Defense News: Navy awards $3.5B contract to Northrop Grumman to develop successor to E-6B Mercury aircraft

Source: United States Navy

Under the contract, Northrop Grumman of Melbourne, Florida, will serve as the prime contractor to integrate TACAMO mission systems, including the Collins Aerospace Very Low Frequency system, into government-furnished C-130J-30 air vehicles built by Lockheed Martin Corp. The contract is for three Engineering Development Models (EDMs) and options for up to three System Demonstration Test Articles (SDTAs) and up to six aircraft in the first lot of production. Collins Aerospace and Lockheed Martin are directed subcontractors to support the integration and airworthiness.

“Our TACAMO mission is foundational to our nation’s nuclear Triad,” said Secretary of the Navy Carlos Del Toro. “The E-130J will carry on the proud legacy of Navy TACAMO aircraft and keep our nation safe.”

The acquisition effort is being led by the Navy’s Airborne Strategic Command, Control and Communications Program Office (PMA-271) within the Program Executive Office for Air Anti-Submarine Warfare, Assault and Special Mission Programs (PEO(A)).

“Today is a tremendous day for the future of naval aviation’s contribution to our nation’s nuclear deterrence mission,” said Capt. Adam Scott, PMA-271 program manager. “With the selection of Northrop Grumman as the prime contractor for the TACAMO Recapitalization Program, we are ready to move out with developing this critical asset. In carrying on the legacy of the E-6B Mercury, the E-130J will ensure our nation’s leadership is always connected to its nuclear forces for decades to come.”

Work developing this asset in conjunction with the prime contractor begins today.

The contract award is the result of a competitive source selection that included significant engagement with industry. PMA-271 released the request for proposals on sam.gov on Sept. 21, 2023, with proposals due by April 22, 2024.

The Navy selected the winner based on the proposal that offered the best value to the government, considering the offeror’s technical approach and cost. The total contract value is $3,459,276,000.

The E-130J is a critical part of the United States’ nuclear modernization program, which includes new Columbia-class ballistic missile submarines, new bomber aircraft such as the B-21 Raider, and Sentinel, a new ground-based system to replace the silo-based Minuteman III intercontinental ballistic missiles. The E-130J will ensure that leadership can always communicate with those nuclear forces to order or cancel strikes, even if ground-based communications are unavailable.

The E-6B is a communications relay and strategic airborne command post aircraft. It provides survivable, reliable, and endurable airborne nuclear command, control and communications (NC3) for the president, secretary of defense and U.S. Strategic Command. It is a dual-mission aircraft capable of fulfilling the no-fail TACAMO mission and the Looking Glass mission, which facilitates the launch of U.S. land-based intercontinental ballistic missiles using an airborne launch control system. The E-130J will relieve the E-6B of the TACAMO mission.

PMA-271 is headquartered at Naval Air Station Patuxent River, Maryland. Its mission is to deliver and support survivable, reliable and endurable airborne command, control and communications for the president, secretary of defense and U.S. Strategic Command.

Defense News: COMSUBLANT Announces 2024 Battle “E” Winners

Source: United States Navy

The Battle “E” competition is conducted to strengthen and evaluate both command and overall Force warfighting readiness and to recognize outstanding command performance. The criterion for the Battle “E” Award is the overall readiness of a crew to execute its combat mission.

COMSUBLANT Battle “E” winners are the following:

USS North Dakota (SSN 784), Commander, Submarine Squadron TWO (CSS-2)
USS Virginia (SSN 774), CSS-4
USS New Hampshire (SSN 778), CSS-6
USS New Jersey (SSN 796), CSS-8
USS California (SSN 781), CSS-12
USS Florida (SSGN 728) (BLUE), CSS-16
USS Florida (SSGN 728) (GOLD), CSS-16
USS Tennessee (SSBN 734) (BLUE), CSS-20
USS Tennessee (SSBN 734) (GOLD), CSS-20

Special Category – Shipyard Readiness

USS Hartford (SSN 768)

Special Category – Submarine Readiness Squadron

Submarine Readiness Squadron 32

Engineering Red “E” winners:

USS North Dakota (SSN 784), CSS-2
USS Hyman G. Rickover (SSN 795), CSS-4
USS Albany (SSN 753), CSS-6
USS Montpelier (SSN 795), CSS-8
USS Delaware (SSN 791), CSS-12
USS Florida (SSGN 728) (BLUE), CSS-16
USS Maryland (SSBN 738) (BLUE), CSS-20

White Weapons “W” winners:

USS Cheyenne (SSN 773), CSS-2
USS Hyman G. Rickover (SSN 795), CSS-4
USS Pasadena (SSN 752), CSS-6
USS Montana (SSN 794), CSS-8
USS Indiana (SSN 789), CSS-12
USS Florida (SSGN 728) (GOLD), CSS-16
USS Alaska (SSBN 732) (BLUE), CSS-20

White Strategic “S” winner:

USS Tennessee (SSBN 734) (BLUE), CSS-20

Navigation Red and Green “N” winners:

USS North Dakota (SSN 784), CSS-2
USS Virginia (SSN 774), CSS-4
USS New Hampshire (SSN 778), CSS-6
PCU Massachusetts (SSN 798), CSS-8
USS Delaware (SSN 791), CSS-12
USS Florida (SSGN 728) (GOLD), CSS-16
USS Tennessee (SSBN 734) (BLUE), CSS-20

Communications/Cyber Green “C” winners:

USS Cheyenne (SSN 773), CSS-2
USS South Dakota (SSN 790), CSS-4
USS New Mexico (SSN 779), CSS-6
USS John Warner (SSN 785), CSS-8
USS California (SSN 781), CSS-12
USS Florida (SSGN 728) (GOLD), CSS-16
USS Maryland (SSBN 738) (BLUE), CSS-20

Electronic Warfare Green “E” winners:

USS North Dakota (SSN 784), CSS-2
USS Hyman G. Rickover (SSN 795), CSS-4
USS New Hampshire (SSN 778), CSS-6
USS Boise (SSN 764), CSS-8
USS Delaware (SSN 791), CSS-12
USS Florida (SSGN 728) (GOLD), CSS-16
USS Alaska (SSBN 732) (GOLD), CSS-20

Supply Blue “E” winners:

USS Texas (SSN 775), CSS-2
USS Oregon (SSN 793), CSS-4
USS New Hampshire (SSN 778), CSS-6
USS Montana (SSN 794), CSS-8
USS Indiana (SSN 789), CSS-12
USS Florida (SSGN 728) (BLUE), CSS-16
USS Maryland (SSBN 738) (GOLD), CSS-20

Personnel White “P” winners:

USS North Dakota (SSN 784), CSS-2
PCU Iowa (SSN 797), CSS-4
USS Albany (SSN 753), CSS-6
USS Montana (SSN 794), CSS-8
USS Hartford (SSN 768), CSS-12
USS Georgia (SSGN 729) (BLUE), CSS-16
USS Rhode Island (SSBN 740) (BLUE), CSS-20

Medical Yellow “M” winners:

USS Texas (SSN 775), CSS-2
USS Virginia (SSN 774), CSS-4
USS Pasadena (SSN 752), CSS-6
USS Montpelier (SSN 765), CSS-8
USS California (SSN 781), CSS-12
USS Florida (SSGN 728) (GOLD), CSS-16
USS Tennessee (SSBN 734) (GOLD), CSS-20

On-time periodic maintenance requirements (PMR) and KMRC accomplishment is essential to meeting submarine force readiness goals. PMRs and KMRCs help ensure the material readiness of the force and are critical inputs to completing the engineering analysis necessary to get more players on the field by extending operating intervals, reducing idle time, and reducing depot availability durations.

The KMRC “K” is a first-time Submarine Force-wide award acknowledging the performance monitoring team (PMT) site that bests supports the fleet and KMRC accomplishment. The PMR “P” is a first-time TYCOM-specific award acknowledging the submarine squadron with the best assigned submarine PMR performance.

KMRC “K” winner:
Submarine Squadron 15/ PMT Guam

PMR “P” winner: Submarine Squadron 12

“The competition for these awards is, as always, extremely keen,” said Gaucher. “These awards should be a source of great pride to each and every crew member – Bravo Zulu for a job well done.”

The Battle “E” competition recognizes commands that attained the highest overall or departmental readiness to carry out assigned wartime tasks as a unit of the Atlantic Submarine Force and is based on a year-long evaluation.

For commissioned ships in the shipyard, being awarded the Battle “E” is reflective of overall readiness to meet production milestones throughout the year and the crew’s combat readiness as indicated per the CTQM, pursuit of underway time for the crew, crew-shipyard relationships, inspections, audits, etc.

These ships were considered the most ready for combat throughout the year and were judged based on their warfighting readiness; mission accomplishments; self-assessments and ability to improve; ability to innovate; and resiliency in executing the ship’s schedule.

The Submarine Force executes the Department of the Navy’s mission in and from the undersea domain. In addition to lending added capacity to naval forces, the Submarine Force, in particular, is expected to leverage those special advantages that come with undersea concealment to permit operational, deterrent and combat effects that the Navy and the nation could not otherwise achieve.

The Submarine Force and supporting organizations constitute the primary undersea arm of the Navy. Submarines and their crews remain the tip of the undersea spear.

Defense News: Superlative Sound: U.S. Pacific Fleet Band Shares Culture with Pacific Islands, Continues Proud Tradition

Source: United States Navy

In 2024, the U.S. Pacific Fleet Band shared its music with 2.5 million people in nine countries and four Hawaiian Islands. Its 600 engagements included concerts for the community, performances for school children, official Navy events and ceremonies, and shows for Sailors. Band members also participated in the annual Pacific Partnership, the Navy’s largest multinational humanitarian and disaster relief mission conducted in the Indo-Pacific, taking them to Vietnam, the Philippines, Tonga, and across Micronesia for cultural exchanges.

It’s a rigorous schedule for the band, which has been representing the U.S. Navy in Hawaii for more than 75 years. The Pacific Fleet Band is one of 11 bands in the Navy that inspire patriotism, elevate esprit de corps, support recruiting and retention efforts, preserve the Nation’s musical heritage, and carry the Navy message around the world. Navy bands go where ships can’t go, expanding and strengthening the Navy’s network of partners. In a typical year, Navy bands travel to more than 40 countries, helping improve access and relationships abroad.

A musical ambassador for the U.S. Pacific Fleet, the Pacific Fleet Band is led by Lt. Clint Mcclanahan, who was named Fleet Bandmaster in January 2024. He enlisted in the Navy in July 2003 and commissioned in 2015 after 12 years as an enlisted electric bass player. Prior to reporting as Fleet Bandmaster, Mcclanahan received a Master of Music in wind band conducting from the Jacobs School of Music at Indiana University as part of the Naval Postgraduate School Civilian Institutions Program. He also holds a Bachelor of Music Education from Morehead State University.

Like Mcclanahan, all 42 members of the Pacific Fleet Band are trained musicians. Most have a bachelor’s degree in music, while some have advanced degrees. To earn a spot on the band, musicians must audition, similar to auditioning for a spot in a major symphony.

Unique Musician Rating

After boot camp, musicians go to “A” school for 21 weeks in Little Creek, Virginia.

Unlike most other Navy ratings, which have identical roles after completing initial training, musicians also have a designator indicating what instrument they play. A Navy band needs an appropriate blend of flutes, clarinets, oboes to play a John Philip Sousa march, Mcclanahan explained.

The band also has other instruments that allow it to play more than typical military fare.

“We also have vocalists, we have guitar players, piano players, drum set players, bass players, so that we can perform not just military music of our past but popular music of the day,” Mcclanahan said.

Although the band has musicians who can play multiple instruments, it is not a Navy requirement.

The band’s song list includes “bread and butter songs that live in the soul of a military musician” such as the “National Anthem,” “Eternal Father,” “The Stars and Stripes Forever,” as well as “Hawaiʻi Ponoʻī,” which is unique to a Hawaii. Mcclanahan explained that musicians also have about 25 songs ready to go at any given moment, but the list is constantly evolving based on the time of year and the band’s different ensembles.

In addition to parade, ceremonial and concerts bands, there are also smaller chamber groups like brass and woodwind quintets that perform at military ceremonies, public concerts and music education clinics.

Two musical groups perform contemporary tunes that appeal to audiences of all ages: Pipeline, a rock band that plays music from the early days of rock and roll to the latest pop and country hits; and Pau Hana Sound, which plays popular music with a nod to local instrumentation and musical styles.

December is a particularly busy time for the band with Pearl Harbor Remembrance Day ceremonies on Dec. 7, free holiday performances for the public at Ala Moana Center and Hale Koa Hotel and marching in community Christmas parades.

In January, the band heads to Hawaii Island as part of Music in School, a public school outreach program where band members host music clinics for students and perform concerts. In April, the band plans to support the Merrie Monarch Festival, the week-long festival held in April in Hilo that features an internationally acclaimed hula competition and showcases Hawaiian art and culture following the ideals of King Kalākaua. The band will travel to American Samoa later that month.

History of the Band

The U.S. Pacific Fleet Band has a unique history. It first formed in February 1941 when Pacific Fleet Headquarters was established at Pearl Harbor.

In September 1941, the band participated in the Battle of Music, a competition among Navy bands from capitol ships homeported in Pearl Harbor and bands attached to shore installations in Hawaii. However, the final round was canceled after the attack on Pearl Harbor on Dec. 7, 1941. In previous rounds of the competition, bands played one swing number, a ballad, a specialty tune, and a song performed for a jitterbug contest.

On the day of the attack on Pearl Harbor, the entire USS Arizona band was at battle stations passing ammunition under gun turret number one. All band members were killed during the attack. The Battle of Music participants later decided to posthumously award that year’s tournament trophy to the band that had perished, Navy Band Unit 22. The award was renamed the Arizona Trophy.

Although Navy Bands don’t compete in official competitions in modern times, Mcclanahan said each band is proud of its performance.

“There is the usual organizational pride between each of the service bands,” he said. “We all believe that WE are the ones playing the right notes, the right way.”

In the decades after the attack on Pearl Harbor, band members have performed across Asia and the Pacific including in South Korea, Guam, the Philippines, Vietnam, and Australia.

On May 21, 2001, the band performed aboard the USS John C. Stennis (CVN 74) for the premiere of the movie “Pearl Harbor.”

More recently, Mcclanahan shared how adjustments made during COVID-19 in 2021, created changes that are still delighting audiences. Since the band couldn’t perform in front of live audiences, the band needed another way to reach music goers, so they turned to video and social media.

A recent example of this is the “Let it Snow” music video, featuring music by Pau Hana Sound. Navy Music, U.S. Pacific Fleet Band’s higher command that governs all fleet bands in the District of Columbia and Annapolis, started an initiative to create music videos during COVID-19 when bands were unable to perform in-person for audiences. After social isolation requirements ended, the push for music videos continued with 12 Days of Navy Music, “an online musical extravaganza” of sacred and secular music performed by Navy Bands stationed at home and around the world that is released on YouTube and Facebook.

This year’s lineup featured “The Twelve Days of Christmas,” “Mele Kalikimaka,” “Carol of the Bells,” “Run, Run, Rudolph,” “O Christmas Tree,” “Must’ve Been Old Santa Claus,” excerpts from “The Nutcracker,” “Let It Snow,” and more.

Mcclanahan shared that many band members are from the continental U.S. and they decided to capture the feeling of a cold winter with an unexpected Hawaiian twist. The result was a new version of “Let It Snow” that mixes snow, nostalgia, and blue ocean backdrops of Pearl Harbor with a warm holiday sound that might have some pining for a cup of hot chocolate despite Hawaii’s balmy weather.

Reflecting on this and the ongoing work of the U.S. Pacific Fleet Band, Mcclanahan said he appreciates the steadfast dedication and professionalism of the band members, who inspire him and the American public – and he recognizes what a distinct privilege and incredible responsibility the band enjoys every day.

“I admire the skill and dedication that every Navy Musician brings to their jobs. It’s exciting to see these Sailors engage with audiences, especially the international audiences, and strengthen international relationships through cultural exchange,” said Mcclanahan. “They are ambassadors for the Navy and the United States of America. In many cases, the only Americans that our audience will ever meet is a Navy Musician. The members of the Pacific Fleet Band understand that is a huge responsibility and amazing honor.”

Defense News: Cooking an Innovation Stew

Source: United States Navy

For Scott Bewley, the mission of NavalX is simple.

“We want to build, lead and sustain an ecosystem that promotes innovation not only within the Department of the Navy [DoN] but also the broader Department of Defense [DoD],” he said.

Bewley, NavalX’s deputy director of business operations, gave his remarks while leading a professional talk at the 2024 Naval Science and Technology (S&T)/Combat Systems/Technology, Systems and Ships Symposium held Dec. 9-12 in Arlington, Virginia.

Hosted by the Office of Naval Research (ONR) and the American Society of Naval Engineers, the symposium enabled attendees across the U.S. Navy and Marine Corps, industry and academia to meet, discuss and learn about “Naval S&T: From Idea to Maritime Dominance.”

During his presentation, Bewley gave an overview of NavalX. Founded in 2019, NavalX, which is led by Director Capt. Joel Uzarski, is ONR’s accelerator department responsible for centralizing and streamlining the innovation pipeline at naval organizations and establishing smoother collaborations between the Naval Research and Development Establishment (NR&DE), academia and industry.

NavalX also helps the NR&DE leverage the commercial market and attract private investments to hasten and reduce the cost for defense acquisition and deployment of technologies that provide capabilities to the warfighter, employ agile best practices in contracting that accelerate awards, and provide flexibility and speed in technology maturation and adoption.

“Our success is directly aligned with the success of the entire defense innovation ecosystem,” said Bewley. “We partner with naval labs, programs and warfare centers to support technological transformation in practical ways.”

To achieve this, NavalX works closely with the DoN Technology Transfer (T2) Program Office as well as the Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) and Small Business Technology Transfer (STTR) programs — all located at ONR.

The DoN Technology Transfer (T2) Program Office oversees the policies, guidance, designations and training for the DoN T2 professionals who foster collaboration between the Navy and Marine Corps, government agencies, industry and academia. The SBIR program provides the Navy and Marine Corps with innovative advances in technology created by small businesses — while STTR transitions products developed by both small businesses and research institutions.

Bewley closed out his talk with the topic of Tech Bridges. A partnership involving ONR, NavalX, the DoN T2 Program Office, and the Navy’s systems commands, Tech Bridges serve as regional innovation hubs where warfare centers, government, academia and industry can team up and work together on technology research, evaluation and commercialization — as well as economic and workforce development.

Each hub enables local projects designed to solve pressing problems and technology needs identified by the DoN. There are 18 Tech Bridge locations worldwide — 17 in the U.S. and one in London, England.

“At the end of the day, we want to add more players to the field,” said Bewley. “They could be larger, more established companies, startups, nontraditional companies. We want to ensure the Department of the Navy has access to the best possible technology and capabilities to address operational challenges and strategic priorities.”

Click here to learn more about NavalX.

Warren Duffie Jr. is a contractor for ONR Corporate Strategic Communications.

Defense News: Maritime Dominance at Symposium

Source: United States Navy

What role does scientific and technological innovation play in providing critical capability to Sailors and Marines around the world? How can the Naval Research and Development Establishment — and its diverse array of partners — best align to the warfighting priorities laid out by the Secretary of the Navy (SECNAV), Chief of Naval Operations and Commandant of the Marine Corps?

These were powerful underlying themes at the 2024 Naval Science and Technology (S&T)/Combat Systems/Technology, Systems and Ships Symposium held Dec. 9-12 in Arlington, Virginia.

Hosted by the Office of Naval Research (ONR) and the American Society of Naval Engineers (ASNE), the symposium enabled attendees across the U.S. Navy and Marine Corps, industry and academia to meet, discuss and learn about “Naval S&T: From Idea to Maritime Dominance,” particularly focus areas crucial to the Department of the Navy.

Chief of Naval Research Rear Adm. Kurt Rothenhaus gave a joint opening keynote address with Rear Adm. Tom Dickinson, program executive officer for Integrated Warfare Systems.

“ONR appreciates the chance to team with partners like ASNE to help shape research outcomes that support the Fleet and Force,” said Rothenhaus. “It’s a prime example of the partnerships between industry, academia and government that are needed to rapidly discover and deliver for the Sailors and Marines we have the privilege of serving.”

Additional speakers included the Hon. Carlos Del Toro, SECNAV; the Hon. Nickolas Guertin, assistant secretary of the Navy for Research, Development and Acquisition (ASN RD&A); and Vice Adm. Scott Pappano, principal military deputy, ASN RD&A.

The symposium showcased two ONR-led discussion panels — held Dec. 10 and 12, respectively — focusing on science and technology.

The Dec. 10 panel was titled “Naval Power: Science and Technology to deliver in an era of strategic competition and technological change.” ONR Executive Director Dr. Thomas Fu served as moderator and participants included:

• Dr. Michael Pollock, department head, ONR C5ISRT
• Dr. Knox Millsaps, department head, ONR Naval Air Warfare and Weapons
• Dr. Gregory Orris, Naval Engineering Focus Area lead, ONR Sea Warfare and Weapons

This event touched on topics such as recognizing the current state of strategic competition with peer adversaries and the need to be agile in an ever-changing environment; the importance of the Naval S&T Strategy in building partnerships, creating a culture of S&T excellence and enhancing maritime dominance; and the need to revitalize basic research and collaborate with industry and academic partners.

The Dec. 12 panel was titled “S&T to improve the lethality, survivability and affordability of the Fleet and Force.” Moderated by Capt. Steven Tarr III, the military deputy in ONR’s Sea Warfare and Weapons Department, it featured the following panelists:

• Ben Bouffard, deputy director of the Naval Sea Systems Command’s Technology Office
• Neil Graf, program lead, ONR ManTech
• Dr. Jennifer Wolk, acting department head, ONR Sea Warfare and Weapons

This event discussed issues and challenges surrounding sustainment, maintenance and manufacturing; the impact of the Cold War’s end on the U.S. military shipbuilding and industrial base, as well as subsequent struggles; and how innovations such as additive manufacturing are crucial to naval maintenance and repair.

In addition to the main S&T panels, other ONR-related professional talks included:

• Sandy Landsberg, Naval STEM Coordination Office executive and a division director in ONR’s C5ISRT Department, gave a presentation about Navy AI.
• Scott Bewley, NavalX deputy director of business operations, and Capt. Eric Hutter, ONR Global executive officer, provided overviews of their respective organizations.
• In a presentation titled “The Future of Naval Weapons,” Capt. Jesse Black, commanding officer of the Naval Research Laboratory (NRL), discussed the mission and organizational structure of NRL, its history and connection to Thomas Edison, past technological successes and advances, and its current role in developing groundbreaking S&T capabilities for the Navy and Marine Corps.

“Improving not only the lethality, survivability and affordability of our current and future system is not an easy task,” said Rothenhaus. “However, by teaming early and often on a common north star — we have shown we can achieve incredible results for our Sailors and Marines.”

The broader purpose of the 2024 Naval S&T/Combat Systems/Technology, Systems and Ships Symposium aligned with the Naval S&T Strategy released earlier this year by SECNAV Del Toro. The strategy serves as sailing directions for strengthening collaboration with industry, academia, and partners and allies, to cultivate groundbreaking scientific research and accelerate delivery of technological innovation to the Navy and Marine Corps.

Warren Duffie Jr. is a contractor for ONR Corporate Strategic Communications.