Attorney Jessica Arco of the Civil Rights Division’s Human Trafficking Prosecution Unit assisted with sentencing and restitution in this matter.

Anyone who has information about human trafficking should report that information to the National Human Trafficking Hotline toll-free at 1-888-373-7888, which is available 24 hours a day, seven days a week. For more information about human trafficking, please visit www.humantraffickinghotline.org.