Sextortion

Source: Federal Bureau of Investigation FBI Crime News

Presley’s mother said her daughter called at her first opportunity to break the phone connection with the predator. Testani wanted to take over one of her social media accounts so he could use it to contact her friends, giving him the ability to deceive and exploit another group of young girls. But as he took over her existing account, he needed her to create a new one for herself so they would still be connected online.

As she was carrying out that demand, Presley had a chance to call for help. “He told her she had two minutes to get it done,” her mother said. “When they broke that connection, she felt she could call me.”

Presley’s mother and stepfather raced home. And although they were confused about what was happening, they couldn’t mistake the terror in Presley’s voice. Her stepfather reached her first and immediately called the police when he saw what was happening on her phone.

Presley’s bravery in reporting helped investigators find the man who terrorized her. Testani pleaded guilty to child sexual exploitation in February and was sentenced to 60 years in federal prison on August 6, 2020.

Special Agent Kevin Kaufman, who investigated the case for the FBI in Tampa with local law enforcement, said that they identified several other victims across the country—some as young as 10 years old.

The investigation showed that Testani obtained the login information for other victims’ social media accounts, which allowed him to message hundreds of other young people.

The length of Testani’s sentence reflects the number of children he hurt, the extreme nature of his crimes, and the devastating effects this type of sexual violence has on its victims. Presley’s mother said her daughter is still dealing with depression and anxiety, has trouble concentrating in school, and experiences panic attacks.

The fact that Presley never met Testani in person and never even saw his face only amplified her fear. This man who hurt her could be anyone, anywhere. “That’s why she went from a social butterfly to absolutely terrified to leave the house,” her mother said.

New Top Ten Fugitive

Source: Federal Bureau of Investigation FBI Crime News

Jose Rodolfo Villarreal-Hernandez, wanted for allegedly directing his associates to track and murder a man in Southlake, Texas, has been added to the FBI’s Ten Most Wanted Fugitives list. The Department of State’s Transnational Organized Crime Rewards Program is offering a reward of up to $1 million for information leading directly to his arrest.

Villarreal-Hernandez, also known as “El Gato,” is believed to hold an active leadership position in the Beltran Leyva Drug Trafficking Organization within the region of San Pedro Garza Garcia, Nuevo Leon, Mexico. He is also believed to be responsible for numerous murders in Mexico.

The victim of the Texas murder, 43, was shot while sitting in the passenger seat of his vehicle outside an upscale shopping center in a Dallas-Fort Worth suburb on May 22, 2013. His wife was standing near the driver’s side door when her husband was killed. And the brazen ambush occurred in the early evening hours, while the center was full of shoppers.

According to evidence and testimony gathered in the trials of those accused of tracking and killing the man, Villarreal-Hernandez ordered and financed a multi-year effort to find and watch the victim and then kill him. Investigators believe Villarreal-Hernandez had a long-standing personal grudge against the victim.

Select image to view wanted poster

Train Derailment Mystery

Source: Federal Bureau of Investigation FBI Crime News

Michael Lum was a student at Arizona State University when he learned that a train had mysteriously derailed in rural Arizona on October 9, 1995.

“I woke up and saw it on the news, and I went to class and we talked about it,” Lum recalled.

Twenty-five years later, Lum, a special agent in the Federal Protective Service, is on an FBI task force working to find anyone responsible for the derailment that killed the train conductor and injured dozens more. No one has been arrested, but the FBI continues to investigate.

Amtrak’s Sunset Limited was traveling from El Paso to Los Angeles when, while crossing a bridge, it ran over an altered track in a rural area 70 miles outside of Phoenix. Around 1:35 a.m., the train slowed down as it crossed the track, but momentum and the train’s weight sent it careening into a ravine, Lum said.

The conductor was thrown from the train and died. Of the 258 passengers on the train, 12 had serious injuries, and about 100 had minor injuries.

“There were young children and elderly people on board. Some of the victims said this really ruined their lives—they had PTSD, serious injuries,” Lum said. “These victims were deeply affected.”

The crash site was so rural that investigators and rescuers had a challenging time even reaching the passengers. Makeshift roads were built to get rescuers in and out of the area. And in an era before cell phones and GPS were common, rescue teams formed convoys so they wouldn’t get lost trying to find the victims.

Investigators at the scene at the time found a note claiming responsibility and expressing anti-government sentiment. But investigators have not yet found those responsible.

“This was just six months after the Oklahoma City bombing, it was fresh on everyone’s minds. People were on edge,” Lum said.

The passage of 25 years has not dampened the investigators’ resolve to find the truth. The public regularly calls with tips.

“We’re reexamining evidence with new technology, and the public continues to provide leads that we’re tracking down,” he said.

Lum emphasized that the investigative team is committed to getting justice for the victims, especially the family of the conductor who lost his life.

“The crew and passengers were just innocent people going about their lives. They were minding their own business, sleeping in the middle of the night,” Lum said. “We want to make sure anyone responsible has to answer for this crime.”

Remembering Investigative Specialist Saul Tocker

Source: Federal Bureau of Investigation FBI Crime News

Remarks prepared for delivery.

On behalf of the entire FBI, it’s an honor to be here today to remember Saul.

Saul joined the Bureau in 1990, serving first as a security warder and then as a police officer at FBI Headquarters before joining the Washington Field Office’s Special Surveillance Group, SSG, in 1995. He served the bulk of his career there, most recently as a team coordinator and supervisory investigative specialist.

On September 11, when an all-hands call went out for assistance after the Pentagon was attacked, Saul didn’t hesitate to respond. He didn’t have to go, but he wanted to help. On 12-hour shifts, day in and day out, he sifted through debris.

Everyone at the FBI had one goal in mind on that tragic day: to make sure that nothing like that ever happened again. Saul shared that same sense of resolve.

And throughout Saul’s illness, even in its darkest days, he carried that same resolve with him. Resolve to be there for his family for as long as he could. To push forward with the utmost optimism.

In the past few years we have really begun to understand—and to witness—the long-term effects of the FBI’s work after 9/11 and the full extent of the sacrifices that our first responders made. We’ve lost far too many members of the FBI family due to 9/11-related illnesses. And we’re by no means alone. Our brothers and sisters in law enforcement, firefighting, and first response have also suffered devastating losses—and we all fear there are more to come.

So as we gather here today, we remember these selfless men and women, like Saul. And we take inspiration from their example and the sacrifices they heroically made for all of us.

I was fortunate to have a conversation with Saul in October. I was struck by how much he didn’t want to talk about himself, but about the others he was grateful for.

How much he’d loved the SSG mission, and how important it was that the younger folks learned to carry out that mission the right way.

How glad he was to have been part of something bigger than himself.

How grateful he was to the folks of our Human Resources Division for working to help victims of 9/11-related illnesses and their families.

How moved he was by the outpouring of support he and his family had experienced from his many colleagues.

And in talking to the people who knew Saul well, it’s clear they all felt incredibly lucky to call him a friend.

And for many of you in the FBI, he didn’t go by Saul; he went by “Seahawk”—a nickname that came easily at work because he was one of “the 12,” as the diehard Seattle Seahawks fans are known. The loudest, proudest fans in professional football. So loud, even, that they’ve been known to set off minor earthquakes.

It sounds like Saul—who even decorated for the holidays with a Seahawks-themed Christmas tree—would have fit right in at Lumen Field.

“Seahawk” was a big presence. A bear of a man. A guy who was very proud of handily completing the “Quaker Steak & Lube Triple Atomic Wings Challenge” with the t-shirt to prove it.

His teammates always found it amusing to watch that big, burly guy fold himself into the lotus position to climb into one of the smaller Bureau cars, like a tiny black Mustang.

Saul had warm laugh and a wicked sense of humor. He was quick-witted and clever. And had a big, megawatt smile—so much so that I’ve been told a lot of people doubted his teeth were even real.

Saul understood and valued the importance of teamwork and community. He was instrumental in bringing people together—not just at work, but at home, too. He was at the center of a very close-knit neighborhood.

By all accounts, the members of the Bureau’s SSG teams share a bond that is nothing short of incredible. I’ve heard that time and again. They become a type of family within the FBI family, and Saul’s SSG family was as close as they come.

His teammates said they could always rely on him for help. If you needed anything, if you were struggling, if you just needed to talk—Saul could put aside the burly, brusque, sarcastic Seahawk. He would really listen to you, and you could trust him.

He could be your biggest critic—always in the interest of helping you—and your staunchest ally.

To paraphrase an old saying, he had a way of telling someone to go to hell and have them look forward to the trip—or not.

His Bureau travels took him all across the country, from the Florida Keys to the tiny town of Manly, Alaska. And I have to believe those Bureau trips had an extra special meaning to Saul. In talking with his wife, Laurice, just last week, I learned that she was previously a travel agent for the Bureau. In fact, that’s how they met.

But of all Saul’s travels, his favorite were his trips to the Outer Banks, where he’d rent a huge house with as many family and friends as possible. That time together—especially with Laurice, and his kids, Zac and Rachel—meant the world to him. And I’m sure times like those are the memories so many of you hold dear.

There’s a beautiful Jewish poem about remembering those we’ve lost:

In the rising of the sun and in its going down,
we remember them.

In the blowing of the wind and in the chill of winter,
we remember them.

In the opening of buds and in the rebirth of spring,
we remember them.

In the blueness of the sky and in the warmth of summer,
we remember them.

In the rustling of leaves and in the beauty of autumn,
we remember them.

In the beginning of the year and when it ends,
we remember them.

When we are weary and in need of strength,
we remember them.

When we are lost and sick at heart,
we remember them.

When we have joys we yearn to share,
we remember them.

So long as we live, they too shall live, for they are now a part of us, as we remember them.

Today, we say goodbye to a beloved member of the FBI family gone too soon. But we’ll remember him, in ways big and small, from the sunrise to the rustling of the leaves. We’ll remember his laugh. His quick wit. His big smile. We’ll remember how good it felt to call him a colleague and a friend.

Laurice, Zac, and Rachel: We know you’ll remember him better than anyone. You’ll remember him as a devoted husband and a phenomenal father. We all thank you for sharing Saul with us for so many years. Please know that you, too, will always be part of the FBI family.

May your father’s memory be a blessing.

Keeping Our Economy, Our Citizens, and Our Companies Safe, Secure, and Confident in a Digitally Connected World

Source: Federal Bureau of Investigation FBI Crime News

Washington, D.C.

Remarks prepared for delivery.

Thank you, Peter. I do wish we could be together in person, but COVID has of course forced us all to find new ways of getting together. And new ways of doing business. And we’re not alone. It turns out, unfortunately, that the pandemic has led criminals to new and creative ways of doing business, too.

I’d like to talk to you today about some of the top financial crime threats and trends we’re seeing at the FBI, what we’re doing to counter those threats and stop those trends. I’ll also share some thoughts about what all this means for banks.

Let’s start with a prototypical fraud example from this past year. It’s one you may have heard of: As most of you know, the Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) allows businesses to borrow up to $10 million to, essentially, make payroll and keep their employees working. Last April, a man named Maurice Fayne, who owns a business called Flame Trucking, applied to United Community Bank for a PPP loan.

Mr. Fayne wanted United Community Bank to disburse $3.7 million to him. And to get it, Fayne certified to the bank that his business employed 107 people and had an average monthly payroll of nearly $1.5 million. Fayne said that the loan proceeds would be used to pay workers and ongoing business expenses. Based on the representations in Fayne’s application, the Georgia-based bank funded a loan of more than $2 million.

Within days, Fayne, who also starred in the reality TV program Love & Hip Hop: Atlanta, allegedly used those funds to purchase $85,000 in jewelry, lease a Rolls Royce, and pay $40,000 in child support. Oh, and he dispersed another $230,000 to associates who helped him run a Ponzi scheme. Needless to say, that’s not the kind of “payroll” contemplated by the CARES Act.

Fayne’s now been charged with bank fraud, making a false statement to a federally insured financial institution, and money laundering. And we’re in the process of seizing $700,000 back from him.

As this audience likely knows, PPP loan applications must be processed by a participating financial institution. If a PPP loan application is approved, the lender funds the loan using its own money, which is 100% guaranteed by the Small Business Administration (SBA).

The good news for United Community Bank, and other banks like it, is that PPP loans are guaranteed by the SBA even if the borrower’s application turns out to have been based on fraud. The SBA will review the loan to ensure the lender followed the program rules in approving and servicing the loan, and if so, will purchase the loan from the victim bank.

The bad news, as a lot of you know, is the immense cost in time and resources that frauds like this impose on banks like United Community Bank. CARES Act frauds have highlighted the burdens and challenges that financial institutions face when trying to undo the damage done by the fraudsters. And for banks in particular, it takes time and energy to prove on the back end that they did their part at the due diligence stage.

At bottom, illicit actors are opportunists. So it’s no surprise that they would attempt to exploit the global COVID pandemic to enrich themselves. That’s why one theme I’ll return to again and again today is the vital importance of working together—law enforcement, regulatory agencies, and the private sector—to stop criminals from defrauding our banks and otherwise abusing the financial system to advance their crimes.

Financial Crime Trends

When it comes to evolving technologies, criminal actors have all too often been quick studies in an effort to stay one step ahead of law enforcement. Financial crimes are no exception. Over the past nine months, emerging financial crime trends have revolved around COVID fraud and CARES Act stimulus funds—fraud involving unemployment insurance, PPP loans, and Small Business Economic Injury Disaster Loans. The FBI’s Internet Crime Complaint Center, or IC3, which allows the public to report suspected internet-facilitated criminal activity to the FBI, has received more than 26,000 complaints specifically related to COVID-19 fraud schemes. That’s 26,000 fraud complaints—and you can bet banks are roped in, one way or another, in just about all of them.

In response, we’ve established a COVID-19 Fraud Response Working Group with the Department of Justice, other law enforcement partners, and civil regulators. The group is going after criminals trying to exploit this pandemic to make a quick buck. In one well-publicized case, former NFL Player Joshua Bellamy was charged with wire fraud and bank fraud for conspiring to obtain millions of dollars in fraudulent PPP loans. A bank disbursed to the former New York Jet—and as a Giants fan, I feel compelled to stress that he was a New York Jet—a $1.2 million loan for his entertainment company.

As charged, he then used the proceeds to spend more than $100,000 on Dior, Gucci, jewelry, and tens of thousands more at the Seminole Hard Rock Hotel and Casino in Hollywood, Florida. But that wasn’t enough. Bellamy was allegedly so pleased with this fraud scheme that he looped in his friends and family. And in the end, the scheme involved the preparation of at least 90 fraudulent applications and bank payouts of at least $17.4 million. That means banks are on the hook for that $17.4 million unless or until they can prove to the SBA that they diligently followed the program rules in approving and servicing those loans.

In addition to COVID-related fraud, we’re seeing a range of other fraud schemes, and one thing that we’re seeing across them is the use of money mules. As this audience is acutely aware, criminals often use money mules—that is, middlemen—to deposit illegally acquired funds into bank accounts. Money mules pass funds through wire transfers or virtual currency to add another layer between criminals and victims. Why? To make it that much harder for both banks and law enforcement to follow the trail. That’s why it’s absolutely essential that banks and law enforcement work together to fight back.

And with help from financial institutions, we are fighting back. Just last week, the Justice Department announced the results of an initiative that took action against more than 2,000 money mules. Two thousand. These individuals help victimize everyone from veterans to grandparents, and they put banks right in the middle of it all.

The opportunism doesn’t end there. With a growing number of people doing most of their shopping from home to avoid COVID, we’ve seen a rise in e-skimming, where hackers steal personal and payment information as consumers shop online. They then use that information to make fraudulent purchases themselves. Or they sell it to someone who will.

Financial institutions, like credit card companies, can then find themselves on the hook. Our private sector partners indicate that e-skimming attacks have grown by at least 20% during the pandemic. We also continue to see a rise in synthetic identity fraud, where large amounts of personal data stolen during an online breach are combined with false information to create new identities. Fraudsters use these synthetic identities to apply for credit, eventually establishing credit history and higher credit limits. Just one bad guy can accumulate hundreds of accounts simultaneously, using techniques like credit piggybacking to accelerate the accrual of higher credit limits. And all this financial fraud then lands at your doorstep.

Money Laundering

Along with these emerging trends in financial crimes, money laundering schemes continue to underpin many of our investigations. We’ve identified money laundering networks that support otherwise unrelated criminal networks, including a mix of international criminal organizations and national security threats. We’re also seeing things like trade-based money laundering, which uses trade transactions to disguise criminals’ ill-gotten gains. To combat these phenomena, we’re working with other government agencies, financial institutions, and other private sector partners. We’re engaging with leaders, like you, in the banking and technology industries to enhance the FBI’s capabilities and exchange information. And we’re using technology to help make the most of the copious data that financial fraudsters can’t help but produce.

Platforms like IC3 give us the ability to ingest large amounts of data and identify and analyze fraud patterns that may not be visible to a complainant. For instance, a fraud victim in one city can be matched up to a pattern of similar fraud victims across the country through analytical reviews of data sets—allowing us to broaden our investigations and identify other potential subjects.

Our field offices also have Suspicious Activity Report (SAR) working groups that comb data to identify new threat patterns in their area. These types of analyses help our field offices to both stay well-informed and be more efficient in fighting financial crime.

Staying ahead of the threat requires leveraging our technological resources to their greatest potential. So we continue to look for creative ways to transform our data sets into actionable intelligence and investigations. Bank Secrecy Act (BSA) data is a great example where the public/private partnerships help us combat criminal activity in the digital age. The financial intelligence generated by BSA reporting is critical to law enforcement’s investigation and prosecution of both criminal activities and national security threats. Information from SARs, Currency Transaction Reports, Reports of International Transportation of Currency or Monetary Instruments, and other BSA reporting can also help law enforcement agencies see the broader picture of a criminal network. That data allows us to map networks, trace funds, and ultimately, thwart fraud and protect banks and other victims.

Take SARs. SAR narratives capture an incredible range of conduct. Let’s say a foreign institution establishes a U.S. bank account in order to conduct illicit transactions in U.S. dollars. Law enforcement can use reports of these correspondent bank transactions to follow financial trails, investigate specific individuals and entities, identify leads, connect the dots, and advance investigations.

Virtual Currencies

We and our partners aren’t the only ones recognizing the need for creativity and innovation. Our success in working with banks to fight money laundering schemes means criminals are finding innovative ways to exploit new technologies to “clean” dirty money. Virtual currencies enable the almost instantaneous transfer of value to a recipient anywhere in the world. In some cases, though, there is then very little “paper trail” to follow should an investigation become necessary. And this issue is exacerbated by cryptocurrency tumblers—that is, services that mix tracked and clean cryptocurrencies to hide transactions and hinder law enforcement’s ability to track open ledger currencies, like Bitcoin.

As this technology proliferates, banks are becoming more comfortable with a legitimate virtual asset risk profile as part of their business. In July, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency issued a public letter allowing any national bank to hold the cryptographic keys associated with cryptocurrencies in what are essentially virtual vaults, just as they’d hold stock certificates for investors. Like banks, payment processors are also increasingly comfortable integrating virtual assets. PayPal, for example, now supports several cryptocurrencies, enabling users to buy, hold, and sell cryptocurrency directly through PayPal. And by early 2021, PayPal plans to allow customers to use crypto assets within its merchant network to pay for goods and services.

It should be no surprise, then, that as various legitimate uses of virtual currencies become more common, these currencies have also moved to center stage for criminals. We now see predatory actors using virtual assets across all criminal platforms to launder illicit funds. And legitimate users of cryptocurrency markets and exchanges have now become tempting targets for both criminal and nation-state actors. That’s because stolen funds can be instantly transferred, and there’s no central banking entity that can immediately freeze assets and pay victims.

We see actors across a wide range of threats using virtual currencies to purchase criminal tools like botnets, launder their illicit proceeds, evade sanctions, and otherwise try to prevent us from “following the money” back to them. Virtual currencies also enable additional anonymization tools like malware-as-a-service and other dark market criminal products that make tracing illicit activity that much harder. This kind of thing used to be limited to sophisticated adversaries. But now, even relatively unsophisticated actors are using virtual currencies to cloak their activities. That proliferation requires our agents and analysts working almost every type of case to be able to recognize virtual currencies; apply sophisticated analytic techniques and tools; and use them to obtain evidence and develop leads. All this has required a significant investment in resources and training for our investigators and analysts.

As a result, the FBI has developed deep expertise in virtual currencies. We’re now getting advanced analytic techniques and tools into the hands of our professionals investigating everything from child exploitation to public corruption. And we’re drawing connections from work we do across a range of investigations to help map illicit payment networks. We’re being creative—seizing virtual currencies when appropriate, working with foreign partners to follow criminal trails overseas, and collaborating with our colleagues at other investigative agencies, the SEC, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, and of course DOJ to stay on top of threats as they evolve. We’re also collaborating with the financial industry and with academics, both to further advance our understanding and use of existing technology, and to proactively position ourselves to see what’s on the horizon.

Technology affects every kind of threat we face. Criminals, terrorists, and nation state actors will all continue to use technology to try and anonymize and facilitate illicit activity. Which is why we must continue to invest in our own technological resources to ensure that we’re staying ahead of each threat.

Partnerships

That brings me to perhaps the most important section of my remarks: partnerships. Moving forward, we’ve got to use our respective strengths to work toward a common purpose: keeping our economy, our citizens, and our companies safe, secure, and confident in a digitally connected world.

We’ve got to find even more ways to work together, public and private sector. It’s not just the best option, it’s really the only option. The FBI has a long history of cooperating with law enforcement and private sector partners across the globe to confront complex criminal threats. That kind of team approach is how we’ll successfully combat financial crime. We’re exchanging valuable information with the private sector through conferences like these, and our daily discussions with corporate partners are also informing our strategic focus, by making sure we know what threats most concern you.

Overseas, we’ve got legal attachés sharing intelligence and building partnerships with both foreign law enforcement and security services and enabling a virtuous cycle of cooperation. We pass information developed through our investigations to our foreign partners, including warnings about frauds perpetrated against financial institutions and American citizens. Our partners who respond to those leads can in turn provide us with more information about the threats we all face. That information feeds our global investigations and helps us discover even more indicators the private sector can use to mitigate these threats. It also provides us with more arrest opportunities, allows us to recover more illicit funds, and it puts us in a position to generate more information to pass back to our partners in a true virtuous cycle. We’re making significant strides, we’ve had a number of successes, but we still need to collaborate even more.

You’re bringing expertise to the table. You know the risks to your institutions, you’re identifying the fraudsters, and you’re going to see emerging threats coming down the road. At the FBI, we have unique expertise too. We’re able to perform analysis and combine that with the intelligence we collect to alert you to what we’re seeing out there and how these emerging frauds can affect your financial institutions.

In turn, we need financial institutions to continue to work with us through SARs and other means and to work with our field offices to initiate cases. Which is why I hope you have a strong working relationship with the special agents and special agents in charge working in your communities. If you don’t, I encourage you to work with them to talk about your concerns and let us know how we can best help you. We now have private sector coordinators in every FBI field office. If you haven’t met that person in your city, you should make the connection.

Early notification to law enforcement can limit your losses and those of your customers. And we can respond a lot faster in times of crisis if we already have a relationship with you—if we already know your facilities and your people. As the old saying goes, the best time to patch the roof is when the sun is shining. We’ve got to keep helping each other, so we can protect each other from threats we all face. And we must place an even greater emphasis on information sharing than ever before.

* * *

Technological advances give financial criminals the means to commit crimes in new and nefarious ways. But when it comes down to it, it’s the same as it ever was: It’s all about the money. Criminals will go after it any way they can. And they never let a crisis go to waste. This pandemic has been no exception. And they’re going to exploit this environment in ways that offer the least chance of getting caught—anonymously, from behind a keyboard.

As illicit actors become more sophisticated and have greater access to technology, it means we have to be smarter and quicker about preventing and stopping fraud. The good news is that while financial criminals have access to more technological tools and institutions than ever before, we do too. And we have each other. You’re innovating, and we, too, will continue to evolve to counter the actors where they operate.

I want to thank you for your insight and your expertise as we continue to work together to combat ever-evolving financial crimes. I’ll end with a call to action. Please engage with the FBI and your local field offices. We need to keep finding ways to help each other.

Thank you. Happy to take a few questions.