Defense News: Precision Under Pressure – U.S. Navy Divers Showcase Expertise in Afloat Salvage Operations

Source: United States Navy

Afloat Salvage Exercise 24-2, previously named Expeditionary Battle Damage Response Exercise, was designed to train and evaluate Navy Divers’ and EOD technicians’ ability to access and assess shipboard damages and repair them in a simulated wartime environment, improving the Navy’s ability to respond to combat damage control and to increase salvage effectiveness.

“Navy mobile diving and salvage companies and EOD platoons maintain readiness to conduct afloat salvage and render safe procedures aboard Navy and joint assets anytime, anywhere,” said Cmdr. Garrett Pankow, commanding officer, MDSU 2. “Our training aboard NAVSEA 21 INACT ships in Philadelphia, PA provided EOD Group 2 forces a controlled shipboard environment for our sailors to simulate damage and explosive hazards on vessels afloat and exercise our capability to mitigate shipboard damage and explosive hazards. This was our third iteration of training in Philadelphia, and we continue to improve our warfighting readiness to support the Fleet.”

During the exercise, several different training objectives were met, such as damage control assessment, anti-terrorism force protection dives, render safe procedures on inert ordnance, damage surveys in the ship’s flooded ballast tanks, patch building and dewatering, and salvage of the ship’s damaged spaces while simulating an at-sea vessel.

Historically, the U.S. Navy has suffered ship damaging events such as the devastating attack on USS Stark (FFG 31) by an Iraqi F-1 Mirage fighter jet in 1987, and the terrorist attack on USS Cole (DDG 67) by suicide bombers in the Aden Harbor, Yemen, on Oct. 12, 2000. These events caused significant flooding and shipboard damage and took the ships out of the fight.

When faced with conducting damage control operations at this magnitude, a ship’s necessary systems and manning to repair such damages may be limited or exhausted. This is where Navy Divers and EOD technicians can provide unique support to the Fleet.

In 2000, when Navy Divers from MDSU 2, detachment Alpha, were rapidly deployed to the scene of the attack on USS Cole, they were immediately faced with the deadly and tragic aftermath of the bombing.

“Our first glimpse of the ship that night will be forever fixed in our minds,” said Chief Warrant Officer 2 Frank Perna, in the first days of their salvage operation of Cole.

“Get in the water,” Perna thought. “Get the Cole back.”

They had a mission at hand, and brothers and sisters in arms to help. So, that is exactly what they did.

24 years later, Navy Divers from the same diving and salvage unit, MDSU 2, are training for a similar mission in the footsteps of Warrant Officer Perna.

“Taking lessons from recent events such as the damage incurred from the missile strikes to USS Stark (FFG 31) in 1987, the mine strike of USS Samuel B. Robert (FFG 58) in 1988, and the attack on USS Cole (DDG 67) in 2000, I did not want to just teach our Navy Divers about the responses to those casualties through lectures or tabletop exercises,” said Lt. Cmdr. Benjamin Carroll, MDSU’s salvage engineer. “Personally, I learn best through on-the-job and hands on training. What better way to learn and expand our capabilities to best support the Fleet than to create actual damage scenarios that enable our [Sailors] to hone their skills in afloat salvage techniques?”

Afloat salvage capabilities are a critical mission Navy Divers and EOD technicians are training toward in order to significantly enhance the U.S. Navy’s, as well as NATO Allies’ and partners’, capability to keep vessels operational while in a forward deployed status. The main goal is minimizing damage and ‘keeping our ships in the fight’ after sustaining casualties.

At this exercise, Navy Divers from MDSU 2 had the chance to access, patch and dewater spaces after a simulated missile attack where ordnance failed to detonate, causing major flooding and damage to bulkheads on the ex-USS Fort McHenry.

Flooded ballast tanks with imposed bulkhead penetrations simulated the type of real world scenario Navy Divers may be tasked to respond to in the future.

Before adressing repairs, EOD technicians and Navy Divers had to methodically disarm and render safe an inert rocket shape in the ballast tank. After safely removing the rocket shape, Navy Divers constructed three patches for the affected bulkheads. Once the patches were in place, they dewatered 40,000 gallons of water from the space.

“This was a great opportunity to teach younger divers that diving is not always going to be in warm, sunny and flat seas in Florida,” said Navy Diver First Class Robert Brookins, leading petty officer of MDSU 2 Co. 2-4. “This training event was an eye opener to the gravity of these kind of real-life scenarios that we could be faced with. I’m glad we were able to flex our capabilities and show that our team can work in tight spaces and passageways which restrict the normal dive operations we routinely conduct.”

This exercise also offered a platform to integrate Navy EOD mobile units and Navy Diver companies into one team with one mission, allowing them to exchange skills and tactics with a common objective.

“Working together presents us [EOD technicians and Navy Divers] as a package, capable of fixing more than the normal task at hand,” said Lt. Brent Lawson, training officer of EODMU 6. “It’s a force multiplier for us to be working together to solve these problems. Navy EOD is standing by to support the fleet in these types of emergencies.”

These valuable learning experiences between the diving and EOD communities will further enhance MDSU 2’s afloat salvage mission sets, changing the way the Navy can operate in combative environments which have the potential to present these types of casualties that could require salvors and EOD technicians to integrate with and support ships’ crews in wartime.

Afloat salvage capabilities will enable Navy Divers and EOD technicians to repair damage to a vessel on the battlefield and allow ships the opportunity to reach forward repair sites during conflict. This training event was one of the first of its kind for the Navy special operations community to develop and train on the tactics, techniques, and procedures involved in shipboard damage control and salvage.

EODGRU 2 operates as part of Navy Expeditionary Combat Command and provides skilled, capable, and combat-ready deployable Navy EOD and Navy Diver forces around the globe to support a range of operations.

For the full collection of photos from Afloat Salvage Exercise, and news about U.S. Navy Divers and Navy EOD and Explosive Ordnance Disposal Group 2, visit https://www.dvidshub.net/unit/EODG-2.

Defense News: FRCE marks 150th F-35 induction

Source: United States Navy

Fleet Readiness Center East (FRCE) marked a milestone in its support of the F-35 Lightning II program when the depot recently inducted and completed modifications on its 150th F-35 and returned the aircraft to the Fleet.

FRCE is the lead site for depot-level maintenance on the F-35B Lightning II and has conducted modifications and repair on the Marine Corps’ short takeoff-vertical landing variant of the aircraft since 2013. The depot has also worked with the F-35A (conventional takeoff and landing) and F-35C (carrier) variants.

“The F-35 plays such a crucial role in our national defense,” said FRCE Commanding Officer Capt. Randy Berti. “It is the next-generation strike aircraft weapon systems for the Navy, Air Force, Marines and our allies. It gives our warfighters unprecedented capabilities. We’re extremely proud of the support we provide for this aircraft.

“The F-35 was completely new when the first aircraft was inducted in 2013,” continued Berti. “There were a lot of unknowns. Inducting our 150th F-35 highlights how far we’ve come and how dedicated and innovative our people are. They were constantly breaking new ground and they continue to do that today.”

Dustin Schultz, an aircraft planner and estimator with FRCE’s F-35 team, was one of those trailblazers.

“Everything was brand new in the beginning,” said Schultz. “From engineering support to tooling and logistics, we were starting from scratch. We had one aircraft with six of us working on it. Now we have 130 artisans working on the F-35 alone. That’s a lot of growth.

“We have other aircraft programs that are sundowning,” he continued. “The F-35 is filling that gap now as we move forward.”

According to Ike Rettenmair, FRCE’s F-35 branch head, the depots F-35 workload has grown exponentially over the years and is expected to expand further.

“I was in the hangar as a Harrier mechanic when the first F-35 rolled in,” said Rettenmair. “We’ve grown from that one stall to what will soon be multiple hangars of F-35s. The F-35 plays such a significant role in the U.S. military with more and more continuing to enter the Fleet. The number of F-35s used by international partners is also growing. Our F-35 workload goes hand in hand with all of this.”

As the F-35 program continues to grow at the depot, Rettenmair said FRCE continues to expand and develop key F-35 support elements.

FRCE declared capability on its first F-35 component – meaning FRCE is now a verified source of repair and testing for that item – in 2020. Since then, the depot has declared capability on approximately 76 different components for the Lightning II and continues to stand up capability.

In 2023, FRCE personnel became the first within the Department of Defense to perform the successful assembly of a lift fan clutch for the F-35B Lightning II aircraft outside of the original manufacturer’s facility. Additionally, F-35B vertical lift fan testing and processing facilities are scheduled to come online at FRCE in early 2025.

The depot is also capable of bringing F-35 support to the warfighter when and where it’s needed. FRCE’s F-35 Rapid Response Team, made up of highly skilled, cross-trained aircraft maintenance professionals, can deploy at a moment’s notice to any location, from a Marine Corps Air Station halfway around the globe to a Navy aircraft carrier afloat in the Indo-Pacific region.

FRCE’s F-35 support isn’t limited to aircraft repair and modification or component capabilities. Don Werner, an aircraft planner and estimator with FRCE’s F-35 team,  said the lessons learned and the innovation that occurred over the years while expanding FRCE’s F-35 program have also found their way to the warfighter.

“There are so many entities within FRC East working on things you would never even think of,” said Werner. “They create things and come up with ideas that enable us to get aircraft to the warfighter even faster while saving money in the long run. They create things that make the job easier and these go out to the whole Fleet.”

In addition to mechanics, Werner said the team includes quality assurance personnel, parts and logistics experts, planners, engineers and even fabric workers who design and produce heavy-duty protective covers for the aircraft’s tires, intakes and other parts.

“You can see people right here at the depot working on all these things,” said Werner. “They’re designing it, going down to manufacturing and coming up with the tools or equipment our people need because there’s nobody out there that’s going to get it to us in such a timely manner.”

Schultz said the warfighter benefits from the innovative processes and procedures the depot’s F-35 team has come up with over the years.

“We’ve had many modifications that come through here that we were performing for the first time ever,” said Schultz. “The manufacturer would say this mod is going to take 10,000 hours and our artisans and engineers would go look at it and end up saving thousands of hours because they came up with a new way to do the job that nobody else had thought of.”

According to Rettenmair, the success and expansion of the F-35 program at FRCE, lies with the depot’s personnel. He credited their dedication and innovation as instrumental in establishing the reputation of FRCE’s F-35 program.

“We’ve made a name for ourselves as the F-35 facility for depot maintenance,” said Rettenmair. ”It shows the trust and confidence the enterprise has in FRC East to do this work. That trust is a testament to the people working here who’ve earned us this reputation.”

He said everyone at FRCE, no matter what their job, is committed to supporting the Fleet by providing the highest quality, combat ready aircraft and components.

“Every day when we come to work, we know why we’re here,” said Rettenmair. “We deliver product back to the Fleet so the warfighter has what he or she needs to fight and win. The people working here take a lot of pride in that.”

FRCE is North Carolina’s largest maintenance, repair, overhaul and technical services provider, with more than 4,000 civilian, military and contract workers. Its annual revenue exceeds $1 billion. The depot provides service to the fleet while functioning as an integral part of the greater U.S. Navy; Naval Air Systems Command; and Commander, Fleet Readiness Centers.

Learn more at www.navair.navy.mil/frce or https://www.facebook.com/FleetReadinessCenterEast.

Justice Department Files Civil Forfeiture Complaint Against Sanctioned Oligarch’s U.S. Music Studio Sale Proceeds

Source: United States Department of Justice Criminal Division

Note: View the complaint here.

A civil forfeiture complaint was filed today for $3.4 million in proceeds from the sale of a music studio in Burbank, California. The complaint alleges that the proceeds, which are beneficially owned by Russian oligarch Oleg Deripaska, are the proceeds of sanctions violations. An indictment charging Deripaska with sanctions violations had been unsealed on Sept. 29, 2022, and Deripaska remains at large.

“As the allegations in the complaint once again demonstrate, those who have illicitly accumulated great wealth in support of lawlessness and international chaos invariably turn to the safety and stability of the United States’ rule of law principles in order to preserve their ill-gotten gains. It is predictable, hypocritical, and illegal,” said Co-Director Michael Khoo of Task Force KleptoCapture. “We are nearly three years into Russia’s unprovoked further invasion of Ukraine, but today’s actions show that Task Force KleptoCapture remains vigilant and fully engaged in its mission to protect the American financial system against the abuses of criminal actors.”

“Today’s filing of a civil forfeiture complaint against over $3 million in illicit proceeds of Oleg Deripaska exemplifies this office’s commitment to utilizing all available legal remedies to enforce our critical sanctions program,” said U.S. Attorney Damian Williams for the Southern District of New York. “We remain committed to piercing the opaque financial networks utilized by sanctioned oligarchs attempting to illegally transact business in U.S. dollars.”

“As alleged, Oleg Deripaska, an OFAC Specially Designated National, through a series of companies and associates attempted to earn over $3 million in proceeds from the sale of a California-based music studio,” said Acting Special Agent in Charge James E. Dennehy of the FBI. “Today’s forfeiture filing shows the FBI’s commitment to stopping individuals from obfuscating their activities to violate sanctions. The FBI will continue to enforce the national security laws of the United States and will ensure any violation of these laws and sanctions is punished accordingly.”

According to the court documents, on April 6, 2018 (the Designation Date), the U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) designated Oleg Deripaska as a Specially Designated National (SDN) in connection with its finding that the actions of the Government of the Russian Federation in Ukraine constitute an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States. Deripaska was sanctioned for his support of the Russian government and for his activity in the Russian energy sector. On or about the same date, OFAC also designated Basic Element Limited, EN+ Group and other entities for being owned or controlled by, directly or indirectly, Deripaska.

On Sept. 29, 2022, an indictment returned by a grand jury sitting in the Southern District of New York was unsealed, charging Deripaska and his associates Olga Shriki and Natalia Mikhaylovna Bardakova with a conspiracy to violate sanctions.

As alleged in the indictment, for over four years after Deripaska was sanctioned in 2018, and in violation of those sanctions, Deripaska paid Shriki to provide various services for his benefit in the United States. These services included the sale of a music studio in Burbank, California, in 2019, as well as hundreds of thousands of dollars’ worth of other services to aid in Deripaska’s efforts to have two of his children be born in the United States in 2020 and 2022, and to purchase goods for Deripaska from the United States.

Prior to his designation by OFAC, in or about 2008, Deripaska, through a series of shell companies, acquired the music studio for over $3 million. The direct owner of the studio was an entity named Ocean Studios California LLC, which held a bank account at Wells Fargo (the Ocean Studios Account).

Between in or about 2013 and in or about 2018, Shriki lived in the United States and worked for Deripaska’s entity Basic Element in its Manhattan office. Before and after the designation date, Shriki and Deripaska’s cousin Pavel Ezubov, among others, helped to operate and fund the music studio on behalf of Deripaska, and made clear that Deripaska was the ultimate decisionmaker with regard to the music studio.

In or about July 2018, approximately three months after OFAC designated Deripaska as an SDN, Shriki created a consulting business named Global Consulting Services LLC (GCS). Through GCS, Shriki coordinated with associates of Deripaska, including Ezubov and Bardakova, to continue providing services to and for the benefit of Deripaska and to continue receiving funds from Deripaska or entities controlled by Deripaska. GCS opened a bank account at a bank in Manhattan. Between August 2018 and September 2019, the GCS account received wires totaling over $500,000 from two entities associated with Deripaska, one of which entered into a separate agreement with an indicted co-conspirator to manage other Deripaska properties abroad after the designation date.

Beginning in July 2019, the Ocean Studios account received approximately $69,000 of transfers from Shriki’s GCS account, which in turn was funded by overseas accounts tied to Deripaska, as noted above.

In or about June 2019, Shriki effectuated a sale of the contents of the music studio for more than $500,000. In December 2019, more than a year after the designation date, while employed by Deripaska, Shriki assisted with the sale of the music studio by Ocean Studios California LLC in various ways, such as preparing the property for sale, coordinating with the accounting firm for the music studio, communicating with the real estate broker to approve the sale, facilitating the payment of outstanding taxes and bills for the music studio, signing over the property deed, and liquidating the other assets in the music studio. The music studio sale resulted in net proceeds of over $3 million, which were deposited in the Ocean Studios account.

During 2020, while Shriki was employed by Deripaska and continued to perform services for Deripaska, Shriki requested that an accounting firm transfer the proceeds from the sale of the music studio to a bank account in Russia in the name of a company that funded the music studio’s accounts after the designation date — or, in the alternative, requested that the accounting firm add Shriki as a signatory on the bank account for the music studio so that Shriki could effectuate the transfer of funds on behalf of the owner. The firm declined to effectuate the wire transfer itself.

In or about March 2021, Wells Fargo made the determination to block the Ocean Studios account and the funds on deposit due to Ocean Studios account’s relationship with Deripaska. The blocked funds subject to the complaint amount to approximately $3,435,676 plus accruing interest.

The FBI is investigating the case. The Department of Justice’s Office of International Affairs assisted in the investigation.

Assistant U.S. Attorney Vladislav Vainberg for the Southern District of New York is litigating the case.

On March 2, 2022, the Attorney General announced the launch of Task Force KleptoCapture, an interagency law enforcement task force dedicated to enforcing the sweeping sanctions, export restrictions, and economic countermeasures that, beginning in 2014, the U.S. has imposed, along with allies and partners, in response to Russia’s unprovoked military invasion of Ukraine. The Task Force will leverage all the Department’s tools and authorities against efforts to evade or undermine the economic actions taken by the U.S. government in response to Russian military aggression.

Gen Digital Pays $55.1M False Claims Act Judgment for Knowing Overcharges to General Services Administration After Government Prevails at Trial

Source: United States Department of Justice Criminal Division

Gen Digital Inc. (formerly known as Symantec Corp.), located in Tempe, Arizona, paid $55.1 million to satisfy a judgment, concluding a decade of False Claims Act litigation. The judgment required the company to pay $16.1 million in damages and $36.8 million in civil penalties, plus post-judgment interest and costs.

“The department will hold accountable contractors that knowingly overcharge the United States to enrich themselves,” said Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General Brian M. Boynton, head of the Justice Department’s Civil Division. “The years spent litigating this case and taking it to trial demonstrate the department’s steadfast commitment to protecting taxpayer funds.”

Following a four-week bench trial in February and March 2022, the trial court found Symantec liable for making knowing false claims to the United States when it mispresented its commercial sales practices during the negotiation and subsequent performance of a General Services Administration (GSA) contract. In particular, the court concluded that Symantec made false statements to GSA during contractual negotiations in 2006 and early-2007 and continued to falsely certify throughout the performance of the contract through Sept. 30, 2012, that its disclosures of its commercial sales practices were current, accurate and complete. The false disclosures induced GSA to accept and then continue to pay higher prices than it would have had it known of Symantec’s actual commercial pricing practices.

The court also found that Symantec continuously violated the Price Reduction Clause, a standard term in these types of Multiple Award Schedule contracts that requires the contractor throughout performance of the contract to maintain GSA’s price position in relation to an identified customer or category of customer agreed upon in contract negotiations. These violations deprived the United States of discounts to which it was entitled.

“The trial team secured a $55 million judgment that holds accountable a contractor who intentionally tried to overbill the government,” said U.S. Attorney Matthew M. Graves for the District of Columbia. “Because these schemes steal taxpayer dollars, the United States Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia will be steadfast in its efforts to bring fraudsters to justice no matter the complexity of the matter, pursuing them through trial, if necessary, to secure a just outcome.”

“The United States deserves fair prices and accurate information from GSA contractors,” said GSA Deputy Inspector General Robert C. Erickson. “This outcome is the result of hard work and dedication by a cross-functional team from the U.S. Department of Justice, GSA and GSA Office of Inspector General.”

Gen Digital’s payment ends a lawsuit filed under the qui tam or whistleblower provision of the False Claims Act, which permits private parties to file suit on behalf of the United States for false claims and share in a portion of the government’s recovery. The Act permits the United States to intervene and take over responsibility for litigating these cases, as the United States did here. The qui tam case is captioned United States ex rel. Morsell v. Symantec Corp., Civ. A. No. 12-0800 (DDC), and was brought by Lori Morsell, who administered the contract at issue for Symantec. Her share of the recovery has not yet been determined.

This successful litigation was a coordinated effort between the Civil Division’s Commercial Litigation Branch, Fraud Section, and the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia, with assistance from GSA’s Office of General Counsel and Office of Inspector General.

Senior Trial Counsel Daniel Schiffer and Trial Attorney F. Elias Boujaoude of the Justice Department’s Civil Division and Civil Chief Brian P. Hudak for the District of Columbia handled the matter.

Russian National Arrested for Attempting to Illegally Export Aircraft to Russia by Transshipping Through Armenia

Source: United States Department of Justice Criminal Division

Sergey Nechaev, a dual U.S.-Russian citizen, was arrested today in the Southern District of Georgia on charges related to the unlawful attempted export of two small aircraft to Russia. In conjunction with the arrest, the U.S. government also seized the aircraft.

According to the indictment, between March 3, 2023, and March 24, 2023, Nechaev engaged in a scheme to violate and evade U.S. export control laws and regulations by attempting to smuggle two Cessna aircraft from the United States to Russia by transshipping them through Armenia. Specifically, after the U.S. government imposed stricter controls on Russia in February 2022, Nechaev attempted to export a 1968 Cessna 172K and a 1973 Cessna, valued together at approximately $170,000, to a purported Russian flight school, without the required license or authorization from the Department of Commerce. To conceal the true end user and destination of the aircraft, Nechaev falsely represented that the end user and destination were in Armenia.

Nechaev is charged with attempting to export controlled goods without a license in violation of the Export Control Reform Act (ECRA), smuggling goods contrary to U.S. law, and causing the submission of false and misleading information in Electronic Export Information paperwork submitted through the Automated Export System. If convicted, Nechaev faces a maximum penalty of 20 years in prison for the unlawful attempted export of controlled goods; up to 10 years in prison for smuggling; and up to five years in prison for falsifying export information. The aircraft will also be subject to forfeiture as property involved in the commission of the crime. A federal district court judge will determine any sentence after considering the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines and other statutory factors.

The U.S. Department of Commerce’s Office of Export Enforcement, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security’s Homeland Security Investigations, the U.S. Customs and Border Protection, and the Federal Aviation Administration are investigating the case.

Assistant U.S. Attorneys Darron Hubbard and L. Alexander Hamner for the Southern District of Georgia and Trial Attorneys Leslie Esbrook and Fatema Merchant of the National Security Division’s Counterintelligence and Export Control Section are prosecuting the case.

The investigation was coordinated through the Justice Department’s Task Force KleptoCapture, an interagency law enforcement task force dedicated to enforcing the sweeping sanctions, export controls and economic countermeasures that, beginning in 2014, the United States, along with its foreign allies and partners, has imposed in response to Russia’s unprovoked military invasion of Ukraine. Announced by the Attorney General on March 2, 2022, and under the leadership of the Office of the Deputy Attorney General, the task force will continue to leverage all of the department’s tools and authorities to combat efforts to evade or undermine the collective actions taken by the U.S. government in response to Russian military aggression.

An indictment is merely an allegation. All defendants are presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law.