Justice Department Secures Agreement with San Luis Obispo County, California, to Resolve Claims that Conditions in the County Jail Violate Federal Laws

Source: United States Department of Justice

The Justice Department announced today that the department has reached an agreement with San Luis Obispo County, California, resolving the department’s findings that the conditions of confinement at the San Luis Obispo County Jail (the jail) violate the Eighth and 14th Amendments to the U.S. Constitution and the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). The agreement recognizes and outlines the significant strides the county has made in some areas since the findings were issued.

“We are encouraged by the improvements the San Luis Obispo County Jail has made since we announced our investigation, but there is still more that must be done to achieve constitutional compliance,” said Assistant Attorney General Kristen Clarke of the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division. “This agreement includes strong remedial provisions that, if fully implemented, should improve suicide prevention, reduce excessive force and reduce the use of unnecessary isolation.”       

“Safeguarding civil rights is core to American values,” said U.S. Attorney Martin Estrada for the Central District of California.  “We are pleased that — with the cooperation of San Luis Obispo County — we have achieved a comprehensive agreement that will protect the safety and civil rights of people incarcerated at the county’s jail. Under this agreement, the county must implement reforms in suicide prevention, restrictive housing, use of force and quality assurance. My office is committed to protecting the civil rights of everyone in our district.”

Under the agreement, the jail will, among other things:

  • Take steps to protect incarcerated people at risk of suicide;
  • Stop housing people with serious mental illness in isolation absent specific and significant protections;
  • Require any use of force by staff comply with constitutional standards; and
  • Implement a quality assurance program to identify and correct systemic deficiencies.

The agreement also requires the appointment of a lead expert to assess the county’s compliance with the agreement and provide technical assistance and recommendations to facilitate compliance. The lead expert will issue public reports every six months on the county’s compliance with the agreement.

The Justice Department initiated its investigation of the San Luis Obispo Jail in October 2018 under the Civil Rights of Institutionalized Persons Act (CRIPA) and the ADA. The department provided San Luis Obispo County written notice in August 2021 of its findings, along with the supporting facts for its findings, and the minimum remedial measures necessary to address the violations found.

The Civil Rights Division continues to prioritize unconstitutional conditions and violations of federal law in correctional and juvenile justice facilities. It opened new investigations into prisons and jails in TennesseeCalifornia, South Carolina, and juvenile justice facilities across Kentucky. The division also issued findings in its investigations of Mississippi prisonsTexas juvenile justice system’s facilities, the Alvin S. Glenn Detention Center in Columbia, South Carolina, and the Georgia Department of Corrections. The division entered into agreements, including consent decrees, regarding the Fulton County, Georgia, Jail, the Cumberland County, New Jersey, Jail, the Edna Mahan Correctional Facility for Women in New Jersey, the Broad River Road Complex in South Carolina, the Manson Youth Institution in Connecticut, and the Massachusetts Department of Correction. The division is also litigating matters related to the constitutionality of conditions in Alabama’s prisons for men and the incarceration of people beyond their release dates in Louisiana prisons.         

Additional information about the Civil Rights Division of the Justice Department is available on its website at www.justice.gov/crt.

Individuals in the seven counties of the Central District of California may file a complaint asserting civil rights violations with the Civil Rights Section, Civil Division of the U.S. Attorney’s Office by completing and submitting this form (English) (Spanish) by email to USACAC.CV-CivilRights@usdoj.gov.

Defense News: SECNAV Del Toro Names Future Medium Landing Ship LSM 1

Source: United States Navy

Secretary of the Navy Carlos Del Toro announced Jan. 16, USS McClung (LSM 1) as the name for the first ship in the new McClung-class of medium landing ships.

“The Landing Ship Medium (LSM) will be an asset to the Marine Corps’ amphibious capabilities, designed to greatly enhance operational flexibility and combat readiness,” said Del Toro. “I am honored to name the first ship in this class after Major McClung, a selfless leader and hero who embodied the highest ideals of service, honor, and loyalty to our nation.”

Honors U.S. Naval Academy graduate and Public Affairs Officer Major Megan M.L. McClung, USMC, who was killed in action while serving in Iraq. This will be the first Navy vessel to bear her name.  

“When the McClung family spoke with Secretary of the Navy, Carlos Del Toro, and learned of his intent to name a ship for Megan, our emotions ran high. In our discussion, Secretary Del Toro shared the support of General Eric Smith, Commandant of the Marine Corps, in the naming selection, he spoke of Megan’s commitment to the Navy and Marine Corps. Our family is incredibly honored that Megan’s service to her country is being honored in this way,” said Mike McClung. “Megan lived a life of bringing the stories of mission and brave commitment to the world but never needed to be that story.  As a family we sometimes discuss how Megan would have felt being the center of that story, but we know that she would have found the greater story she has become a part of. With this great honor of naming this ship after her, Megan would remind us all that the greatest duty of this ship is to get others to their story, and to Be Bold, Be Brief, and Be Gone. The United States Navy again remembers Megan today and this ship and all who serve on it, will continue to tell her story as they bravely create their own legacy.”

Commissioned in 1995 after graduation from the United States Naval Academy (USNA), McClung served on active duty until 2004 when she joined the Marine Corps Reserve. Recalled to active duty in 2005, McClung deployed to Al Anbar Province, Iraq, as the media relations officer for I Marine Expeditionary Force (Forward). 

On 6 December 2006, she was killed alongside two U.S. Army Soldiers, Captain Travis Patriquin and Specialist Vincent Pomante III, by a roadside improvised explosive device in Ramadi.  McClung was the first female Marine officer to be killed in the Iraq war and the first female graduate of the USNA to be killed in the line of duty. 

In 2007, the broadcast studio at Camp Victory, Iraq, was named in her honor. The Defense Information School (DINFOS) presents a leadership award in her name to one graduating member of the Public Affairs & Communication Strategy Qualification Course. She was inducted into the DINFOS Hall of Fame in 2024.  The Marine Corps presents the Major Megan McClung Leadership Award, in recognition of the recipients’ leadership skills and their contributions towards the tenets of equal opportunity, human relations, and public service, annually at the Joint Women’s Leadership Symposium. Major McClung is buried at Arlington National Cemetery.

Along with announcing the ship’s name, Secretary Del Toro announced the sponsors for the future USS McClung (LSM 1) will be her mother, Dr. Re McClung and her niece, Gabrielle McClung. They, in their role as the ship’s sponsor will represent a lifelong relation

ship with the ship and crew.
The Navy’s Medium Landing Ship (LSM) program, previously called the Light Amphibious Warship (LAW) program, envisions procuring a class of 18 to 35 new amphibious ships to support the Marine Corps, particularly in implementing a new Marine Corps operational concept called Expeditionary Advanced Base Operations (EABO).

Mechanized and utility landing craft are rugged, steel displacement vessels used by amphibious forces to transport equipment and troops from ship to the shore, along the shore, and from shore back to the amphibious warships. Landing craft are also used to support civilian humanitarian/maritime operations.

More information on our medium landing ships can be found here.  

Justice Department Secures Agreement with DoubleTree by Hilton Hotel Orlando at SeaWorld to Resolve Allegations of Discriminatory Policy Against Hosting Arabs

Source: United States Department of Justice Criminal Division

The Justice Department announced today that it has reached an agreement with AWH Orlando Property LLC, the owner of the DoubleTree by Hilton Hotel Orlando at SeaWorld in Florida (DoubleTree), to resolve allegations that the DoubleTree discriminated against people of Arab descent in violation of Title II of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title II). Title II prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion or national origin in places of public accommodation, including hotels.

The lawsuit filed in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida alleges that the DoubleTree adopted and implemented a discriminatory policy against hosting guests of Arab descent by unilaterally canceling a conference that was to be held by the Arab America Foundation, a non-profit educational and cultural organization, in November 2023, a week before the conference was scheduled to begin.

“No one may be denied the right to use hotel facilities because of their national origin,” said Assistant Attorney General Kristen Clarke of the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division. “The Justice Department is committed to protecting the rights of all people to be free from discrimination in hotels and other public accommodations around the country.”

“The right to enjoy and have equal access to places of public accommodation is essential in our communities,” said U.S. Attorney Roger B. Handberg for the Middle District of Florida. “The U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Middle District will continue to hold places of public accommodation accountable to ensure that the civil rights of all people are protected.”

The lawsuit alleges that the DoubleTree’s decision to cancel the Arab America Foundation’s conference was not predicated on any legitimate, non-discriminatory reasons. Although the hotel claimed that the cancelation was because of security concerns, the hotel faced no security threats or risks associated with the conference. Indeed, as alleged in the department’s complaint, contrary to representations that the DoubleTree made to the Arab America Foundation, the DoubleTree had not received any calls or other communications raising a safety or security threat to the conference or to the hotel. Rather, the decision to cancel was based on the national origin of the Arab America Foundation’s members and the conference attendees. The complaint therefore alleges that the DoubleTree discriminated on the basis of national origin and denied people of Arab descent the full and equal enjoyment of access to the services, accommodations, and privileges at the hotel.

The settlement, in the form of a consent decree that must still be approved by the court, requires the DoubleTree to:

  • Issue a statement to the Arab America Foundation that all guests and groups are welcome to the hotel, including Arab and Arab American guests and groups;
  • Retain a qualified compliance officer to oversee compliance with the consent decree for two years;
  • Notify employees and executives of the DoubleTree’s obligations under Title II and the consent decree, including DoubleTree’s commitment to ensuring equal access to the hotel, regardless of race, color, religion or national origin;
  • Establish a written anti-discrimination policy, which includes a system of accepting, investigating and responding to guest complaints of discrimination;
  • Conduct outreach to Arab or Arab American groups to share promotional materials about the hotel and indicate that it is open to all members of the public;
  • Provide training to employees and executives on Title II and the DoubleTree’s obligations under the consent decree; and
  • Make regular reports to the department to demonstrate its compliance with the consent decree.

Under Title II, the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division can obtain injunctive relief that changes policies and practices to remedy the discriminatory conduct. Title II does not authorize the division to obtain monetary damages for customers who are victims of discrimination.

More information about the Civil Rights Division and the laws it enforces is available at www.justice.gov/crt. Individuals may report discrimination in places of public accommodation that violates Title II by calling the Justice Department at 1-833-591-0291, or submitting a report online.

Attorney General Merrick B. Garland Delivers Farewell Address

Source: United States Department of Justice Criminal Division

Remarks as Delivered

Thank you, Lisa. There is no one I would rather have worked with day in and day out to lead this Department. The American people could not have asked for a better Deputy Attorney General to serve our country at this important time.

And thank you, Chris, Elizabeth, Vanita, and Jolene, for your kind words, and for your extraordinary service to the Department and the American people.

To my family — you well know I would not be here today without your support.

Four years ago, when I returned to the Justice Department for the fifth time, I told you that it felt like coming home. And I meant it.

I had first set foot in the Department more than four decades before — the grandson of immigrants, looking for work that would give me the chance to pay this country back for protecting them.

And I found it.

I found it in the company of dedicated men and women who start each day committed to doing nothing more or less than what is right.

Not what is politically expedient.

Not what is easiest, or most comfortable.

But what is right.

After that first tour, my career took a few detours. But I had the great good fortune to return to this Department again and again and again.

I had the opportunity to see it at every level — as a young special assistant, as an Assistant U.S. Attorney, as a supervisor in the Criminal Division, and as the Principal Associate Deputy Attorney General.

So, when I came back to the Department as Attorney General four years ago, I really did not think it possible that my respect and admiration for the people who work here could be any greater.

But it is.

I am simply in awe of what the public servants of this Department — across the country and around the world — have done over the past four years to fulfill our mission to keep our country safe, to protect civil rights, and to uphold the rule of law.

I am grateful beyond words to each of you. So, I will just say thank you. Thank you for the communities you have made safer; the threats you have disrupted; the people whose civil rights you have defended; the consumers and workers you have protected.

Thank you for the way you have done that work — with integrity, skill, and compassion.

And thank you for ensuring the Justice Department’s adherence to the rule of law in everything you do.

Each of us who comes to work at this Department begins our period of service with an oath. It is an oath that I have taken many times in my career, and an oath that I have administered to others many more times.

We swear that we will support and defend the Constitution of the United States and that we will bear true faith and allegiance to the same.

But bearing true faith and allegiance to the Constitution is not the end of our obligation. It is just the beginning.

It is just the beginning because, as Attorney General Robert Jackson warned in this very hall 85 years ago, the same powers that enable the federal prosecutor to pursue justice also create the potential for grave injustice.

Although our Constitution and laws include important constraints on law enforcement, they nonetheless grant law enforcement considerable discretion to determine when, whom, how, and even whether to investigate or prosecute for apparent violations of federal criminal law.

To ensure fairness in the administration of justice, we must temper this grant of discretion with a set of principles that ensure we exercise our authority in a just fashion.

We must understand that there is a difference between what we can do — and what we should do.

That is where our norms come in.

Developed in the wake of the Watergate scandal, and formalized over almost half a century, those norms are our commitment to constrain our own discretion – so that our agents will begin investigations only when there is proper predication; and so that our prosecutors will bring charges only when we conclude that a jury will convict beyond a reasonable doubt and that the conviction will be upheld on appeal.

In short, that we will make our law enforcement decisions based only on the facts and the law.

Our norms are a promise to treat like cases alike — that we will not have one rule for the powerful and another for the powerless, one rule for friends and another for foes.

They are a promise to ensure respect for the integrity of our career agents, lawyers, and staff, who are the institutional backbone and the historical memory of this Department.

They are a promise to ensure protections for journalists in law enforcement [investigations], because a free press is essential to our democracy.

Those norms include our commitment to guaranteeing the independence of the Justice Department from both the White House and the Congress concerning law enforcement investigations and prosecutions.

We make that commitment not because independence is necessarily constitutionally required, but because it is the only way to ensure that our law enforcement decisions are free from partisan influence.

We know that only an independent Justice Department can protect the safety and civil rights of everyone in our country.

And we know that only an independent Justice Department can ensure that the facts and law alone will determine whether a person is investigated or prosecuted.

Those norms have been woven into the DNA of generations of DOJ employees, career and noncareer alike.

They are the commitments that ensure we will adhere not only to the letter of the law, but to the rule of law.

It is the obligation of each of us to follow our norms not only when it is easy, but also when it is hard — especially when it is hard.

It is the obligation of each of us to adhere to our norms even when — and especially when — the circumstances we face are not normal.

And it is the obligation of the Attorney General to insist on those norms as the principles upon which this Department operates.

It is the obligation of the Attorney General to make clear that the only way for the Justice Department to do the right thing is to do it the right way. That unjust means cannot achieve just ends.

The Attorney General must ensure that this Department seeks justice, only with justice.

And, critically, it is the obligation of the Attorney General to understand that the Attorney General is only a temporary steward of this Department, and that its heart and soul is its career workforce.

The Attorney General must not just lead this Department’s workforce, but must respect it, and when necessary, defend it.

It is the responsibility of every employee at the Justice Department to do what is right. And it is the obligation of the Attorney General to have their backs when they do.

That is what you have done. And that is the kind of Attorney General I have tried to be.

On my first day back at the Justice Department four years ago, I said that working here is more than a job. It is a calling.

I said that those of us who come to work here are united by our commitment to the rule of law and to seeking equal justice under law.

We are united by our commitment to protecting our country, as our oath says, “from all enemies foreign and domestic.”

And we are united by our commitment to enforcing our country’s laws and to ensuring the civil rights and civil liberties of our people.

I also said that these would be the principles that would guide us, not only in word but also in deed.

I am grateful to each of you for the work you have done over the last four years to fulfill that promise.

Today, communities across the country are safer because of you:

Because you worked shoulder-to-shoulder with local law enforcement officers, and with the communities they serve, to dramatically turn the tide against the violent crime that spiked during the pandemic.

Because you answered the call when families who lost loved ones to fentanyl poisoning were seeking justice, and when local police departments were seeking help to confront the deadliest drug threat our country has ever faced.

Because you disrupted threats from foreign and domestic terrorists, and from authoritarian regimes, that threatened our country’s security.

You made the lives of people across the country better because you challenged anticompetitive agreements and unlawful monopolies; because you safeguarded taxpayers and citizens from fraud and public corruption; and because you protected neighborhoods harmed by environmental degradation.

You secured historic financial penalties against corporations that violated the law. And you made clear to corporate executives that they do not operate outside of the bounds of the law.

You worked tirelessly to fulfill the Justice Department’s founding purpose to protect civil rights.

You confronted the discrimination in lending and housing that harms families for generations; the discrimination in schools that deprives students of educational opportunities; and the discrimination in the workplace that stifles economic opportunity.

You stood up for the right of every citizen to vote and to have that vote counted.

You stood up for the right of women to access lawful and life-saving reproductive care.

You made clear to communities victimized by hate crimes that they do not stand alone — that the United States Department of Justice stands with them.

You protected our country’s democratic institutions from violence and threats of violence. You charged more than 1,500 people for criminal conduct that occurred during the January 6 attack on the Capitol, as well as in the days and weeks leading up to that attack.

You brought to justice those who kicked, punched, beat, and tased law enforcement officers who were protecting the Capitol that day.

And you pursued accountability for that attack on our democracy wherever it led — guided only by your commitment to follow the facts and the law.

I am proud of the work you have done.

I am equally proud of the way you have done that work.

I am proud that when I visited you in communities across the country, I saw not only the skill with which you have done your work, but the depth of your compassion.

In Uvalde, I saw how you truly honored the lives of the 19 children and two teachers who were taken from their loved ones.

In Pittsburgh, even after the Tree of Life trial was over and it felt like the rest of the world had moved on, I saw you sit with family members of victims of that attack and listen to them talk about the people they lost.

In Louisville, in Minneapolis, and in Memphis, I saw the care you took in approaching families and communities mourning loved ones killed by those sworn to protect them.

I saw your commitment to pursuing justice in honor of Breonna Taylor, George Floyd, and Tyre Nichols. I saw your commitment to working with both local law enforcement and the community to enact long-term, systemic reforms.

In Charlotte, after Deputy U.S. Marshal Tommy Weeks and three other officers were shot and killed while apprehending a fugitive, I saw you come together to support their loved ones. I saw the U.S. Marshals family show up — through their own grief — to be there for each other.

And in Tommy’s wife, Kelly, I saw that too often unseen, unimaginable strength of the families of law enforcement officers.

I know that this barely scratches the surface of the work you have done.

It does not capture the hours you have spent away from family, the long days and nights, weekends, and holidays you have spent working.

It does not capture the enormous risks you have taken and the dangers you have faced while doing your jobs.

But for all of this work — and for so much more, I thank you.

I am so proud of you.

I know that you do not do this work for public recognition — you do this work because you are public servants.

But I also know that a lot has been said about this Department by people outside of it — about what your job is, and what it is not, and about why you do your work the way you do it.

I know that, over the years, some have criticized the Department, saying that it has allowed politics to influence its decision-making. That criticism often comes from people with political views opposite from one another, each making the exact opposite points about the same set of facts.

I know that you have faced unfounded attacks simply for doing your jobs, at the very same time you have risked your lives to protect our country from a range of foreign and domestic threats.

But the story that has been told by some outside of this building about what has happened inside of it is wrong.

You have worked to pursue justice — not politics.

That is the truth.

And nothing can change it.

I know that a lot is being asked of you right now.

All I ask of you is to remember who you are, and why you came to work here in the first place.

You are public servants and patriots who swore an oath to support and defend the Constitution.

You are professionals of the utmost integrity who are worthy of the trust of the American people.

Your job is to do what is right, nothing more and nothing less.

More than 40 years after I first entered this building, it is now time to say goodbye.

It will be hard to leave these hallowed halls.

It will be hard to leave the leadership team that has guided the Department with such extraordinary skill, integrity, and 24/7 dedication: Lisa, Ben, and Vanita before him; all of our component heads; the leaders of our law enforcement agencies; our U.S. Attorneys; and my long-suffering staff.

It will be even harder to leave the career workforce, who have been my colleagues, my mentors, and my friends over so many years.

But it will be hardest to leave this job — where every day is another opportunity to uphold the rule of law, to keep my fellow citizens safe, and to protect civil rights.

I will miss it. I will miss all of you.

I could not be more honored than to have served alongside you as Attorney General.

Deputy Attorney General Lisa Monaco Delivers Remarks at Attorney General Garland’s Farewell Event

Source: United States Department of Justice Criminal Division

Remarks as Prepared for Delivery

Thank you, Jolene.

Now, before I introduce the man of the hour, I want to add a few of my own reflections.

And I’m going to start with a little myth-busting.

By now we know the arc of his career: brilliant young lawyer, advisor to Ben Civilletti; Assistant U.S. Attorney; Criminal Division leader, PADAG overseeing the Oklahoma City Bombing case; a brilliant jurist on the D.C. Circuit; and an Attorney General with a tendency to choke up when speaking about his reverence for this place and its people.  

All that seriousness of purpose obscures the lighter side.

The man who revels in the truly awful pun.

Who thinks he has musical talents — talents that amount to banging on a cow bell — as rhythm eludes him – in support of the Criminal Division cover band.

The man who’s an unabashed Swiftie — with the friendship bracelets to prove it.

And who I have witnessed being positively giddy in the presence of Bruce Springsteen & the E Street Band.

I share this not to expose some insider secrets in the waning days of an otherwise very buttoned up tenure — but to fill out the picture of the man who has led this Department for the last four years.

Nearly every morning for those past four years, we’ve convened to discuss the work of this Department — and we’ve done so under the watchful gaze of prior Attorneys General.

Those among you who are veterans of DOJ know the tradition — the Attorney General chooses which portraits of past AGs will hang in the current AG’s conference room.

In my experience, those choices, say a lot about an Attorney General.

In characteristic fashion, the four portraits hanging upstairs today reflect choices that are deliberate, thoughtful, and rooted in the principles that guide the Justice Department.

And they tell you a lot about this Attorney General:

Robert Jackson — Supreme Court Justice, Nuremberg Prosecutor, and Attorney General who literally wrote the book on being a federal prosecutor.

Robert Kennedy — this building’s namesake and civil rights champion.

Elliot Richardson — who stood up to immense pressure to uphold the rule of law at a time of testing for this building and its values.

The fourth portrait that hangs in the northwest corner of the room, nearest the Attorney General’s own office — is that of Edward Levi.

Another brilliant lawyer from Chicago — called to public service in the wake of Watergate — when the norms and traditions of this place and rule of law itself was strained to the point of breaking.

As most here know, Levi went on to put in place the norms that form our North Star today.

Little did he know then that the Department would once again need another deep-thinking, detail-oriented Chicagoan — to quote Levi — “enforce the laws at a time when the very nature of law and its enforcement have been called into question…”

The AG and I both invoked Ed Levi when we were nominated four years ago.

It’s no surprise we reached for that touchstone because we both basically grew up in the Department — albeit a few years apart.

We both served as young counsels to the Attorney General — he for Ben Civiletti, me for Janet Reno.

We both went on to be AUSAs here in D.C. — a job we describe as the best there is — because the job description is to do the right thing.

We both served as PADAG – the hardest job in the Department.

In fact, when I became PADAG in 2010, the first person I sought out for advice was then-Judge Garland.

He may not remember this, but I’ll never forget that lunch in the judge’s dining room at the Court.

I was lamenting that DOJ was coming under fire from all sides for something — he leaned back, and calmly and wisely said — everyone always feels that way when you’re in it, but it’s not that big a deal, and it’s never actually as bad as it feels when you’re getting criticized in the moment.

Attorney General — care to revise those remarks?

I first learned what it means to be a lawyer in public service in this Department, and for the past four years I’ve had a front row seat to a master class from this Attorney General.

From this seat I’ve seen an AG who set a clear mission from day one: to uphold the rule of law, keep the country safe, and protect civil rights.

Who starts and ends every day making sure we are asking the right questions: what’s the law; what’s the right thing to do; and what’s right for the Department and its people.

I’ve seen an Attorney General who loves nothing more than digging into a case briefing with agents and prosecutors.

And who has focused this institution on standing up for those agents and prosecutors who have come under threat simply for doing their job.

I’ve seen an Attorney General who made sure this Department was once again pursuing justice for victims of war crimes — not just as a prosecutor — but as someone who feels a profound responsibility to give back to this country.

I’ve seen an Attorney General who made clear from the very first days of his tenure that this Justice Department would pursue accountability for those who attacked our democracy — no matter where — or to whom — that investigation led.

And I’ve seen an Attorney General who has grieved — too often – with the families of the fallen.

The Attorney General and I both worked at different times for Janet Reno; she also hung Ed Levi’s portrait in her conference room.

She did so, I believe, to remind us that we are all custodians of this place — for however long we have the privilege to serve.

Merrick, as you reminded us four years ago — the Department’s founding task — from then President Grant, in the shadow of Reconstruction, was to hold accountable those who sought to undermine democracy.

You reminded us then that every generation has a responsibility to reaffirm our commitment to the norms that guide this place.

You pledged to do so — and you did.

If history is a guide, this Department will face tests in the future.

Thanks to your service and your stewardship, the career men and women of this great institution — who are its beating heart — will carry forward the principles this Department stands for and will continue to do even-handed justice.

Mr. Attorney General, I speak for all of us when I say it’s been an honor to serve alongside you.

With that, it is my honor to introduce the 86th Attorney General of the United States: Merrick B. Garland.