Dayton man sentenced to more than 20 years in prison for dealing fentanyl cocaine mixture that caused multiple fatal & nonfatal overdoses

Source: United States Department of Justice News

DAYTON, Ohio – A Dayton man was sentenced in U.S. District Court to 250 months in prison for distributing fentanyl and cocaine that resulted in overdoses in the late hours of New Year’s Eve and into the early hours of New Year’s Day 2019.

Kelsey V. Williams, Jr., 41, was indicted by a federal grand jury in the Southern District of Ohio in May 2021 and arrested in June 2021 in Minnesota. He pleaded guilty in federal court in Dayton in January 2022.

According to court documents, on New Year’s Eve 2018 and New Year’s Day 2019, the defendant distributed a fentanyl and cocaine mixture responsible for six total fatal and nonfatal overdoses. Of those six, four died from overdosing, and one was revived by Narcan following a vehicle crash that brought law enforcement and medics to his aid.

“Williams trafficked in drugs that directly resulted in overdoses,” said U.S. Attorney Kenneth L. Parker. “His crimes could not be more serious and have had a devastating impact on families in the Dayton area.”

Parker was joined by J. William Rivers, Special Agent in Charge, Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), Cincinnati Division; and Dayton Police Chief Kamran Afzal in announcing the sentence imposed yesterday by Senior U.S. District Judge Walter H. Rice. Assistant United States Attorneys Amy M. Smith and Ryan A. Saunders are representing the United States in this case.

This case is being prosecuted as part of Operation S.O.S. In July 2018, the Department of Justice announced the launch of Operation Synthetic Opioid Surge (S.O.S), a program aimed at reducing the supply of synthetic opioids in 10 high impact areas and identifying wholesale distribution networks and international and domestic suppliers.

This prosecution is part of an Organized Crime Drug Enforcement Task Force (OCDETF) investigation. OCDETF identifies, disrupts and dismantles the highest-level drug traffickers, money launderers, gangs and transnational criminal organizations that threaten the United States by using a prosecutor-led, intelligence-driven, multi-agency approach that leverages the strengths of federal, state and local law enforcement agencies against criminal networks.

# # #

Justice Department Secures Settlement in Religious Discrimination Suit Against Lansing, Michigan

Source: United States Department of Justice

The Justice Department announced today that it has entered into a consent decree with the City of Lansing, Michigan, that will resolve the department’s religious accommodation and retaliation lawsuit. 

The lawsuit alleged that the city violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 after discriminating and retaliating against Sylvia Coleman, a Seventh-day Adventist and former detention officer with the city’s police department. Title VII is a federal statute that prohibits employment discrimination based on race, color, national origin, sex and religion. Title VII also prohibits retaliation against employees who have made a charge, assisted or participated in an investigation, proceeding or hearing under Title VII.

“This lawsuit and consent decree demonstrate the department’s commitment to ensuring that all employees are protected from religious discrimination in the workplace,” said Assistant Attorney General Kristen Clarke of the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division. “With this consent decree, the city of Lansing will undertake actions necessary to protect the religious rights of employees in the workplace.”

The department’s amended complaint alleges that, on her first day of work, Coleman informed the city that she could not work a shift from sunset Friday to sunset Saturday because she observed the Sabbath as a Seventh-day Adventist. The amended complaint alleges that Coleman also informed the city of her religious observance during the application process. The department’s complaint asserted that instead of adequately attempting to reasonably accommodate Coleman’s religious observance, which Title VII requires, the city terminated her employment. The amended complaint further alleges the city retaliated against Coleman by filing a counterclaim against her because she intervened in the United States’ lawsuit.  

Under the consent decree’s terms, the city will submit to the department for approval religious accommodation and retaliation policies as well as proposed trainings on these policies. In addition, the city will pay Coleman $50,000 in backpay and compensatory damages. The consent decree is subject to approval by the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Michigan.

Trial Attorneys Sara Safriet, Robert Galbreath, Christopher Woolley and Dena Robinson of the Civil Rights Division’s Employment Litigation Section brought this case.

The enforcement of Title VII and other federal employment discrimination laws is a top priority of the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division. Additional information about the Civil Rights Division and its work is available on its websites at www.justice.gov/crt and www.justice.gov/crt/employment-litigation-section.

Hudson County Man Admits Participation In Conspiracy To Distribute Fentanyl

Source: United States Department of Justice News

NEWARK, N.J. – A Hudson County, New Jersey, man today admitted that he conspired to possess fentanyl with the intent to distribute, U.S. Attorney Philip R. Sellinger announced.

Miguel Polanco, 31, of Union City, New Jersey, pleaded guilty before U.S. District Court Judge Madeline Cox Arleo to an information charging him with one count of conspiracy to distribute and possess with intent to distribute 40 grams or more of a substance containing a detectable amount of fentanyl.

According to documents filed in this case and statements made in court:

In May 2021, U.S. Customs and Border Protection agents intercepted a package being shipped from Mexico City, Mexico, to Polanco at his apartment. Inspection of the package revealed that it contained a substance that tested positive for the presence of fentanyl.

Prior to receiving the package, Polanco received a video from a conspirator explaining how to properly remove the bags of fentanyl concealed inside the package to minimize the damage to its contents. Polanco also engaged in multiple conversations with conspirators where he learned of the quantity of fentanyl that would be sent to him as well as instruction on where to deliver the package after he received it. In exchange for receiving and transporting the package containing fentanyl, Polanco was to be paid.   

The conspiracy charge carries a statutory minimum of five years in prison, a maximum of 40 years in prison and a maximum fine of $5 million, or twice the gross amount of any pecuniary gain, whichever is greater.  Sentencing is scheduled for June 28, 2023.

U.S. Attorney Sellinger credited special agents of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Homeland Security Investigations, under the direction of Special Agent in Charge Ricky J. Patel in Newark and Deputy Special Agent in Charge Alejandro Amaro in Laredo, Texas; U.S. Custom and Border Protection – (Laredo) under the direction of Port Director Albert Flores in Laredo and Port Director Tenavel Thomas in Newark; postal inspectors with the U.S. Postal Inspection Service in Newark, under the direction of Inspector in Charge Christopher A. Nielsen, Philadelphia Division; and the Elizabeth Police Department, under the direction of Chief Giacommo Sacca, with the investigation leading to today’s guilty plea.

The government is represented by Assistant U.S. Attorney Thomas S. Kearney of the U.S. Attorney’s Office Special Prosecutions Unit in Newark.

Defense counsel: Adam Axel Esq., Assistant Federal Public Defender, Newark

Associate Attorney General Vanita Gupta Delivers Remarks at the Community Violence Intervention and Prevention Initiative Grantee Convening

Source: United States Department of Justice News

Remarks as Delivered

Thank you for those kind words and those important words, Amy, but more importantly, thank you for your outstanding leadership. It is a privilege to be with all of you here in St. Louis. Look at this room. It is incredible. Thank you for joining. Thank you for gathering here this morning.

I want to thank you, Pacia, for your powerful words. They’re the perfect way to open up this meeting — captivating, beautiful and inspiring. Thank you.

I am so pleased to be here, you don’t know. This work has been so important to the Justice Department, and we know how many of you have been toiling away for years and for decades, as Amy has said. I am pleased to be in this room which such an array of people working so hard in your communities.

I am pleased to be here with Commissioner Tracy. I know he is just weeks into his new position, but he brings tremendous experience and expertise and connectivity to the communities he’s worked in, and I am really pleased that he is and grateful for your commitment to strengthening relationships between the St. Louis Metropolitan Police Department and the communities it serves.

Eddie, it is wonderful to join you, too. I remain grateful for the wisdom and experience that you bring to the Justice Department, challenging us every day with the community violence work that you have done for so long. Your leadership in Chicago, and now for the country, is so incredible.

And I am thankful to all of you — community violence intervention specialists, law enforcement, public health professionals, service providers, local leaders and researchers. You have come together from cities across the country to learn from one another, to renew your dedication to the health and safety of your communities and to send a powerful message that we can prevent violence in America through collaboration, intervention and a collective commitment to change.

For too long, our society has looked to law enforcement alone to solve the problem of violence in our communities. We ask police to resolve deep, complex social challenges, primarily with the blunt instruments of arrest and incarceration. And every day across the country, police officers are doing everything they can with the tools that they have. But this approach in isolation has not been enough to curb violence in our communities.

That is why we included community-based violence prevention and intervention programs as one of the four foundational principles of the Justice Department’s Comprehensive Strategy for Reducing Violent Crime in May 2021. And it is one of the reasons Congress enacted the Bipartisan Safer Communities Act. The Justice Department announced yesterday $231 million in funding from the Act for states to put towards crisis intervention court proceedings, including extreme risk protection order programs that we know work to keep guns out of the hands of those who pose a threat to themselves or others. The Act also provided $50 million in funding for CVI programs, bringing our total investment right now to $100 million.

This is geared toward a more comprehensive approach, one that takes in the bigger picture and reframes the problem of violence as one in which every member of the community has a stake. It is an approach that centers the very communities that are impacted by violent crime, where community members, local leaders and law enforcement work together, as co-producers of public safety. It is both a strategy and a mindset, and it has the potential to transform our vision of safe and healthy communities.

It begins with the premise that violence is not inevitable — it is preventable. When we reject violence as a fixture in the landscape, we see clearly that no person is disposable. We give up on no one.

“Community violence intervention and prevention” doesn’t describe one particular kind of program or project, nor does it include all interventions that seek to address violence. Those of you in this room know that well. And, as you heard from Amy, there are some guiding principles for this approach.

CVI programs must be community-centered and equitable and inclusive. They must be evidence-informed — through research and evaluation, case studies and expert opinions. And finally, CVI programs must be effective and sustainable.

So, what does this look like in practice? 

Many of you have been embodying these principles in your work for years — in some cases, decades — and you’re continuing to build on it today. You’re training and deploying peacemakers in Los Angeles. You’re providing mental health services and peer mentoring to high-risk individuals in Baltimore. And you’re providing conflict resolution, mediation and other critical services to youth in Miami. This is just a snapshot of the different models and programs and projects that comprise CVI.

The federal government’s historic investment in this approach shows our commitment to working with you and to making sure that we are following the evidence and ensuring we are having a measurable impact and to continue doing what works.

Our approach must and should include law enforcement as vital partners. The work we are doing to build community safety infrastructure is a complement to their work, not in lieu of it. And many of you are working closely with law enforcement in your cities and communities, and I am confident that your work will be more effective and your communities will be better off because of your collaboration and partnership. The CVI approach, and the approach that you are doing to build and sustain it, reminds us that the problem of violence, including gun violence, is not a series of isolated events, but so often the culmination of long-standing unmet needs in communities. And it helps us to rethink how we actually conceptualize both the symptoms and the causes.

Darcel Clark, the Bronx County District Attorney and one of our partners, spoke recently at a graduation ceremony for the Bronx Osborne Gun Accountability and Prevention (BOGAP) Program, in which participants arrested for possessing a gun enter a year-long program with job training, therapy and conflict resolution skills-building, and ultimately have their guilty pleas dismissed — an alternative to a two-year prison sentence. DA Clark told the graduates what many of us have long believed — that their circumstances should not determine their destiny. When we see the full picture, including all the circumstances that may have shaped a person’s life, we find ourselves, like DA Clark, rooting for their success.

And in keeping with our guiding principles, I should also note that we awarded a grant last year to the John Jay College of Criminal Justice to study the BOGAP program, including an assessment of whether successful completion reduces recidivism rates and creates lasting change for participants.

Centering the community and looking at the full picture also means acknowledging that neighborhoods with high rates of violence are places that have been for so long underserved. One of our grants is supporting the New Kensington Community Development Corporation in the Kensington neighborhood in Philadelphia, which is facing high rates of unemployment and insufficient housing. This grant will help implement a CVI program in Kensington using the Cure Violence model. The model is evidence-based — evidence that has shown statistically significant reductions in gun violence, including a 30% reduction in shootings comparing two years pre-implementation with two years post-implementation. It treats gun violence as a disease, using violence interrupters and outreach workers to detect potential violence and interrupt it before a shooting occurs.

It is no secret that Black and brown communities have been historically under-resourced, and decades of disinvestment have taken a heavy toll. New investments — even the historic investments that we are making now through our grant programs — will not erase the imbalance. Reversing this age-old injustice will take time, but we must be firm in our commitment. And we must be patient and perseverant and persistent.

We’ll also need to be adaptable. No one intervention or program can solve the problem of violence in this country. Each of you brings unique solutions to difficult, sometimes unique problems. In some cases, you rely on credible messengers with deep ties to their communities and trained to work with those most at risk of engaging in violence. In others, you’re focusing on workforce development, social services, cognitive behavioral therapy or trauma-informed care. None of your programs look exactly alike. And that is both good and important. Tackling the problem of violence is this country needs creative thinking, innovative approaches and all hands on deck. It needs you.

Building community infrastructure helps to achieve two vital ends. First, it engenders trust. This is trust among members of a community, between the community and the police, and in the justice system itself — all essential ingredients in the prevention and reduction of violence. Community-police trust and justice go hand in hand with safety. Any effort to achieve one without the other is bound to fail. As I say this all the time: public safety depends on community trust, and it depends on justice.

Second, grounding public safety in the community is the surest way to a fair and equitable system of justice. Community violence exposes long-standing inequities that we cannot ignore, and if we hope to solve the problem of violence in America, we must also deliver on our nation’s promise of equal justice.

This is not just a new way of doing business – this is a bold re-thinking of what safety and justice means in our society. And CVI is one of many ways that we can empower people to take ownership of safety in their communities, and to share some of the burden with law enforcement.

Last year, our Bureau of Justice Assistance funded a new effort called “Reimagining Justice,” a phrase that captures exactly what we’re trying to achieve. Through a grant to the Newark Public Safety Collaborative, based out of Rutgers University, we are supporting an effort to test new community safety strategies that complement traditional enforcement measures. The mission is to put data and research into the hands of community stakeholders so they can be part of the design and development of community safety solutions.

Co-responder models, which pair law enforcement with behavioral health professionals and community responder programs, which train civilian first responders, are showing promise in a number of cities. Our Connect and Protect Program is supporting these alliances between law enforcement, police departments and public health experts, and we have seen that they are helping to keep people out of jail and on the road to treatment and recovery.

Equal justice and community safety are monumental challenges that have repeatedly, throughout our history, defied solutions. We will not find answers overnight. And we have to be prepared for setbacks and skepticism. And no doubt you’ve encountered your share of both. We will need to learn from the setbacks, looking closely at what works and what doesn’t and finding out why, leaning on the data and research to help us adapt and adjust. And we’ll have to guard against the skeptics who say that crime and violence are matters best left only to the police alone, at the expense of recognizing the crucial role community members and leaders play in co-creating safety.

We know — and you have seen firsthand — that community-based approaches to these problems work and will continue to work. That is why one of our central tenets must be the importance and the power of rigorous research and evaluation. We are deepening the body of evidence so we can broaden our coalition of support and build on the robust groundwork that you have laid and are continuing to lay here today and this week.

What you are doing in your communities is remarkable. You are showing people that there are better options than violence and retaliation. You are letting them know that they are more than the trauma that they have seen and suffered. And you are finding a way to bring hope and opportunity into places that have seen too little of either.

I am proud that the Justice Department is supporting you in this essential work, work that is making a difference in the lives that you touch and the communities that you serve. And we know that you need to take care of yourselves too as you do this work.

I am grateful for all that you do. Thank you for your leadership, for your inspiration and for your time today. Stay hopeful my friends.

3 women indicted for conspiring to place arson device in local nail salon

Source: United States Department of Justice News

CINCINNATI – A federal grand jury indicted three women today on charges related to the attempted arson of a nail salon in Monroe, Ohio.

It is alleged that Kim Lien Vu, 45, of Liberty Township, Ohio; Cierra Marie Bishop, 29, of Hamilton, Ohio; and Makahla Ann Rennick, 18, of Hamilton, Ohio, were responsible for initiating an incendiary device at Bora Bora Nail Salon on Hamilton-Lebanon Road in Monroe with the intent of destroying the facility.

It is alleged that Vu enlisted the other defendants to build and help plant the device. Ohio Secretary of State records show that Vu owns two nail salons: Allure Nails Vu LLC and Love Nail Vu LLC.

An affidavit filed in support of a criminal complaint details that on Feb. 5, surveillance camera footage shows Bishop and Rennick entering the salon. Rennick had made an appointment for a pedicure under the name “Katelynn,” allegedly at the direction of Vu for Rennick to get the latest nail appointment she can and to “Just use another name. Sound white.” Rennick is shown receiving her nail services.

Bishop allegedly sat near Rennick during the pedicure and is then seen walking toward the rear of the salon holding two white bags. Bishop placed one of the bags behind a desk before leaving the salon.

A salon employee then found the suspected device, which smelled like gasoline. The employee opened the package, seeing that it looked like an explosive device, and took it outside near the salon’s dumpsters. The employee later went back outside to check on the device and noticed that it was burning.

Monroe police officers responded to a call reporting a dumpster fire near the salon.

Text messages on Bishop’s and Rennick’s phones show the co-defendants planning the incident for at least one week.

Maliciously damaging or destroying property, or attempting to maliciously damage or destroy property, via a fire or explosive device is a federal crime punishable by a range of five to 20 years in prison. Conspiring to commit malicious destruction via fire is punishable by up to five years in prison.

Kenneth L. Parker, United States Attorney for the Southern District of Ohio; J. William Rivers, Special Agent in Charge, Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), Cincinnati Division; Daryl S. McCormick, Special Agent in Charge, U.S. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms & Explosives (ATF); Angie Salazar, Special Agent in Charge, U.S. Homeland Security Investigations (HSI); and Monroe Police Chief Bob Buchanan. Assistant United States Attorney Timothy S. Mangan is representing the United States in this case.

An indictment merely contains allegations, and defendants are presumed innocent unless proven guilty in a court of law.

# # #